In today's ACIP meeting, pro-vax "experts" relied heavily on published science papers that supported their views. Got to wonder what happened to those papers that didn't support their views.
Like the meme says, "Of course all scientists agree . . . when you censor the ones that don't".
The system is corrupt. Kevin, thank you for calling it out.
I don’t know if you ever read the substack called TTE, Trust The Evidence, Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson are on the same theme about non disclosure of funding. Man the sharks are out in full force. The corruption runs deep. This must be so frustrating with all the games being played just to stop your very important paper. Do you even get a chance to refute the accusations where it matters?
I'm glad you're speaking out and pushing back against all the deception and trickery. Not many people are in a position to call them out but it's imperative to uncover the truth. The pharma machine has no heart, no soul, and will never back off from the relentless pursuit of money and power.
I don't believe for a minute that the new ACIP review board will be privy to this rebuttal paper aimed at Retraction Watch as it attempts to have have the latest article on DNA contamination retracted. You would think that any and all information relevant to the safety and effectiveness of this product would be front and center and rigorously examined by these "experts". That would be my expectation. I will wait and see what the "experts" decide today. Will they ignore the data and give their blessing to this poison or will they actually do what they were empaneled to do?
Oh! I’ve subscribed to Retraction Watch for a few years now but had no idea they were fudged . I had a twinge of suspicion about them when they announced that they had found a sponsor.
The WEF or World Enslavement Forum has a trinitarian God also. Their trinity is depopulation, decarbonization, and dehumanization. And they insist the useless eaters pay for all three because they are that clever.
Their modus operandi is to first manufacture the crisis (Covid) than manufacture consent to their solution (never before used on humans m-rna-lnp gene therapy).
Bill Gates, Fauci, Susan Monarez et al all say with certainty that another pandemic is inevitable and soon. They never seem to mention all the biolabs around the world working feverishly on gain of function research as the cause.
But if you take away the time to market advantages of the m-rna-lnp platform (their alleged pandemic solution) than they won’t be able to inject any more poison (disguised as a vaccine) into the people and will have to settle for the number they can maim and kill with just their gain of function pathogens.
Eugenics is such a nasty business especially when you read this expert’s opinion about gain of function research taking place now with reckless abandon.
"There is no scientific benefit that justifies the risk of creating novel human pathogens. None." Simon Wain-Hobson (virologist who first cloned and sequenced HIV)
Quoting anything that the Australian TGA claims..is hilarious.
They are bought and paid for by the vaxx manufacturers.
When presented with one of the vaxx manufacturers saying their own products were a form of gene therapy, the TGA tried to argue they did not agree with the manufacturer.
They washed out the death reports here by using the WHO causality assessment framework.
They denied it in a senate hearing..then admitted it...
Hi Kevin, I am wondering whether you could ask the other Kevin (McCairn) if he could look at some other body fluids (not only blood as at present) for evidence of amyloid fibrils. Eg. Saliva, faeces, semen.
This might reveal transmission risks. Thanks.
I know he has found amyloids in CFS in one patient.
Know there is much I do not know, but have nagging questions about ‘investors’ and funding mechanisms for hit pieces. As the funding and investors appear to be an incestuous bunch, could their intention, at its core, be market manipulation? Protecting their ‘investments’ in unsafe and ineffective products, preventing studies comparing a product to a true placebo and not to the immediately prior iteration or adjuvant? Suggest that following the money through all the twists and turns will bring one to disappointing, miserable revelations. Many institutions of higher learning rely on research funded by publicly traded companies; they also may hold investments in those companies in their endowment portfolios. Suggest being disparaged by these biased groups be considered a badge of honor, as it shows one to be considered a dangerous adversary. We need to support and protect those honorable, ethical scientists. Take care.
In today's ACIP meeting, pro-vax "experts" relied heavily on published science papers that supported their views. Got to wonder what happened to those papers that didn't support their views.
Like the meme says, "Of course all scientists agree . . . when you censor the ones that don't".
The system is corrupt. Kevin, thank you for calling it out.
I don’t know if you ever read the substack called TTE, Trust The Evidence, Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson are on the same theme about non disclosure of funding. Man the sharks are out in full force. The corruption runs deep. This must be so frustrating with all the games being played just to stop your very important paper. Do you even get a chance to refute the accusations where it matters?
I'm glad you're speaking out and pushing back against all the deception and trickery. Not many people are in a position to call them out but it's imperative to uncover the truth. The pharma machine has no heart, no soul, and will never back off from the relentless pursuit of money and power.
I don't believe for a minute that the new ACIP review board will be privy to this rebuttal paper aimed at Retraction Watch as it attempts to have have the latest article on DNA contamination retracted. You would think that any and all information relevant to the safety and effectiveness of this product would be front and center and rigorously examined by these "experts". That would be my expectation. I will wait and see what the "experts" decide today. Will they ignore the data and give their blessing to this poison or will they actually do what they were empaneled to do?
Well, they can try to 'retract' my middle finger.
Disgusting 🤬
It’s actually evil
Well done. Here's mine: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/prediction-they-will-try-to-retract
Oh! I’ve subscribed to Retraction Watch for a few years now but had no idea they were fudged . I had a twinge of suspicion about them when they announced that they had found a sponsor.
Wow, that's a lot of expertise and work to keeping the science truthful. I am truly grateful for your commitment.
The WEF or World Enslavement Forum has a trinitarian God also. Their trinity is depopulation, decarbonization, and dehumanization. And they insist the useless eaters pay for all three because they are that clever.
Their modus operandi is to first manufacture the crisis (Covid) than manufacture consent to their solution (never before used on humans m-rna-lnp gene therapy).
Bill Gates, Fauci, Susan Monarez et al all say with certainty that another pandemic is inevitable and soon. They never seem to mention all the biolabs around the world working feverishly on gain of function research as the cause.
But if you take away the time to market advantages of the m-rna-lnp platform (their alleged pandemic solution) than they won’t be able to inject any more poison (disguised as a vaccine) into the people and will have to settle for the number they can maim and kill with just their gain of function pathogens.
Eugenics is such a nasty business especially when you read this expert’s opinion about gain of function research taking place now with reckless abandon.
"There is no scientific benefit that justifies the risk of creating novel human pathogens. None." Simon Wain-Hobson (virologist who first cloned and sequenced HIV)
It's pay-to-play-to-pay-to-play! Dollars and dimes all the way down.
Quoting anything that the Australian TGA claims..is hilarious.
They are bought and paid for by the vaxx manufacturers.
When presented with one of the vaxx manufacturers saying their own products were a form of gene therapy, the TGA tried to argue they did not agree with the manufacturer.
They washed out the death reports here by using the WHO causality assessment framework.
They denied it in a senate hearing..then admitted it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1Ol5cuxnNw
Luckily for them the media here never report facts/science that are detrimental about vaccines because it might encourage "Vaccine hesitancy"..
Hi Kevin, I am wondering whether you could ask the other Kevin (McCairn) if he could look at some other body fluids (not only blood as at present) for evidence of amyloid fibrils. Eg. Saliva, faeces, semen.
This might reveal transmission risks. Thanks.
I know he has found amyloids in CFS in one patient.
You mean "not even a real band", like "The Archies"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3plj_Xplus
Know there is much I do not know, but have nagging questions about ‘investors’ and funding mechanisms for hit pieces. As the funding and investors appear to be an incestuous bunch, could their intention, at its core, be market manipulation? Protecting their ‘investments’ in unsafe and ineffective products, preventing studies comparing a product to a true placebo and not to the immediately prior iteration or adjuvant? Suggest that following the money through all the twists and turns will bring one to disappointing, miserable revelations. Many institutions of higher learning rely on research funded by publicly traded companies; they also may hold investments in those companies in their endowment portfolios. Suggest being disparaged by these biased groups be considered a badge of honor, as it shows one to be considered a dangerous adversary. We need to support and protect those honorable, ethical scientists. Take care.