They KNOW this could kill the mod-mRNA Covid "vaccines". But actually, they are less concerned about that and more concerned about the future of the mRNA platform - which is the real reason they are fighting tooth and nail to concede nothing and stay with the "safe and effective" mantra.
Once the manufacturing technology is in place, nRNA products cost almost nothing to produce (especially if the purification phase is, let's say, "minimized". The "raw material is E.Coli bacteria.
So in applying this technology to future "Vaccine" "Upgrades", gene therapies and others, there are BIllions of profits at stake.
That's the real reason they are refusing to give ground, as well as still covering-up the involvement of the Military and Global Governments in the Covid psyop.
I agree, it’s about the wealthy investments in the mRNA technology. Also, maybe they steal technology promoted by others to perfect their product. I thought it curious that in 2021 the NIH flew 21 or 22 vaccine injured people to their building and conducted many tests including taking spinal fluid. This was all under the guise of helping the injured but the research came to an abrupt halt with no explanation. The participants mentioned that the samples were frozen. Was this all an endeavour to tweak the product to make it safer?
Indeed these creatures have been effectively committing such limited genocidal acts as the Covid19 Coup D'état for multiple generations. It is the establishment of mRNA platform itself that was always the primary goal, that goes well beyond mere genocide of a few hundren million plebs.
This is likely not simply an End Game event but more accurately an End Time event similar of to that of the murky history of the end of the world empire of Atlantis, and cyclic "natural" disasters indicative of Earth currently loosing the protection of it's Electromagnetic field.
This appears to be the final decade of of preparation by the Khazarian parasitic infestation of the human genome, cementing their position of dominants over (more) natural human beings, and their intended inheritance of the Earth at the expense of wholesome human civilisation.
“They have to invent new methods to detect and eliminate these nucleic acids once LNPs are involved. Same holds true for your immune system but they don’t want talk about that elephant in the room.”
This👆 that’s why we don’t have compendial standards yet and need an orthogonal method or two for just about every attribute. If you don’t know how to reliably measure, what to measure or if the measurement reflects reality, then why are we using this platform?
Problem: Comirnaty and Spikevax use 100 % N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) instead of uridine - this makes modRNA more stable against RNases. They say “RNase removes RNA” - but studies show that m1Ψ strongly inhibits hydrolysis by RNase A (which they presumably use).
Consequence: if RNase fails (or is only partially effective), modRNA remains in the sample - Qubit then measures RNA residues as DNA (overestimation) or overlooks ssDNA (underestimation). Their “100-fold reduction” is questionable - perhaps they only degraded a fraction of RNA.
2) Qubit weakness in hybrids/ssDNA:
Problem: Even with RNase, DNA-RNA hybrids (e.g. from production) or ssDNA (fragmented plasmid residues) could remain. Qubit HS DNA Assay is optimized for dsDNA - only 20-50 % of ssDNA is detected.
Evidence: Your spike-in tests (lambda DNA) show saturation - with modRNA (30-100 µg) plus DNA the signal could be chaotic. RNase-resistant modRNA amplifies this.
Consequence: 0-12.6 ng DNA sounds clean, but if ssDNA or hybrids are present, it's unreliable - they ignore it.
3) Phenol-chloroform as a “cure”:
Problem: They say lipids (e.g. ALC-0315) interfere with RNase or Qubit - phenol-chloroform is supposed to solve it. But:
Phenol-chloroform is not 100 % quantitative with LNPs - lipophilic residues (secondary amines from degradation) could interact with nucleic acids.
Ethanol precipitation loses small fragments (<50 bp) generated during DNase-treated production.
Consequence: your “clean” 35-55 ng might underestimate - real DNA (ssDNA, fragments) is lost or masked.
4) LC-MS as confirmation?
Problem: LC-MS shows 1000x more RNA than DNA - but they hydrolyzed with nuclease P1 and phosphodiesterase, which also degrade m1Ψ-RNA only slowly . If modRNA remains intact, DNA is underestimated.
Consequence: LC-MS and Qubit agree because both have the same weakness - they see modRNA dominance but not the true amount of DNA.
Data fudge:
Problem: 10 µg vs. 20 µg RNase changes DNA levels (12.6 ng vs. lower) - they admit this but wipe it away. This screams inconsistency - how much RNA really remains?
Consequence: their “purification” is arbitrary - no standardization, no guarantee that modRNA is gone.
Wow! I even got some of the points Kevin mentioned.
You wrote "If modRNA remains intact, DNA is underestimated."
Why is DNA underestimated?
If modRNA remains intact, nucleosides from RNA are decreased, the ratio of RNA to DNA is underestimated, and then the apparent DNA value will be increased.
If modRNA remains intact, it can still bind fluorescence dyes like those in the Qubit assay, which are supposed to detect DNA. This creates a false signal, inflating the apparent DNA value. But because Kaiser et al. assume all RNA is gone and measure only 'DNA,' any intact modRNA masks the true DNA amount, leading to an underestimation of actual DNA contamination. Your point about nucleosides and ratios applies to LC-MS, where intact modRNA reduces RNA nucleoside detection, skewing the RNA:DNA ratio—but for Qubit, it’s about fluorescence binding, not nucleosides.
That's the joke hard to get how they mess up and sell you bullshit as science.
And now think it to the end: So if you have small fragments 10 - 75 BP they won't bind cause cloaked due to modRNA. So in the end you underestimate the amount.
And even better: if plasmid (supercoiled) you will also have a problem.
Trying last time to explain that you ignore reality.
Look, the real issue is size and binding: DNA fragments (10-75 bp) are tiny compared to a half or whole modRNA strand (hundreds to thousands of bases). If modRNA hangs around—thanks to m1Ψ resisting RNase—it can bind to these small DNA fragments, especially ssDNA, through partial hybridization or electrostatic messiness. That slashes their availability to bind Qubit’s fluorescence dye, which already sucks at detecting ssDNA (20-50% efficiency). So, while intact modRNA lights up the assay and inflates the raw ‘DNA’ signal, the real DNA fragments—potentially way more numerous—get cloaked by modRNA and go underdetected. Kaiser et al. call it all ‘DNA,’ but they’re blind to what’s actually there. Quantification? Forget it—the numbers don’t add up because you can’t tease apart what’s bound versus free. And then Qubit’s saturation kicks in: at high nucleic acid loads (30-100 µg modRNA), the dye hits a ceiling, flattening the signal and masking any nuance between modRNA and DNA fragments. It’s a double whammy—overestimation of junk, underestimation of the real stuff. Their method’s a joke.
Qubit’s optimized for dsDNA, sure, but who knows what’s in these LNPs—ssDNA, dsDNA, tiny fragments, or coiled plasmids? It’s a mess. Qubit ignores ssDNA half the time (20-50% efficiency) yet still binds modRNA, pumping up the signal with junk while missing the real DNA. You’re stuck with a test that’s both blind and sloppy. Switching to qPCR and ddPCR makes way more sense—they’re sequence-specific, amplify what’s actually there, and don’t care about modRNA fluorescence nonsense. ddPCR especially, with its absolute quantification, could nail the DNA copy number, no saturation bullshit. Kaiser et al. should’ve ditched Qubit for that combo—it’s closer to reality than their glow-in-the-dark guessing game.
You see the authors of that Kaiser paper and what University they're all out of? Ya, big F*($*ing surprise there, lol. Same University that Prof. Dr Christian Drosten came out of. Remember Drosten? That's the POS who woefully manipulated the PCR test to scream positive: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7095456/ . They used the PCR test, and false death counting, to create the illusion of a pandemic. As far as proving guilt for the crimes against humanity, the manipulation of the PCR test is a slam dunk all by itself. Nevermind the fact it's not supposed to be used for diagnoses (alone), the fact it was massively overcycled screams a 'nefarious plot' was at play. During the beginning of "Operation Covid-19", the Deputy Cheif Microbioligist of Public Health Ontario (Canada) was quoted: "...any indication of the virus in a sample is important, regardless of how many cycles it took to find." (https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/About/News/2021/Explained-COVID19-PCR-Testing-and-Cycle-Thresholds). In Ontario they were cycling it up to 42 times!!! For a real laugh you can go on youtube and watch an instructional video about chosing the right cycle count for the PCR test. Notice were 42 cycles is on the chart?....ya, it's not there because it's off scale : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_xsuRQIM9M
After 30 cycles the PCR test is garbage, as overcycling causes the test to be non specific.....let it glow, let it glow, let it glow.
And over-cycling the PCR allowed them to prove asymptomatic spread and infection which accelerated public panic and obeisance because only the experts would know if you were sick (no symptom’s notwithstanding) so you didn’t kill grandma. They hooked us with emotion (saving Grandma out of an abundance of caution) and validated with logic based on lies and false evidence.
The tragic irony is this shit is still being pumped into our infants in spite of overwhelming vaccine injuries, miscarriages, and spike being produced 2 years after injection still debilitating the body. and the Biden administration with two months left renewed the pandemic for another couple years under EUA and Prep Act immunity.
Yes, completely tragic. Disgusting how the Biden administration plunged the knife in the peoples back one last time before leaving. I'm pretty sure these death jabs are still on the children's vaccine schedule here in Canada. We have the same enemy.
And yes, they "hooked us" alright. I think you might enjoy this 5 min video on the Theory of Stupidity. A Lutheran Pastor, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, figured this out during WWII: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww47bR86wSc
Still blows my mind when I watch that video again, and see the perfect parallels to "Operation Covid-19".
HI Vivien. No, not those kits. This would be for the tests sent by the doctor/hospital. I'm sure the kits you're talking about were probably rigged as well. I never took any PCR test (or any of the 'Genetic Molestation Shots'), but I did have a friend who showed me one of those rapid test kits, which to me looked like a minuature TLC (thin layer chromatography) plate. If so, then it's even less specific than a true PCR analysis (if cycles kept 20-25max). You could probably put pineapple juice on those kits and get a postive result. In a laboratory environment, TLC plates are often used AFTER a few steps are done to filter out impurities/competing compounds. Going straight to a TLC plate for diagnosis in this situation is pretty useless IMHO (I used to work with TLC/HPLC,Gas chromatograpy.. etc in a lab).
Thank you Mark, coincidentally my son just texted me and said he and his wife have covid, tested through one of those home kits. His wife and her parents think I’m off my rocker with all things covid. ( I’m injured). I told them that the home kits could show false positives. Their annoyance factor went up when I said that. We were supposed to have lunch this coming Thursday with my daughter in law’s parents and another couple. My daughter in laws mother texted me saying she’s not worried about catching covid from them because she’s had 6 shots. I’ve learned to keep my mouth shut.
Oh my. Yes, in these situations staying quiet is probably the best thing. I have similar issues on my end. Best friend of mine, and much of his family, have excommunicated me from their life's for my calling out the BS. My friend told me his mom (I've know for 40yrs) never wants to speak to me again. Oddly I wasn't that disturbed by what she said, as I understood her good will was highjacked. But, still irks me to this day. This whole operation put many of us through an existential crisis. If I didn't have faith in God, I'd probably be a wreck. Stay strong, calm and carry on.!
What I find ludicrous is I’ve spent 3 plus years following esteemed doctors, scientists and statisticians. These people who are so critical of us haven’t spent 3 seconds on any kind of research but we’re the idiots. Grrr.
You can check on your local health authorities website current occurrence of cv19 RNA in wastewater followup. Here in Finland it has dropped practically to zero. If that the case in your area, the probability of false positive test is high, especially if the symptoms dont match well.
Have the Chinese succeeded? Missing 400 millions and then another 100 million? On before 20 babies now only one? Is this due only to their one child system before or possibly an unwanted result of the jab? But I seem to remember their jabs were different and not so poisonous as ours, or am I wrong? Some other factor? Anybody knows in this important matter because that changes the whole world outlook, does it not?
The one-child system is long gone; it has been a three-child system for some time now. The Chinese seem to think they will need more people for the future - make of it what you will.
So, The King and the Emperor walked into a debate and... Oh, sorry. This is a serious discussion (but I couldn't help myself; my apologies and just ignore me., while I read the stack).
One other point I’d like to make, from a layman’s point of view. The virus landed on our shores March 2020. By November 2020 they were putting shots in arms. How in the world did they accomplish that, including clinical trials in such a short period of time? New technology, but little attention given to possible side effects, with no active, independent data collection looking at signals which blows my mind. Also, if they could accomplish the shot in such a short time then it’s not a stretch to believe they have the wherewithal to have come up with a diagnostic test for vaccine injuries and deaths. I believe they don’t want a diagnostic test because they don’t want the truth to surface, which allows them to still promote the propaganda “safe and effective “ and “injuries are rare.”
Remember that "the virus" was circulating as usual in the fall of 2019. I had my first episode at the end of November and my wife had hers at the end of Jan., 2020.
Thank you Kevin for continuing to push the truth, it’s so frustrating going up against constant corruption. What you write is way over my head by I believe in your expertise and integrity.
As far as I know there is no statute of limitations for crimes against humanity, and it would be entirely reasonable for those that are complicit in supporting a continuation of the murderous crimes to face the same fatal consequences as the soulless sociopaths that initiated them.
It is entirely apparent that the creatures so willing to be party to genocidal, have the advantage of unrestrained actions well outside the bounds of generally accepted rules of civil society. Those that recognise that with those rules routinely broken, there is an urgency to also act to independently by stepping outside those social confines and implementing the independent Vigilante reset in order to re-establish the rule of law outside the blatantly corrupted system.
It may be that individuals see a God given opportunity to act independently and save multiple lives by permanently removing a cog or cogs in the wheel of tyranny. Better perhaps would be small groups of common law warriors around an appointed Sheriff and a jury of 12 good citizens acting in the best interests of lawful communities inclusive of trial by jury and the execution of the verdict for the benefit of ending the murderous corruption and the ongoing genocidal agenda.
I would suggest that such executioners of this lawful departure from the current genocidal legal fiction, would best come predominantly from those of us Baby Boomer's that feel a sense of responsibility for allowing our society to be so profoundly corrupted by the very lowest form of life on the planet.
"A breakthrough in safely delivering therapeutic DNA to cells could transform treatment for millions suffering from common chronic diseases like heart disease, diabetes, and cancer."
"The new approach builds directly on the genetic medicine revolution that began at Penn: the development of safe messenger RNA (mRNA) therapies used in COVID vaccines.
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania improved the process of turning on the DNA's instructions in mice to make proteins inside cells and published at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02556-5 in Nature Biotechnology.
Breaking Science Smackdown! 🥊 König vs. Kaiser – The Ultimate Showdown Over DNA Contamination!
🎤 Welcome to the Main Event! 🎤
In one corner, we have König et al., wielding their fluorometric-based assays and claiming sky-high DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines! In the other, Kaiser et al., armed with ethanol precipitation and a grant from the establishment, insisting “Nothing to See Here!”
🔥 The Feud So Far: 🔥
König’s team dropped a bombshell, reporting DNA contamination up to 534 times the regulatory limit. They warned that small DNA fragments, once inside lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), could be transfected into cells. Kaiser’s squad fired back, claiming the method overestimated DNA due to interference from RNA and lipids. But König wasn’t having it—pointing out that ethanol precipitation fails to capture small DNA fragments, making Kaiser’s numbers meaningless!
👀 Skeptical VIP Section – Watching from the Balcony: 👀
Critics argue that this entire debate is built on shaky ground, because what’s called ‘DNA’ and ‘RNA’ are the product of chemical, acidic, and heat abuse on biological substances. Where’s the direct biochemical proof that these molecules code for proteins? Has anyone truly isolated and purified them according to the scientific method, without contamination or assumptions?
🧪 Methods Under the Microscope! 🧪
• Fluorometric-based assays: König’s method, but is it really quantifying ‘DNA,’ or just lighting up molecular debris?
• Ethanol precipitation: Kaiser’s go-to-trick, great for missing small DNA fragments, since DNA itself is just a chemically tortured precipitate of biological mush.
• PCR amplification: Built on assumptions of what is being detected—where’s the independent biochemical validation?
• Phenol-chloroform extraction: Used for decades, but what if it’s just refining artifacts rather than isolating a genuine genetic entity?
🤔 What’s Next? 🤔
💥 Will König deliver the knockout punch with a new detection method that bypasses the need to work with ‘pure’ real ‘DNA’ – again??
💥 Will Kaiser perfect the “Nothing to See Here Shuffle” with yet another paper declaring all is well?
💥 Will regulators finally admit that the so-called mRNA technology isn’t a proven biological tool—it’s a synthetic injection cooked up in the lab, propped up by an unverified paradigm? A house of cards, really—except the cards are made of a non-existent virus, an unproven mechanism, and a molecular ‘DNA’/‘RNA’ myth masquerading as cutting-edge science. The only real thing? The toxicity it leaves in its wake?
Great write-up again! Unbelievable these morons talk all the talk but where can we SEE their labs, their findings and why don't they do us all a favor and live broadcast their experiments in 4k with the ability to panorama equipped with micro zoom capabilities? Kevin, you've DONE the work and the so-called "scientists" deposing and discrediting can only be worth listening to if we have it broadcasted live with credible observers from opposing sides including neutral observers. We must literally watch them acquire crucial tools used in their labs, watch them interpret and observers must conclude or make remarks during critical steps. Yes, we must see no cross contamination while third parties conclude along with chain of custody...all that. You've set the record straight and I will always advocate your approach as long as you continue to be as purely objective as you've consistently been. Just saying this is the biggest issue and it's not getting headlined over greed and power!
Dr. Arakawa Hiroshi of Milan's Institute of Molecular Biology also said that quantitative short DNA, which is a contaminant, cannot be quantified using the qPCR method.
It explains that "Fluorometer + Oxford NanoPore Reagent" is essential.
In the first place, it is a conflict of interest that has been supported by the German Vaccine Research Promotion Association.
They KNOW this could kill the mod-mRNA Covid "vaccines". But actually, they are less concerned about that and more concerned about the future of the mRNA platform - which is the real reason they are fighting tooth and nail to concede nothing and stay with the "safe and effective" mantra.
Once the manufacturing technology is in place, nRNA products cost almost nothing to produce (especially if the purification phase is, let's say, "minimized". The "raw material is E.Coli bacteria.
So in applying this technology to future "Vaccine" "Upgrades", gene therapies and others, there are BIllions of profits at stake.
That's the real reason they are refusing to give ground, as well as still covering-up the involvement of the Military and Global Governments in the Covid psyop.
I agree, it’s about the wealthy investments in the mRNA technology. Also, maybe they steal technology promoted by others to perfect their product. I thought it curious that in 2021 the NIH flew 21 or 22 vaccine injured people to their building and conducted many tests including taking spinal fluid. This was all under the guise of helping the injured but the research came to an abrupt halt with no explanation. The participants mentioned that the samples were frozen. Was this all an endeavour to tweak the product to make it safer?
Indeed these creatures have been effectively committing such limited genocidal acts as the Covid19 Coup D'état for multiple generations. It is the establishment of mRNA platform itself that was always the primary goal, that goes well beyond mere genocide of a few hundren million plebs.
This is likely not simply an End Game event but more accurately an End Time event similar of to that of the murky history of the end of the world empire of Atlantis, and cyclic "natural" disasters indicative of Earth currently loosing the protection of it's Electromagnetic field.
This appears to be the final decade of of preparation by the Khazarian parasitic infestation of the human genome, cementing their position of dominants over (more) natural human beings, and their intended inheritance of the Earth at the expense of wholesome human civilisation.
“They have to invent new methods to detect and eliminate these nucleic acids once LNPs are involved. Same holds true for your immune system but they don’t want talk about that elephant in the room.”
This👆 that’s why we don’t have compendial standards yet and need an orthogonal method or two for just about every attribute. If you don’t know how to reliably measure, what to measure or if the measurement reflects reality, then why are we using this platform?
The “fraud” unraveled:
1) RNase and modRNA
Problem: Comirnaty and Spikevax use 100 % N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) instead of uridine - this makes modRNA more stable against RNases. They say “RNase removes RNA” - but studies show that m1Ψ strongly inhibits hydrolysis by RNase A (which they presumably use).
Proof:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11302211/
Consequence: if RNase fails (or is only partially effective), modRNA remains in the sample - Qubit then measures RNA residues as DNA (overestimation) or overlooks ssDNA (underestimation). Their “100-fold reduction” is questionable - perhaps they only degraded a fraction of RNA.
2) Qubit weakness in hybrids/ssDNA:
Problem: Even with RNase, DNA-RNA hybrids (e.g. from production) or ssDNA (fragmented plasmid residues) could remain. Qubit HS DNA Assay is optimized for dsDNA - only 20-50 % of ssDNA is detected.
Evidence: Your spike-in tests (lambda DNA) show saturation - with modRNA (30-100 µg) plus DNA the signal could be chaotic. RNase-resistant modRNA amplifies this.
Consequence: 0-12.6 ng DNA sounds clean, but if ssDNA or hybrids are present, it's unreliable - they ignore it.
3) Phenol-chloroform as a “cure”:
Problem: They say lipids (e.g. ALC-0315) interfere with RNase or Qubit - phenol-chloroform is supposed to solve it. But:
Phenol-chloroform is not 100 % quantitative with LNPs - lipophilic residues (secondary amines from degradation) could interact with nucleic acids.
Ethanol precipitation loses small fragments (<50 bp) generated during DNase-treated production.
Consequence: your “clean” 35-55 ng might underestimate - real DNA (ssDNA, fragments) is lost or masked.
4) LC-MS as confirmation?
Problem: LC-MS shows 1000x more RNA than DNA - but they hydrolyzed with nuclease P1 and phosphodiesterase, which also degrade m1Ψ-RNA only slowly . If modRNA remains intact, DNA is underestimated.
Consequence: LC-MS and Qubit agree because both have the same weakness - they see modRNA dominance but not the true amount of DNA.
Data fudge:
Problem: 10 µg vs. 20 µg RNase changes DNA levels (12.6 ng vs. lower) - they admit this but wipe it away. This screams inconsistency - how much RNA really remains?
Consequence: their “purification” is arbitrary - no standardization, no guarantee that modRNA is gone.
Wow! I even got some of the points Kevin mentioned.
You wrote "If modRNA remains intact, DNA is underestimated."
Why is DNA underestimated?
If modRNA remains intact, nucleosides from RNA are decreased, the ratio of RNA to DNA is underestimated, and then the apparent DNA value will be increased.
If modRNA remains intact, it can still bind fluorescence dyes like those in the Qubit assay, which are supposed to detect DNA. This creates a false signal, inflating the apparent DNA value. But because Kaiser et al. assume all RNA is gone and measure only 'DNA,' any intact modRNA masks the true DNA amount, leading to an underestimation of actual DNA contamination. Your point about nucleosides and ratios applies to LC-MS, where intact modRNA reduces RNA nucleoside detection, skewing the RNA:DNA ratio—but for Qubit, it’s about fluorescence binding, not nucleosides.
That's the joke hard to get how they mess up and sell you bullshit as science.
And now think it to the end: So if you have small fragments 10 - 75 BP they won't bind cause cloaked due to modRNA. So in the end you underestimate the amount.
And even better: if plasmid (supercoiled) you will also have a problem.
Does any intact modRNA mask the true DNA amount by Qubit?
I think modRNA can inflate the DNA measurement value, leading to an over-estimation of actual DNA contamination.
Trying last time to explain that you ignore reality.
Look, the real issue is size and binding: DNA fragments (10-75 bp) are tiny compared to a half or whole modRNA strand (hundreds to thousands of bases). If modRNA hangs around—thanks to m1Ψ resisting RNase—it can bind to these small DNA fragments, especially ssDNA, through partial hybridization or electrostatic messiness. That slashes their availability to bind Qubit’s fluorescence dye, which already sucks at detecting ssDNA (20-50% efficiency). So, while intact modRNA lights up the assay and inflates the raw ‘DNA’ signal, the real DNA fragments—potentially way more numerous—get cloaked by modRNA and go underdetected. Kaiser et al. call it all ‘DNA,’ but they’re blind to what’s actually there. Quantification? Forget it—the numbers don’t add up because you can’t tease apart what’s bound versus free. And then Qubit’s saturation kicks in: at high nucleic acid loads (30-100 µg modRNA), the dye hits a ceiling, flattening the signal and masking any nuance between modRNA and DNA fragments. It’s a double whammy—overestimation of junk, underestimation of the real stuff. Their method’s a joke.
Qubit’s optimized for dsDNA, sure, but who knows what’s in these LNPs—ssDNA, dsDNA, tiny fragments, or coiled plasmids? It’s a mess. Qubit ignores ssDNA half the time (20-50% efficiency) yet still binds modRNA, pumping up the signal with junk while missing the real DNA. You’re stuck with a test that’s both blind and sloppy. Switching to qPCR and ddPCR makes way more sense—they’re sequence-specific, amplify what’s actually there, and don’t care about modRNA fluorescence nonsense. ddPCR especially, with its absolute quantification, could nail the DNA copy number, no saturation bullshit. Kaiser et al. should’ve ditched Qubit for that combo—it’s closer to reality than their glow-in-the-dark guessing game.
What do you mean by 'the real DNA fragments'? Are most of the DNA fragments ssDNA or DNA/RNA hybrids?
In the first place, N (this time, 1) methyl pseudo-uridine has never been used by living organisms in the 3.6 billion years of biological history.
Therefore, I don't think any living things on Earth have a system that can adapt to this.
The discoveries of Kaliko et al. are useless discoveries for living things. It is a very shallow idea to use this for people.
When the difficult-degradable pseudo-mRNA is present in the cell, Ribosome causes mistranslation of the t-RNA.
This is certainly true that this will create unknown proteins and lead to a variety of autoimmune diseases.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3
Pitfalls in RNA Modification Quantification Using Nucleoside Mass Spectrometry
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00402
You will narf your ass off: 1:1 what I've said. Most funniest funfact. They quoted a paper by Kaiser et al.
You see the authors of that Kaiser paper and what University they're all out of? Ya, big F*($*ing surprise there, lol. Same University that Prof. Dr Christian Drosten came out of. Remember Drosten? That's the POS who woefully manipulated the PCR test to scream positive: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7095456/ . They used the PCR test, and false death counting, to create the illusion of a pandemic. As far as proving guilt for the crimes against humanity, the manipulation of the PCR test is a slam dunk all by itself. Nevermind the fact it's not supposed to be used for diagnoses (alone), the fact it was massively overcycled screams a 'nefarious plot' was at play. During the beginning of "Operation Covid-19", the Deputy Cheif Microbioligist of Public Health Ontario (Canada) was quoted: "...any indication of the virus in a sample is important, regardless of how many cycles it took to find." (https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/About/News/2021/Explained-COVID19-PCR-Testing-and-Cycle-Thresholds). In Ontario they were cycling it up to 42 times!!! For a real laugh you can go on youtube and watch an instructional video about chosing the right cycle count for the PCR test. Notice were 42 cycles is on the chart?....ya, it's not there because it's off scale : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_xsuRQIM9M
After 30 cycles the PCR test is garbage, as overcycling causes the test to be non specific.....let it glow, let it glow, let it glow.
And over-cycling the PCR allowed them to prove asymptomatic spread and infection which accelerated public panic and obeisance because only the experts would know if you were sick (no symptom’s notwithstanding) so you didn’t kill grandma. They hooked us with emotion (saving Grandma out of an abundance of caution) and validated with logic based on lies and false evidence.
The tragic irony is this shit is still being pumped into our infants in spite of overwhelming vaccine injuries, miscarriages, and spike being produced 2 years after injection still debilitating the body. and the Biden administration with two months left renewed the pandemic for another couple years under EUA and Prep Act immunity.
Murder Inc. is alive and well 5 years later.
Yes, completely tragic. Disgusting how the Biden administration plunged the knife in the peoples back one last time before leaving. I'm pretty sure these death jabs are still on the children's vaccine schedule here in Canada. We have the same enemy.
And yes, they "hooked us" alright. I think you might enjoy this 5 min video on the Theory of Stupidity. A Lutheran Pastor, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, figured this out during WWII: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww47bR86wSc
Still blows my mind when I watch that video again, and see the perfect parallels to "Operation Covid-19".
This s why the globalists put Niden in power
You are s right
Mark are you referring to the home kits we got or when we lined up at hospitals for testing? Which of course they ended because of the cost.
HI Vivien. No, not those kits. This would be for the tests sent by the doctor/hospital. I'm sure the kits you're talking about were probably rigged as well. I never took any PCR test (or any of the 'Genetic Molestation Shots'), but I did have a friend who showed me one of those rapid test kits, which to me looked like a minuature TLC (thin layer chromatography) plate. If so, then it's even less specific than a true PCR analysis (if cycles kept 20-25max). You could probably put pineapple juice on those kits and get a postive result. In a laboratory environment, TLC plates are often used AFTER a few steps are done to filter out impurities/competing compounds. Going straight to a TLC plate for diagnosis in this situation is pretty useless IMHO (I used to work with TLC/HPLC,Gas chromatograpy.. etc in a lab).
Thank you Mark, coincidentally my son just texted me and said he and his wife have covid, tested through one of those home kits. His wife and her parents think I’m off my rocker with all things covid. ( I’m injured). I told them that the home kits could show false positives. Their annoyance factor went up when I said that. We were supposed to have lunch this coming Thursday with my daughter in law’s parents and another couple. My daughter in laws mother texted me saying she’s not worried about catching covid from them because she’s had 6 shots. I’ve learned to keep my mouth shut.
Oh my. Yes, in these situations staying quiet is probably the best thing. I have similar issues on my end. Best friend of mine, and much of his family, have excommunicated me from their life's for my calling out the BS. My friend told me his mom (I've know for 40yrs) never wants to speak to me again. Oddly I wasn't that disturbed by what she said, as I understood her good will was highjacked. But, still irks me to this day. This whole operation put many of us through an existential crisis. If I didn't have faith in God, I'd probably be a wreck. Stay strong, calm and carry on.!
What I find ludicrous is I’ve spent 3 plus years following esteemed doctors, scientists and statisticians. These people who are so critical of us haven’t spent 3 seconds on any kind of research but we’re the idiots. Grrr.
You can check on your local health authorities website current occurrence of cv19 RNA in wastewater followup. Here in Finland it has dropped practically to zero. If that the case in your area, the probability of false positive test is high, especially if the symptoms dont match well.
It’s about money and control and depopulation…. NOT real science.
Have the Chinese succeeded? Missing 400 millions and then another 100 million? On before 20 babies now only one? Is this due only to their one child system before or possibly an unwanted result of the jab? But I seem to remember their jabs were different and not so poisonous as ours, or am I wrong? Some other factor? Anybody knows in this important matter because that changes the whole world outlook, does it not?
The one-child system is long gone; it has been a three-child system for some time now. The Chinese seem to think they will need more people for the future - make of it what you will.
So, The King and the Emperor walked into a debate and... Oh, sorry. This is a serious discussion (but I couldn't help myself; my apologies and just ignore me., while I read the stack).
... well, if you have to hide the greatest crime against humanity in orders of magnitude ever.
If there are other authors……wtf.
Sorry--but it's all Greek to me
One other point I’d like to make, from a layman’s point of view. The virus landed on our shores March 2020. By November 2020 they were putting shots in arms. How in the world did they accomplish that, including clinical trials in such a short period of time? New technology, but little attention given to possible side effects, with no active, independent data collection looking at signals which blows my mind. Also, if they could accomplish the shot in such a short time then it’s not a stretch to believe they have the wherewithal to have come up with a diagnostic test for vaccine injuries and deaths. I believe they don’t want a diagnostic test because they don’t want the truth to surface, which allows them to still promote the propaganda “safe and effective “ and “injuries are rare.”
Remember that "the virus" was circulating as usual in the fall of 2019. I had my first episode at the end of November and my wife had hers at the end of Jan., 2020.
No panic until the plandemic.
Oh really. That’s very interesting.
Thank you Kevin for continuing to push the truth, it’s so frustrating going up against constant corruption. What you write is way over my head by I believe in your expertise and integrity.
Great work and thanks for updating us often.
Do you know if there is any progress being made to address the health issues caused by the presence of these findings?
As far as I know there is no statute of limitations for crimes against humanity, and it would be entirely reasonable for those that are complicit in supporting a continuation of the murderous crimes to face the same fatal consequences as the soulless sociopaths that initiated them.
It is entirely apparent that the creatures so willing to be party to genocidal, have the advantage of unrestrained actions well outside the bounds of generally accepted rules of civil society. Those that recognise that with those rules routinely broken, there is an urgency to also act to independently by stepping outside those social confines and implementing the independent Vigilante reset in order to re-establish the rule of law outside the blatantly corrupted system.
It may be that individuals see a God given opportunity to act independently and save multiple lives by permanently removing a cog or cogs in the wheel of tyranny. Better perhaps would be small groups of common law warriors around an appointed Sheriff and a jury of 12 good citizens acting in the best interests of lawful communities inclusive of trial by jury and the execution of the verdict for the benefit of ending the murderous corruption and the ongoing genocidal agenda.
I would suggest that such executioners of this lawful departure from the current genocidal legal fiction, would best come predominantly from those of us Baby Boomer's that feel a sense of responsibility for allowing our society to be so profoundly corrupted by the very lowest form of life on the planet.
https://phys.org/news/2025-03-dna-lipid-nanoparticles-poised-gene.html reports:
"A breakthrough in safely delivering therapeutic DNA to cells could transform treatment for millions suffering from common chronic diseases like heart disease, diabetes, and cancer."
"The new approach builds directly on the genetic medicine revolution that began at Penn: the development of safe messenger RNA (mRNA) therapies used in COVID vaccines.
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania improved the process of turning on the DNA's instructions in mice to make proteins inside cells and published at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-025-02556-5 in Nature Biotechnology.
Breaking Science Smackdown! 🥊 König vs. Kaiser – The Ultimate Showdown Over DNA Contamination!
🎤 Welcome to the Main Event! 🎤
In one corner, we have König et al., wielding their fluorometric-based assays and claiming sky-high DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines! In the other, Kaiser et al., armed with ethanol precipitation and a grant from the establishment, insisting “Nothing to See Here!”
🔥 The Feud So Far: 🔥
König’s team dropped a bombshell, reporting DNA contamination up to 534 times the regulatory limit. They warned that small DNA fragments, once inside lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), could be transfected into cells. Kaiser’s squad fired back, claiming the method overestimated DNA due to interference from RNA and lipids. But König wasn’t having it—pointing out that ethanol precipitation fails to capture small DNA fragments, making Kaiser’s numbers meaningless!
👀 Skeptical VIP Section – Watching from the Balcony: 👀
Critics argue that this entire debate is built on shaky ground, because what’s called ‘DNA’ and ‘RNA’ are the product of chemical, acidic, and heat abuse on biological substances. Where’s the direct biochemical proof that these molecules code for proteins? Has anyone truly isolated and purified them according to the scientific method, without contamination or assumptions?
🧪 Methods Under the Microscope! 🧪
• Fluorometric-based assays: König’s method, but is it really quantifying ‘DNA,’ or just lighting up molecular debris?
• Ethanol precipitation: Kaiser’s go-to-trick, great for missing small DNA fragments, since DNA itself is just a chemically tortured precipitate of biological mush.
• PCR amplification: Built on assumptions of what is being detected—where’s the independent biochemical validation?
• Phenol-chloroform extraction: Used for decades, but what if it’s just refining artifacts rather than isolating a genuine genetic entity?
🤔 What’s Next? 🤔
💥 Will König deliver the knockout punch with a new detection method that bypasses the need to work with ‘pure’ real ‘DNA’ – again??
💥 Will Kaiser perfect the “Nothing to See Here Shuffle” with yet another paper declaring all is well?
💥 Will regulators finally admit that the so-called mRNA technology isn’t a proven biological tool—it’s a synthetic injection cooked up in the lab, propped up by an unverified paradigm? A house of cards, really—except the cards are made of a non-existent virus, an unproven mechanism, and a molecular ‘DNA’/‘RNA’ myth masquerading as cutting-edge science. The only real thing? The toxicity it leaves in its wake?
Stay tuned, folks! The saga continues… 🎭
Great write-up again! Unbelievable these morons talk all the talk but where can we SEE their labs, their findings and why don't they do us all a favor and live broadcast their experiments in 4k with the ability to panorama equipped with micro zoom capabilities? Kevin, you've DONE the work and the so-called "scientists" deposing and discrediting can only be worth listening to if we have it broadcasted live with credible observers from opposing sides including neutral observers. We must literally watch them acquire crucial tools used in their labs, watch them interpret and observers must conclude or make remarks during critical steps. Yes, we must see no cross contamination while third parties conclude along with chain of custody...all that. You've set the record straight and I will always advocate your approach as long as you continue to be as purely objective as you've consistently been. Just saying this is the biggest issue and it's not getting headlined over greed and power!
Dr. Arakawa Hiroshi of Milan's Institute of Molecular Biology also said that quantitative short DNA, which is a contaminant, cannot be quantified using the qPCR method.
It explains that "Fluorometer + Oxford NanoPore Reagent" is essential.
In the first place, it is a conflict of interest that has been supported by the German Vaccine Research Promotion Association.