Thanks very much Kevin. Very interesting topic. I am just getting up to speed with BlockChain. Are you selecting Bitcoin because the system is so robust and has never been compromised? Are there other block chains out there that could be utilized? I believe the video channel Odysee is built on blockchain technology. Thanks again for all your amazing work and for always telling the truth. Peace.
Great post on an important topic if science is ever going to escape its primary filter: "peer-review" journals funded by vested interests.
𝕭𝖎𝖌 𝖕𝕳💩𝖗𝖒💩
𝕭𝖎𝖌 𝕱🤮🤮𝖉
On the other hand, Zuckerberg censorship is today's subtle social media reality, with the first layer filter being the LLMs (Anti•Intelligences), shaping "consensus" politics. Not only are we hearing what is desired, but we are also only desiring what is provided. A la carte doublespeak a la Greenspan with plausible deniability: «𝘐 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘐 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘐'𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘵.»
This is particularly insightful: "Once you realize you can place a hash and a link to scientific papers into BTC and etch them into eternity, you begin to see this is the ideal network to run a “Peer 2 Peer” peer review system, where all reviewer comments can be placed on Nostr or IPFS and hashed and stashed on BTC.
This disintermediates the Journals which are a centralized attack surface to Peer review given their conflicted payments for advertisement from Pharmaceutical companies. In the current system your $3-$10K Article processing fees go to the Journal. They keep the copyright of your work. The reviewers are often anonymous and their review comments are often hidden from the public (not in all journals).【𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨! —𝗮𝗻𝗼𝗻𝘆𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘆】The reviewers get Zero of these Article processing fees."
This was a fascinating construct of another use of the bitcoin chain from investor point of view first of all I will not claim I know that I understand everything how bitcoin works especially How. You can only make 21 million coins and no more that’s a ceiling of it With the rarity of supply demand like gold and silver supply , but you can find another amount mother load different parts of the world will give you more supply supposedly bitcoin it’s 21 million and that is ,
it. I don’t know why it can’t increase down the road to give it more supply
Anyway this was fascinating to find out another more constructive use of the big block chain technology.
PS the way I invest in bitcoin is a proxy through a mining company called marathon holdings MARA there at least I can hedge by using options if something goes wrong and it’s a cheaper way to invest in bitcoin
I used Mara to mine these transactions into a block.
For the amount to increase, everyone using the network would have to agree change the code and increase the number and thus dilute themselves. Wont ever happen.
Thanks for that information on why the increase of the amount coins won’t happen but it is interesting to note that it is possible to increase the amount of coins, even though it’s against their own interest 👍
Or you can just stick with the original protocol, Bitcoin SV, and put as much data on chain as you like. With the latest Teranode software update, miners are able to process over 1 million transactions per second. No chain, including BTC (including Core Developers and the handful of miners with all the hash power), is immune from government intervention.
Thanks very much Kevin. Very interesting topic. I am just getting up to speed with BlockChain. Are you selecting Bitcoin because the system is so robust and has never been compromised? Are there other block chains out there that could be utilized? I believe the video channel Odysee is built on blockchain technology. Thanks again for all your amazing work and for always telling the truth. Peace.
BTC is longest and strongest chain.
Proof of work is an important aspect of BTC that ties it to energy.
Copy that. Thank you.
On the overburdening-with-data of Bitcoin OP:
"The best place to hide a needle is in a pile of needles."
It is just vulnerable to being swamped with crap.
;-(
Great post on an important topic if science is ever going to escape its primary filter: "peer-review" journals funded by vested interests.
𝕭𝖎𝖌 𝖕𝕳💩𝖗𝖒💩
𝕭𝖎𝖌 𝕱🤮🤮𝖉
On the other hand, Zuckerberg censorship is today's subtle social media reality, with the first layer filter being the LLMs (Anti•Intelligences), shaping "consensus" politics. Not only are we hearing what is desired, but we are also only desiring what is provided. A la carte doublespeak a la Greenspan with plausible deniability: «𝘐 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘐 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘐'𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘵.»
This is particularly insightful: "Once you realize you can place a hash and a link to scientific papers into BTC and etch them into eternity, you begin to see this is the ideal network to run a “Peer 2 Peer” peer review system, where all reviewer comments can be placed on Nostr or IPFS and hashed and stashed on BTC.
This disintermediates the Journals which are a centralized attack surface to Peer review given their conflicted payments for advertisement from Pharmaceutical companies. In the current system your $3-$10K Article processing fees go to the Journal. They keep the copyright of your work. The reviewers are often anonymous and their review comments are often hidden from the public (not in all journals).【𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨! —𝗮𝗻𝗼𝗻𝘆𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘆】The reviewers get Zero of these Article processing fees."
This was a fascinating construct of another use of the bitcoin chain from investor point of view first of all I will not claim I know that I understand everything how bitcoin works especially How. You can only make 21 million coins and no more that’s a ceiling of it With the rarity of supply demand like gold and silver supply , but you can find another amount mother load different parts of the world will give you more supply supposedly bitcoin it’s 21 million and that is ,
it. I don’t know why it can’t increase down the road to give it more supply
Anyway this was fascinating to find out another more constructive use of the big block chain technology.
PS the way I invest in bitcoin is a proxy through a mining company called marathon holdings MARA there at least I can hedge by using options if something goes wrong and it’s a cheaper way to invest in bitcoin
I used Mara to mine these transactions into a block.
For the amount to increase, everyone using the network would have to agree change the code and increase the number and thus dilute themselves. Wont ever happen.
Thanks for that information on why the increase of the amount coins won’t happen but it is interesting to note that it is possible to increase the amount of coins, even though it’s against their own interest 👍
Or you can just stick with the original protocol, Bitcoin SV, and put as much data on chain as you like. With the latest Teranode software update, miners are able to process over 1 million transactions per second. No chain, including BTC (including Core Developers and the handful of miners with all the hash power), is immune from government intervention.
No thanks.
BSV is a dead chain.
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin-sv/btc
All digital money can be hacked and shut off...permanently.