Commentary on Dr. Mack's Testimony
I couldn't let this one rest unanswered
There is one spot in her reponse that I didnt feel the need to respond to but I will here in writing.
She claims after the DNA gets into the nucleus, it gets destroyed.
Really,
Why is it being found 60 days later in Lymph nodes? (Roltgen)
30 days later in heart tissue? (Krauson)
28 days later in plasma (Castruita)
5 days later in Breast Milk (Hanna)
2-10 days later in Placenta (Gonzalez)
17 months later in cerebral arteries (Ota)
30 days later in muscle (Magen)
15 days later in Blood (Fertig)
Clearly her destruction argument is a farse.
I watched the segment and was struck by the DEI-esqueness of her testimony. As a non-PhD working in academia (unemployed currently), I've witnessed the absolute destruction of science/critical thinking due to these "good at math" un-creative thinkers. I've worked with some good scientists and doctors, but it's not the majority. I wonder if she has a "Trust the Science" poster in her office while she injects babies with a bio-weapon. Probably nothing that a couple bottles of Chardonnay won't fix.
so many of Them go around lying constantly, yet never suffer consequences for it