33 Comments
User's avatar
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

It was on purpose, premeditated. You go to such lengths as a research scientist to prove this . Kudos to you for your integrity and your intellectual curiosity to prove what was done to mankind . Sad part, they are still on the market and the ACOG still wants every pregnant woman jabbed . We are witnessing the greatest crime. I don’t believe mistakes were made .

rjt's avatar

Dear Brandon,

I tried to send you a message a couple of weeks ago but keep being spat out by Substack because my "handle contains too few letters", or something. No human contact, and one can't negotiate with the AS (artificial stupid.)

So, Happy New Year.

Since the onslaught of the plandemic have you been able to track live births, miscarriages, stillbirths, or foetal demise on any useful scale? In a non-numerate population (the arithmetic equivalent of illiterate) it is challenging to convince anyone of the data. On an individual GP practice of maybe 1500 patients the incremental deaths from a 1:850 fatal shot merge into the background noise, and as an obstetrician if you deliver 400 babies a year 390 does not feel much different than 410. One clinic nurse a couple of years ago told me that the consulting cardiologists' staff reported about a threefold increase in volume of referrals.

I have not been able to find local or current VIHA (Island Health) reports (last infant mortality report had 61 from 2020-2022, about 3.4 per thousand live births).The provincial totals which I checked last month showed about 10% drop in total births in 2021 and 2022, again not really noticeable on a local scale. It would be very interesting and informative to have an opinion from somebody still working on the front line as data reporting from official sources is always "seasonally adjusted" or otherwise dubious.

Regards,R

John Day MD's avatar

When being forced to ask questions that you do not want to know the answer to, you must sometimes ask a different question, instead, so that you can get a different answer, which will not cause you harm or loss.

You must pretend that you asked the question you did not want the answer to, or this strategem will fail...

Viking's avatar

Yes, John and Brandon you’re both absolutely correct Brandon you’re right though. There was no mistakes made they want to cull 95% of us what they call useless eaters!

rjt's avatar

It is challenging to teach medical students time factors. Some things you just need to observe over a few years (or decades) to appreciate.

Similarly here, the cull has a prolonged effect with the fertility decrease which will only be evident after a couple of decades (and blamed on climate change.) The effects of the Chinese One-child policy are just manifesting now, and there are similar concerns about demographics and replacement in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. This has been concealed in the white democracies with the rampant immigration of non-European populations.

John Day MD's avatar

They want a slow, imperceptible cull, useless-eaters on benefits first, please...

;-/

They need to sustain industrial economy, the goose that lays their golden eggs.

Vivien C Buckley's avatar

John, I’m with you on this one 100%.

Konrad's avatar

I have previously debated Mike Yeardon elsewhere that "intending harm" could be a misinterpretation of "not caring about harm" Horribly, I am beginning to suspect Mike may be right.

They clearly always intended to use Process 2 for mass production, but used the cleaner Process 1 for the trials.

They knew Process 2 would result in DNA contamination inside the LNPs they couldn't profitably eliminate.

They took measures to hide the extent and type of DNA contamination from regulators.

They knew biodistribution of the LNPs would be systemic, and LNPs would deliver the DNA contamination to cells all over the body undergoing Mitosis and Meiosis, when cell nucleus divides and cell DNA is exposed.

They knew their S1 protein target was cytotoxic via various vectors. (Just from virus patients even before the jab was made).

They knew before anyone was jabbed that S1 could cause P53 suppression. (Why else fight to retract the first paper before any jab juice had been produced?)

They knew about the ribosome frame shifting due to pseudouridating their mod-RNA and the misfolded proteins (why else photoshop the western blot test?).

I'm starting to think Mike Yeardon has point worth considering ...

Creator's avatar

Tobias Unruh claimed they didn't even know that LNP are liquid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38514237/

Collapse Podcast's avatar

I remember reading this around Nov 21

https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056

The one you referring to?

The Offsc℞ipt Pharmacist's avatar

Kevin. I think they use fluorometry for RNA content because they use it measures RNA encapsulation rate at the same time. Interestingly, for the XBB lots, they used ddPCR for testing 'identity of the RNA' whereas they used qPCR for previous lots. I asked for an ATIP on the lot CQA and much is redacted (natch!) but you may find it useful nonetheless. Documented on my substack here: https://mariagutschi.substack.com/p/an-atip-on-lot-releases The amount of testing on the LNPs that Moderna did (but not Pfizer) is very interesting to me.

Anandamide's avatar

I’d love to see the protocol that dose that as we get 2-5X more signal when we add TritonX and heat to the vaccines and I don’t know enough about how permeable the LNPs are to these dyes.

I know the enzymes don’t get in as I’ve tried that and they are higher molecular weight than those dyes

Elaine Mc Guinness's avatar

Keep going Kevin. It is quite clear that the evidence is fully there for the atrocity committed upon humanity in the name of greed, fear and corruption. It is also quite apparent that ethics, transparency and morality don't come into play when human lives can still be saved. Literally turning a blind eye is wat these manufacturers are doing and to make it worse. they are pointing the regulators off-track. You would think that regulators have enough qualified people to be independent in their own investigations, without relying on tips from the manufacturers. DNA is complex, more than we realise. When you talk about copies, LNP, mRNA, miscalculation based on ignorance, assumptions or lack of knowledge the damage to the human genome.is undeniable and will go down in history. While nature itself will destroy what is not itself ultimately, the amount of suffering that humanity has, is and will go through is beyond measure. Compassion, Love and Connection is what we each must endeavour to cultivate now for ourselves and each other in this world we find ourselves in, as a result of the fallout. It has already happened. Now, people like you Kevin are proving this could have been avoided if the right action had been taken from the start. The business model of competition, power and corruption will disintegrate in time because it seems that humanity has learned this hard lesson the hard way. Peace and love to all on earth 🌎 Thisvis the only way.

Marty Ellenbecker's avatar

As Pharmediament smells it's demise, it will use increasingly slippery tricks to deceive.

I get the gist of this ploy & the previous slimy paper. But many people

- unfamiliar with these bastards - need to be made aware.

, .

This video, watched with headphones, did not have the sound clarity to convey every important detial. Taking down the scum will require everyone we can muster.

Make every video message count -USE CAPTIONS!

Steve's avatar

Thank you Kevin. It's criminal and it's pure evil. The mRNA trash must go. Peace.

Vivien C Buckley's avatar

The pharmaceutical industry is known for its seedy deceptions in trialling, statistics, outcomes, lawsuits etc., so why do regulatory agencies keep going back to the pig trough for answers to needed enlightening questions? Surely regulators know what kind of psychopathic people they are dealing with. None of it makes sense, unless they’re tied at the hip. I am very happy Kevin, that you try to educate the people who have some understanding on this complicated subject. The entity is working overtime to squash the truth, to even go as far to cyber hack Wafik S El Deiry’s paper. I appreciate all that you are doing and hope one day it will be recognized.

swisstrader's avatar

As someone who has been severely harmed by vaccination (rapidly progressing cancer in my throat, nose, and skull base), it is almost unbelievable what these criminals have done with intent.

One more reason to take BNT/PFC all the way to the Supreme Court of Germany.

John R. Carroll's avatar

This is so messed up I lived in a disgusting Massachusetts Department of Mental Health group home at 64/66 Marguerite Avenue during this ruse in 2020 and they FORCED us to get the shots or they would LOCK US IN OUR ROOMS! 3 shots deep im so fucking screwed im going to need a lawyer to sue these viciously evil public health officials!!! I should have stood my ground. Learn from my mistakes. I can't wait to sue the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health over this shit!!

Being a Nancy's avatar

I heard it fine just on my phone speaker and walk around getting ready for work.

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

The last 5 years has been a living hell . Trends caught my eye. For example, if I get a call from the emergency department once a shift for a fetal demise and now I get 3 per shift , I knew something new was going on . The only thing new were the jabs . The pregnancy rate in the office is down about 40%. . You can’t unsee what has happened and it is all very sad .

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Rjt , I tried to send a message and get locked out sometimes, not sure if substack is compromised.😪

Bela's avatar

Guy's going on about viruses. Viruses don't exist.

Non scientific bollox.

Mate I suggest you have a good long chat to Stephan Lanka.

Collapse Podcast's avatar

Semantics at this point. Call it a pathogen if it makes you feel better.

Bela's avatar

It's not just semantics, it's misleading.

Crixcyon's avatar

All drugs, vaccines and mRNA poisons are premeditated. In what universe has any of them provided unbounded health?

mejbcart's avatar

From 1979 book titled: "A double IMage of a Double Helix. The Recombinant DNA Debate' by Clifford Grobstein from UC San Diego, quote:

"The viruses particularly must not be pathogenic for humans or capable of spread in natural environments. Only two animal viruses are approved under NIH guidelines as meeting these requirements at the present time. One known as SV-40, was originally derived from monkey cell in laboratory culture and has been extensively studied because it produces cancer in animals or cancerlike changes in laboratory cultured animal cells." The second 'allowed' virus was polyoma virus, derived from mouse, and was shown to induce tumors on inoculation into newborn mice!

ANyone cancer statistics ever since 1980's???