The Science of the Religion of Scientism (pseudo science for grant money and political power Theocracy by Lawfare)
One of the most damning indictments against the NIH is the reproducibility crisis. Science is supposed to be built on verifiable, repeatable results, yet the vast majority of research funded by the NIH fails this basic test.
A widely cited survey in the journal Nature found that a staggering 70% of scientists surveyed reported failing to reproduce published research. Worse still, in a landmark study by Dr. Glenn Begley, only 11% of oncology studies that were reviewed could be replicated—meaning that 89% of these supposedly groundbreaking cancer studies were essentially worthless.
Your observations are correct. Run across a number of non-repeatable results in my field - parasitology (retired microbiologist).
Always been rather glad to see that 2 of my observations have been repeated by others - one without reference, and the other very well known in my narrow area of African trypanosomes.
In our study, in situ hybridization detected both mRNA derived from the vaccine and mRNA from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This suggests that the observed spike protein positive staining in patients with a history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but no documented history of viral infection, cannot definitively be attributed to the vaccine alone. Notably, the nucleocapsid protein was consistently negative across cases, supporting the notion that our in situ hybridization method has high sensitivity and could detect trace amounts of mRNA, possibly reflecting unrecognized asymptomatic infections. These findings emphasize the need for caution in interpreting the presence of spike protein as exclusively vaccine-
related."
To probe for matching synthetic N1-methylpseudouridine mod mRNA with complementary mRNA in a hybridization while watching resulting Spike distribution would need to result in detecting the 2 single mutations -KV- versus -PP- in the probes. I'm not sure this 'tiny' difference is suitable for such a technique. That's why no nucleocapsid from the real virus, maybe... Why not to do the real sequencing? Maybe because it would only show the SPike from the shots...
Assume that everyone has been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 viruses of various generations.
Also assume that everyone has been exposed to circulating non-SARS coronaviruses.
Then think about the viral encounter at the mucosal level.
Coronavirus components of previously encountered varieties are detected and neutralised by mucosal IgA . SARS-types are not cleared as efficiently so can reproduce and shed mRNA.
Pre-existing circulating IgG/IgM non-SARS N protein antibodies and mRNA antibodies should clear the SARS N-proteins preferentially over the SARS spikes, leaving some spike proteins and mRNA from symptomatic or asymptomatic infection. The SARS N proteins should clear with non-SARS antibodies, it is the spike with is engineered and novel. This might explain the absence of SARS-type N in the tissues.
Probing tissues for pseudo-mRNA might not be necessary if you had antibodies which could differentiate the -PP- vaccinial spikes from the wild -KV- spikes. If your sensitivity was adequate you could differentiate the two spikes quite effectively.
Thank you for thinking about this paper and your comment.
'octogenarians' ??? First time ever hear this 'concept' describing humans..?
"We urgently need studies to understand how much DNA is tolerable in LNP based vaccines."
These are NOT 'vaccines', Kevin you know it very well... And now a suggestion to study the 'tolerance' of what? How deeply you can get GMOed and when you reach a border of not being a human any more, once enough LNPs cross the entire pool of stem cells? All according to the 'limit' level of FOREIGN DNA/RNA being mixed up with HUMAN DNA? THis is NOT med-I-sin-e, it is called EUGENICS.
PLEASE, use a language that mob (those Carlin is talking to) can understand and take full consequences of. For that language 'vaccines'=GENE THERAPIES, conforming with FDA rules, scientists/MD's are allowed to keep their jobs or at least live safely..., maybe?
The recent interview with Dr. Patrick Soon-toBeTheCancerGuru(?), put that antibody medical DOGMA very much into question. The Spike, 1273 aa's, with all its epitopes after the slow chew, is resembling MANY human parts, some of them so essential as for example the tripeptide 'RGD', or even every single aromatic residue being a startup for a new neurotransmitter, all introducing a very questionable plot of all sorts of new interactions everywhere where the Spike persists... For example releasing glutamine has an impact on neurotransmission, and there are 66 of them in the spike..
That's why NO HUMAN EXPERIMENTING with any sort of genetic material reprogramming the human bodies to become what, patentable while carrying these genes??? Just my point of view.
Btw. in my own family we had THREE deaths of >80 years old jabbed.. It was/is a tragedy. with the younger jabbed generation suffering all sorts of conditions requiring surgery, medical attention, with lot of bone issues.. We do not need any paper to know now that we are dealing with a crime... There are many families though where there were no issues. That's why have to ask: Are specific pools of genes being targeted here, maybe???
The "protect the elderly" argument was politically necessary to recruit the self-interest of the large boomer population, to maximise population support for mass vaxxing.
Also trending is "vaxx the kids to protect the elderly". This is a new development in medicine: we will subject a healthy person to risk - without benefit to them - for the supposed benefit of a different person.
So now we are prepared to sacrifice kids - without benefit to them - to reassure a large self-interested elderly voting bloc whom we have previously fear-mongered. A few people make $$$ from this process. Rinse and repeat.
100% the spike protein is still being expressed in the vaxxed.
I know because I ended up getting tapped by the universe to become one of the 'canaries,' as it were. I'm very sensitive to the shedding. Not sure why because in my life I'm not usually a person that gets sick or has health issues. It might be because I got such a massive dose when the shots first rolled out, as a bodyworker, and then my body reacted in a sort of 'allergic' way to the foreign proteins. So yes, 100%, everyone who got the vax is still shedding, more or less. Those who both sweat and bathe a lot manage their shedding; also I know a man who got vaxxed and now is aggressively trying to clear his body of the shedding and my experience working with him is that he has indeed has a great measure of success in this endeavor, at least in reducing the levels. ALL vaxxed shed via breath and skin (the skin is the largest detox organ in the body). The spike proteins remain viable on surfaces for months (or years) after a vaxxed person has touched them, even on smooth surfaces outdoors such as scaffolding. Ordinary soap and water and a scrubby sponge can be used to clean them off.
Based upon what I am observing around me, other people are suffering health effects from the shedding as well, but because their symptoms are sub-clinical, they don't understand that they are being continuously poisoned.
All gene therapy products shed; however natural mRNA will break down in a few weeks. Modified RNA products need to be permanently BANNED where the foreign protein being generated is 'stabilized.'
I forbade my 50-year wife (3 times, six weeks apart) from taking the shots before they rolled out in my area. Over the course of about a year she had taken 3 shots. During that year she was out of the house 10 hours daily, three days in a row (at pre-retirement work); then home the rest of the week. My not knowing she had those shots, I began to notice a strange lack of personal wellness pattern (night chills, unusual lethargy). Half-a-week I felt "well enough", sort of like normal for a 70 year old. The rest of the week I felt "less than well". This pattern lasted over 2.25 years before it seemed to vanish. BTW we were sleeping in separate bedrooms during that. She had Rheumatoid Arthritis at age 11 and now Osteoarthritis. She said when I rolled over it bounced the bed too much and hurt her back. AMIDWESTERN DOCTOR suggested that 15% of USA population may be sensitive to shedding (of any shot). He also made mention of his view of the 3 worst ever shots: Anthrax, Smallpox, and Gardasil. I got 23 shots shoved into 6 needles within one hour pre-deployment to the Desert Storm War (Iraq). I think those military shots sensitized my body to be quickly sensitive to even mild shedding, and instantaneously sensitive to heavy shedding (happened twice 14 days apart from a 5 second handshake both times).
I'm sincerely astonished by your experience and especially pleased that you seem to be getting well with great effort. Bravo.
Do you know many others like you in terms of the sensitivity of others shedding? I'm unvaxxed and can NOT pick this up yet I always can sense if people are 'not well' (it's a scent/breath/voice thing that I detect, like a hyper survival instinct)...what exactly are you 'sensing' if you don't mind me asking. And do you recommend avoiding crowded rooms, how do you manage your social life (because I enjoy being around alot of people). Thank you.
... no reports of longterm consequences from the cvid vx.
That is a true statement ... in Ocean Quahog years (they live 500 years according to Grok). Longterm in Ocean Quahog years is at least 50 years. Covid vaxes can't have any longterm consequences yet because they haven't been around longterm.
Otherwise, I can prove that consequences are stark, many, fatal, disastrous, and hidden by government. These oligarchs are demons walking the earth
It has been 4 years now and the covid-vaxxed have been shedding whatever it is to the covid-unvaxxed the entire time so I think most of these comparison studies are nearly meaningless now.
People in all western countries with high jab rates have found this now for years, so its not like its new news, its just the kind of news people would rather ignore and hope it goes away.
Plus 'established' science still does not even acknowledge some of the more 'conspiratorial' Yet True facts about these injections...
like that the jabbed are now emitting bluetooth MAC addresses or that there is a magnetism-like phenomenon that the jabbed can shed to the unjabbed. Totally True, Easily verifiable, Crickets.
But if you read AFL's CDC Production 1 FOIA release, Every Single One of those things are totally true, and they knew it all along; escaped from a lab, human-to-human aerosol transmission, fertility issues, shedding, the magnetism-like phenomenon they had to truthblur to 'microchips in the vaxx', the BT MAC ID's, some more facts I have forgotten because they are taken for granted now... Which is Why they censored people for saying them.
And given the rate of degradation of peoples blood and the self-replication of the nanotechnology, as seen by people like Dr Ana and David Nixon and Karl C and many others over the past 4 years, I think it is more likely there will be a catastrophic negative health outcome for most people well before we ever learn the real truth of what they have done to us All.
I wonder if anyone has has found the Pfizer and Moderna DNA integrations in the unvaxxed yet? Or perhaps it can still be gotten rid of.
Nonetheless I enjoy your work and wish you luck. We all need it now but thank you for releasing the information that you did, it is not easy to swim upstream against such a massive tide of opposition/Evil but you did it nonetheless.
The Science of the Religion of Scientism (pseudo science for grant money and political power Theocracy by Lawfare)
One of the most damning indictments against the NIH is the reproducibility crisis. Science is supposed to be built on verifiable, repeatable results, yet the vast majority of research funded by the NIH fails this basic test.
A widely cited survey in the journal Nature found that a staggering 70% of scientists surveyed reported failing to reproduce published research. Worse still, in a landmark study by Dr. Glenn Begley, only 11% of oncology studies that were reviewed could be replicated—meaning that 89% of these supposedly groundbreaking cancer studies were essentially worthless.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/04/03/exposing-nih-funded-research-why-blowing-whistle-corruption/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Your observations are correct. Run across a number of non-repeatable results in my field - parasitology (retired microbiologist).
Always been rather glad to see that 2 of my observations have been repeated by others - one without reference, and the other very well known in my narrow area of African trypanosomes.
Take it all off the market, it kills people.
Why no nucleocapsid from the viral mRNA?
maybe because it's not viral mRNA..
Was it viral ‘in order to get published’ mRNA? or what? It seems like an odd tactic that was used.
they admit, towards the end, long quote, sorry:
"5. Limitation of the study
In our study, in situ hybridization detected both mRNA derived from the vaccine and mRNA from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This suggests that the observed spike protein positive staining in patients with a history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but no documented history of viral infection, cannot definitively be attributed to the vaccine alone. Notably, the nucleocapsid protein was consistently negative across cases, supporting the notion that our in situ hybridization method has high sensitivity and could detect trace amounts of mRNA, possibly reflecting unrecognized asymptomatic infections. These findings emphasize the need for caution in interpreting the presence of spike protein as exclusively vaccine-
related."
To probe for matching synthetic N1-methylpseudouridine mod mRNA with complementary mRNA in a hybridization while watching resulting Spike distribution would need to result in detecting the 2 single mutations -KV- versus -PP- in the probes. I'm not sure this 'tiny' difference is suitable for such a technique. That's why no nucleocapsid from the real virus, maybe... Why not to do the real sequencing? Maybe because it would only show the SPike from the shots...
Thank you.
Another possibility:
Assume that everyone has been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 viruses of various generations.
Also assume that everyone has been exposed to circulating non-SARS coronaviruses.
Then think about the viral encounter at the mucosal level.
Coronavirus components of previously encountered varieties are detected and neutralised by mucosal IgA . SARS-types are not cleared as efficiently so can reproduce and shed mRNA.
Pre-existing circulating IgG/IgM non-SARS N protein antibodies and mRNA antibodies should clear the SARS N-proteins preferentially over the SARS spikes, leaving some spike proteins and mRNA from symptomatic or asymptomatic infection. The SARS N proteins should clear with non-SARS antibodies, it is the spike with is engineered and novel. This might explain the absence of SARS-type N in the tissues.
Probing tissues for pseudo-mRNA might not be necessary if you had antibodies which could differentiate the -PP- vaccinial spikes from the wild -KV- spikes. If your sensitivity was adequate you could differentiate the two spikes quite effectively.
Thank you for thinking about this paper and your comment.
'octogenarians' ??? First time ever hear this 'concept' describing humans..?
"We urgently need studies to understand how much DNA is tolerable in LNP based vaccines."
These are NOT 'vaccines', Kevin you know it very well... And now a suggestion to study the 'tolerance' of what? How deeply you can get GMOed and when you reach a border of not being a human any more, once enough LNPs cross the entire pool of stem cells? All according to the 'limit' level of FOREIGN DNA/RNA being mixed up with HUMAN DNA? THis is NOT med-I-sin-e, it is called EUGENICS.
PLEASE, use a language that mob (those Carlin is talking to) can understand and take full consequences of. For that language 'vaccines'=GENE THERAPIES, conforming with FDA rules, scientists/MD's are allowed to keep their jobs or at least live safely..., maybe?
The recent interview with Dr. Patrick Soon-toBeTheCancerGuru(?), put that antibody medical DOGMA very much into question. The Spike, 1273 aa's, with all its epitopes after the slow chew, is resembling MANY human parts, some of them so essential as for example the tripeptide 'RGD', or even every single aromatic residue being a startup for a new neurotransmitter, all introducing a very questionable plot of all sorts of new interactions everywhere where the Spike persists... For example releasing glutamine has an impact on neurotransmission, and there are 66 of them in the spike..
That's why NO HUMAN EXPERIMENTING with any sort of genetic material reprogramming the human bodies to become what, patentable while carrying these genes??? Just my point of view.
Btw. in my own family we had THREE deaths of >80 years old jabbed.. It was/is a tragedy. with the younger jabbed generation suffering all sorts of conditions requiring surgery, medical attention, with lot of bone issues.. We do not need any paper to know now that we are dealing with a crime... There are many families though where there were no issues. That's why have to ask: Are specific pools of genes being targeted here, maybe???
Thank you for allowing posting comments!
How many long-term studies have there been of Spike-protein production in humans?
1,000+ days seems like a long time to produce what some claim is a cytotoxic protein.
The "protect the elderly" argument was politically necessary to recruit the self-interest of the large boomer population, to maximise population support for mass vaxxing.
Also trending is "vaxx the kids to protect the elderly". This is a new development in medicine: we will subject a healthy person to risk - without benefit to them - for the supposed benefit of a different person.
So now we are prepared to sacrifice kids - without benefit to them - to reassure a large self-interested elderly voting bloc whom we have previously fear-mongered. A few people make $$$ from this process. Rinse and repeat.
Welcome to "public health" in the 21st century.
Sacrificing kids for the adults...imagine a culture so wicked, it sacrifices their young and unborn. What an odd religious practice, no?
100% the spike protein is still being expressed in the vaxxed.
I know because I ended up getting tapped by the universe to become one of the 'canaries,' as it were. I'm very sensitive to the shedding. Not sure why because in my life I'm not usually a person that gets sick or has health issues. It might be because I got such a massive dose when the shots first rolled out, as a bodyworker, and then my body reacted in a sort of 'allergic' way to the foreign proteins. So yes, 100%, everyone who got the vax is still shedding, more or less. Those who both sweat and bathe a lot manage their shedding; also I know a man who got vaxxed and now is aggressively trying to clear his body of the shedding and my experience working with him is that he has indeed has a great measure of success in this endeavor, at least in reducing the levels. ALL vaxxed shed via breath and skin (the skin is the largest detox organ in the body). The spike proteins remain viable on surfaces for months (or years) after a vaxxed person has touched them, even on smooth surfaces outdoors such as scaffolding. Ordinary soap and water and a scrubby sponge can be used to clean them off.
Based upon what I am observing around me, other people are suffering health effects from the shedding as well, but because their symptoms are sub-clinical, they don't understand that they are being continuously poisoned.
All gene therapy products shed; however natural mRNA will break down in a few weeks. Modified RNA products need to be permanently BANNED where the foreign protein being generated is 'stabilized.'
I forbade my 50-year wife (3 times, six weeks apart) from taking the shots before they rolled out in my area. Over the course of about a year she had taken 3 shots. During that year she was out of the house 10 hours daily, three days in a row (at pre-retirement work); then home the rest of the week. My not knowing she had those shots, I began to notice a strange lack of personal wellness pattern (night chills, unusual lethargy). Half-a-week I felt "well enough", sort of like normal for a 70 year old. The rest of the week I felt "less than well". This pattern lasted over 2.25 years before it seemed to vanish. BTW we were sleeping in separate bedrooms during that. She had Rheumatoid Arthritis at age 11 and now Osteoarthritis. She said when I rolled over it bounced the bed too much and hurt her back. AMIDWESTERN DOCTOR suggested that 15% of USA population may be sensitive to shedding (of any shot). He also made mention of his view of the 3 worst ever shots: Anthrax, Smallpox, and Gardasil. I got 23 shots shoved into 6 needles within one hour pre-deployment to the Desert Storm War (Iraq). I think those military shots sensitized my body to be quickly sensitive to even mild shedding, and instantaneously sensitive to heavy shedding (happened twice 14 days apart from a 5 second handshake both times).
I'm sincerely astonished by your experience and especially pleased that you seem to be getting well with great effort. Bravo.
Do you know many others like you in terms of the sensitivity of others shedding? I'm unvaxxed and can NOT pick this up yet I always can sense if people are 'not well' (it's a scent/breath/voice thing that I detect, like a hyper survival instinct)...what exactly are you 'sensing' if you don't mind me asking. And do you recommend avoiding crowded rooms, how do you manage your social life (because I enjoy being around alot of people). Thank you.
Thanks for the continued hard work Kevin!
I hope some day soon there is a test to measure the circular DNA in the vaccines.
Just seeing this now.
... no reports of longterm consequences from the cvid vx.
That is a true statement ... in Ocean Quahog years (they live 500 years according to Grok). Longterm in Ocean Quahog years is at least 50 years. Covid vaxes can't have any longterm consequences yet because they haven't been around longterm.
Otherwise, I can prove that consequences are stark, many, fatal, disastrous, and hidden by government. These oligarchs are demons walking the earth
Please, how can one explain a rather "narrow area" of the S-protein found around Circulus Willisi?
Why not in the caudal area of the brain, like pons, cerebellum?
Please, how can one explain a rather "narrow area" of the S-protein found around Circulus Willisi?
Why not in the caudal area of the brain, like pons, cerebellum?
It has been 4 years now and the covid-vaxxed have been shedding whatever it is to the covid-unvaxxed the entire time so I think most of these comparison studies are nearly meaningless now.
People in all western countries with high jab rates have found this now for years, so its not like its new news, its just the kind of news people would rather ignore and hope it goes away.
Plus 'established' science still does not even acknowledge some of the more 'conspiratorial' Yet True facts about these injections...
like that the jabbed are now emitting bluetooth MAC addresses or that there is a magnetism-like phenomenon that the jabbed can shed to the unjabbed. Totally True, Easily verifiable, Crickets.
But if you read AFL's CDC Production 1 FOIA release, Every Single One of those things are totally true, and they knew it all along; escaped from a lab, human-to-human aerosol transmission, fertility issues, shedding, the magnetism-like phenomenon they had to truthblur to 'microchips in the vaxx', the BT MAC ID's, some more facts I have forgotten because they are taken for granted now... Which is Why they censored people for saying them.
https://aflegal.org/case/21-01575-foia/
And given the rate of degradation of peoples blood and the self-replication of the nanotechnology, as seen by people like Dr Ana and David Nixon and Karl C and many others over the past 4 years, I think it is more likely there will be a catastrophic negative health outcome for most people well before we ever learn the real truth of what they have done to us All.
I wonder if anyone has has found the Pfizer and Moderna DNA integrations in the unvaxxed yet? Or perhaps it can still be gotten rid of.
Nonetheless I enjoy your work and wish you luck. We all need it now but thank you for releasing the information that you did, it is not easy to swim upstream against such a massive tide of opposition/Evil but you did it nonetheless.
Thank you Kevin.
There's no Covid. They made it up. There's no cause and no end. Only the response,
They. Made. It. Up.
The modRNA gene therapy is going to elicit IgG Abs, I believe, but not many of those make it to the mucosa. For that you want IgA Abs.
In addition, this paper suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is so big it really does not want to get stuck in your mucosa anyway:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36580912/
Perhaps PAK1 blockers are the way to go, not the modRNA gene therapy.