Dr. McKernan, this Mordechay et al. (2025) paper is the human biodistribution smoking gun you’ve been waiting for. Your sequencing work forced the world to admit the vials contain residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter – contaminants regulators swore didn’t exist. Now we have the downstream reality in living people:
1> Pfizer mRNA sequences still detectable in ~50% of samples more than 200 days post-injection,
2> Sperm cells positive at 168 days despite the blood-testis barrier and rapid turnover,
3> 3 of 6 unvaccinated pregnant women positive in blood and/or placenta while pre-2020 controls remain negative.
All of this only visible because they used nested PCR. Standard qPCR – the method used in every official “no persistence” study – would have missed it entirely.
The authors note the source of the unvaccinated positives is “yet to be investigated,” but when pre-2020 controls are clean and three never-jabbed women light up, shedding is the glaringly obvious explanation.
The fact that this degree of persistence and reproductive-tissue tropism exists at all – after Pfizer and regulators swore the platform cleared in hours and “stays at the injection site” – demolishes the foundational safety narrative they sold to billions.
Your plasmid findings + their months-long mRNA persistence in placenta and germline = the complete picture no regulator ever wanted published.
They rolled this out with only 14-day rodent data and no long-term human reproductive monitoring. Whatever else this study does or doesn’t prove, it proves the “transient, local, safe” story was fraudulent from day one.
Thank you for refusing to let them bury the sequencing data. This paper lands ten times harder because of everything you’ve already forced into the open. The receipts keep stacking.
If you look at the Pfizer paper from 2020 and what it says about being exposed - Initially I thought this meant that the participants had been directly in contact with the vials or "vaccine".
Now I realise that being exposed by "inhalation or skin contact" could mean that you have been physically close to someone who has taken the vaccine.
Starting on p 67 of the protocol the investigator is instructed to report various "environmental exposures".
These included
1)"A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
2) "A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
3) "A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
4) "A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
Israel used Pfizer only, so the long-term mRNA signal they’re now picking up can’t be brushed off as “vaccine mixing” or some weird Moderna artifact. Moderna actually admitted in their patents that their LNPs were generating lipid–RNA adduct garbage and they tried to clean it up. Pfizer? Nothing. No fixes, no patents, no acknowledgement and they just kept running the same ALC-0315 chemistry that’s notorious for making lots of sticky, nuclease-proof lipid–RNA covalent complexes. I think those fragments are likely still in the vials even in 2024, and and that might explain why they’re still showing up in blood, placenta, and semen months later. I think these adducts are very hard to degrade and could last for months, or more. These lipid-adduct mRNA fragments are non-translatable but they could stall ribosomes and are inflammatory.
yes, I do. Or if a lipid adduct binds to spike protein in the cell say, forming a hapten, Could be a nidus to start these clots. One thing to keep in mind, is that many studies looking at spike protein forming clots, use recombinant wuhan spike protein. Not all report the endotoxin levels which could be problem. Could be the endotoxin in these studies, maybe.
Those who stand behind continuation of the administering of these jabs must be truly disturbed, mentally, to the point it can be opined of their being sociopathic, how else to describe such truly vile and pernicious, harmful behaviour, I mean good lord, what on earth are they thinking continuing to both advocate and defend the benefits of said drugs… run them out.. of science, name, shame every single one involved, who so behaves and equivocate… these people so engaged have forfeited their rights to being included in society of any descriptive… they’ve made their choice, their bed, the hill they choose to die upon, now proven wrong, we need to ram that result home… including the political class, whether they be elected or unelected political elites, out them all, shame them, their involvement as they can never ever be allowed to sweep or mitigate their actual involvement in what is tantamount to a massive grift… aided and abetted corrupt and fraudulent behaviour by those just saying
Today UNC Health emailed me and my 2 kids to remind us to get our flu and Covid shots. Great timing. One is 17, the other 24. I have no idea what it will take to stop them.
John, that would then involve getting rid of all those who have developed and pushed Dr. Mengelefauci's Ouchies and other quackcines! WHO in BIG HARMA A.K.A. NOTHEALTHCARE! and with POTUS Donald J. Trump (who I will always call "The King of COVID-19") JUST WHO is going to do THAT? 😲
You have to start somewhere to do what is right for the population! R U on board with keeping these for the sake of money or to rid of them for humanity!
John, I am NOT on board with ANY of them. . .but I have no control over ANY of them! The only REAL thing I and YOU can do is SURVIVE their evil plots . . .and warn others to NOT be deceived by them! 😲
There is no perfect solution for shedding. However most homes/multi-apartments and businesses in USA use RECYCLING AIR HVAC in their facilities, which means people inhale the same air that all inhabitants exhale. The alternative is similar to the pre-air-conditioning days: open windows, air goes straight-line from outside thru inside and out a window on the other side. Non-recycling (with heat and cooling recovery units) HVAC can do that too, draw it in, let people breath while the air is drafted over people's heads, then draft it back outside. Wrap Heat (and cooling) recovery ventilation piping units over outgoing exhaust pipes to pre-warm or pre-cool incoming air to save on utility costs. Outside air is disinfected by sun's ultraviolet waves, even on cloudy days, and may still be "cleansed air" after dark. What becomes a painful personal decision is whether to remain partnered with spouses or friends insofar as one is Covid-inoculated, and the other is not. That is my situation, though it took me almost two years to determine that my spouse of 50 years took 3 shots. It made no sense to me, with two years of receiving her shedding to leave her, so we remain married and make the best of it. And, I am sharing and buying her nutrients that aid health, strength, vigor and maybe a longer life for us old farts (73/75).
radar, so SAD for both of you with those Dr. Mengelefauci's Ouchies! Why did she take three? Taking natural healers greatly helps! My boyfriend did not after taking two Moderna in early '21 before I knew him. He died in 10 ~ 24 with multiple problems. I still have a blood clot that began during that time. I hope that you both survive!
Jayna, my wife is now 75; and was about 70 when she took the first course of two shots, then later the booster. She is a "sucker" for (regarding) loyalty. The message she got from Biden ads, etc. (though Biden's message came later, but all other messages were: Get the shot, save your loved ones. She was loyal to the messaging, and did it. Why she took a fourth Pfizer and later/last a Moderna, I have no idea. And the subject is still taboo between us (in fact I haven't told her that I know yet). My wife has changed a bit in the last few years. Her messaging is abbreviated, and I cannot tell whether when she leaves out "a sentence's Object of focus" if she thinks because of a context that I should understand, or whether she may be coming down with a dementia". I monitor it and tell myself, this is early onset Alzh's. He father died with Alzheimers, though as a young to mid-aged farmer he did get kicked unconscious in the head by a dairy cow, when milking her. The family said, he was never the same after that; though he thought he was fine. My wife had Rheumatoid Arthritis at age 11; in a hospital ward for 3 months taking 54 aspirin a day to keep her fever down, and then at home in bed for 7 months; and the RH etc. persisted all her life (except a couple of years in FL--I thought the sandy soil must have not held some mold/mildew that was in soil everywhere else we lived). Osteoarthrits began about 20 years ago. Daily pain all the time. That may have been a factor in taking the shots.
Believe me, I have been trying and for some have succeeded! Others I am still working on! I only hope they, anyone and everyone, will eventually wake up! But still have to get this shit off the market! Let alone just stop taking them! I have not had ANY vaccines since elementary and I am now 62! I was not scared of the latest plandemic either!
I realize that this paper is not your research. I appreciate your response. I'm very conversant in molecular genetic techniques. I didn't realize the difference was 70%. I thought it was only the presence of the Proline-Proline pair in PP-Spike.
I'm just trying to hypothesize how an unvaccinated woman would have vaccine mRNA sequences in her blood, unless I'm misinterpreting the table. The authors themselves are confused by the origin of this mRNA and say so in their Discussion. Nick Huelshur (McCullough Foundation) posted on X that this was evidence of vaccine shedding, something I have never believed occurred except from mother to fetus or in breast milk. I'm just searching for an explanation that makes sense.
If you look at the Pfizer paper from 2020 and what it says about being exposed - Initially I thought this meant that the participants had been directly in contact with the vials or "vaccine".
Now I realise that being exposed by "inhalation or skin contact" could mean that you have been physically close to someone who has taken the vaccine.
Starting on p 67 of the protocol the investigator is instructed to report various "environmental exposures".
These included
1)"A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
2) "A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
3) "A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
4) "A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
I am a retired molecular geneticist, cell biologist, biochemist. There is NO mechanism that I can conceive of that would explain shedding of the mRNA-LNP vaccines. The term shedding comes from vaccines that contained attenuated live viruses. Depending on how the attenuation is done, a few of the viruses become able to reproduce in the host and the host then releases these active viruses into feces and other wastes.
How could any vaccinated individual produce modified mRNA encapsulated into a lipid nanoparticle? Without the lipid encapsulation, the mRNA cannot enter a new host's cells. Humans do not produce modified RNA even it their cells contain and were capable of reproducing mRNA. Our skin has RNAse enzymes that would destroy any mRNA that touches it. Our blood destroys unmodified mRNA that is not encapsulated in an LNP. Endosomes move between and within tissues.
The papers that have been written on the topic of shedding propose POTENTIAL mechanisms of shedding. NONE have been demonstrated to occur. The data in this paper would be the first, if it is true and reproducible. If you notice, none of the unvaccinated people in the general population had mRNA in their blood. Are they suggesting that there is something special about being or getting pregnant? Not all of the unvaccinated women had mRNA in their blood. The authors themselves cannot explain this. It makes no sense to me.
I read the Pfizer protocol in detail. I think this comment is a red herring. The FDA gave them a list of Serious Adverse Events to watch out for. Shedding is a vaccine concern for SOME vaccines. So Pfizer threw this in.
Interesting article. Most of the study was done in vitro with cultured cells. The experiments that were in vivo in mice showed distribution of EVs within the individual mouse organ systems. I do not see how this could explain transmission from one individual to another. If you go back to the article, they say they detect vaccine mRNA in unvaccinated women. People are claiming that the mRNA is getting transferred to these women from their vaccinated male partners, presumably via sperm. To me, this is a real stretch of the imagination.
Thank you for this interesting comment. I quite understand your points.
However I cannot see why Pfizer should warn against "vaccine shedding" if it is an impossibility for this product. It is much more likely that they know there is a risk. This would also align with numerous anecdotal reports of people who were convinced that they had suffered ill-health from contact with vaccinated persons.
Rather than work from prior assumptions and facts taken on trust that we have been told about how these products work, it seems we need to look at everything again without any preconceptions.
Like you, I thought shedding was not worth considering as a risk, until recently when evidence appears to suggest that unvaccinated persons are showing signs of transmission.
However we have hitherto assumed that we have been honestly informed about the contents of these injections.
I seriously doubt that ANYTHING we have been told on the science of these products can be trusted. There are increasing suspicions that off-target molecules and complexes could be formed.
Maria Gutschi has written some interesting articles on this.
Have you followed the findings on the amyloid micro-clotting?
Amyloid fibrils are found in the vaccinated but also in unvaccinated people. The unvaccinated people with microclotting can suffer from "long covid" but there are also cases where the person feels quite well, but on investigation, the microclotting is found in a blood sample.
The assumption is that these people have been infected at some point with Sars-Cov-2. and this accounts for these findings. However this is just an assumption and we cannot be certain how, or in what form, these substances are transmitted.
In this paper the authors discuss the possibility of using recombinant viral vector vaccines as self disseminating vaccines, so attenuated live virus vaccines are not the only possibility..
Good quality research and publications on COVID, long-COVID, and the mRNA-LNP vaccine platforms is hard to find. Granting agencies have not awarded funds to do the research needed to explore issues like long-COVID, shedding, turbo cancer causes, etc. Much of what is seen in Substack, X, and elsewhere is lacking proper controls or draws conclusions that go beyond the experimental results, and more. As a result, there is an abundance of published research that is replete with serious flaws or outright biased. On the other hand, good science is getting blocked from publication. This needs to be corrected if science is to be trusted again.
McKernan and colleagues's research on DNA in the vaccine is an example of excellent work.
Pfizer was desperate to get the clinical trial started. They would have done and said anything. Pregnant women were excluded from the trial and anyone who got pregnant was dropped. It is common for pregnant and breast feeding women to be excluded from trials. Neither of us know if the FDA required commentary about how pregnant subjects are protected from environmental exposure. So Pfizer went to the extreme. If they really thought it was possible they would have required subjects to live alone and avoid close contacts. It was a red herring.
In my practice in Germany (specialising in coronavirus vaccine damage), I have a patient in whom we were able to detect the vaccine mRNA in immune cells in the blood (PBMC) two years after the last vaccination!
Until the Covid Plandemic, the most evil crimes were generally those against humanity.
These were ALWAYS by human(s) against other human(s).
Then hominid-derived pathogens Fauci, Baric, and other cloven-hooved spawn appeared.
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘀 - by both standard and medical dictionary definitions. They are organisms that not only cause disease, - they by their own volition - custom designed and fabricated one.
These excretions have 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝟮 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀,
not merely against humanity, but 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲.
They have not only sabotaged the womb, where life originates, but the genome which enables,
guides, maintains, protects, repairs and assures human survival and proliferation.
I would be interested to know whether blood samples from the babies of these mothers in the study showed evidence of vaccine sequences. This seems a lost opportunity for the researchers.
That plan would include me! Hope that those of us who might be carriers aren't shedding.
Would 1st like to see a crash program to develop a serum or other curative agent derived from the "Spreader Partiers". Their resistance and outcomes were better than anyone else's, because it was built around Native Covid (not Baric's Bastardized version).
Also, can ivermectin and allied products remove this problem?
There’s no plan, just consequences. There’s no serum, no magic fix. We must get this out of the human genome, that is all. And we need to be wary of stragglers who are shedding mRNA or prions or who knows what on us Purebloods, who are the human race going forward.
Dr. McKernan, this Mordechay et al. (2025) paper is the human biodistribution smoking gun you’ve been waiting for. Your sequencing work forced the world to admit the vials contain residual plasmid DNA and SV40 promoter – contaminants regulators swore didn’t exist. Now we have the downstream reality in living people:
1> Pfizer mRNA sequences still detectable in ~50% of samples more than 200 days post-injection,
2> Sperm cells positive at 168 days despite the blood-testis barrier and rapid turnover,
3> 3 of 6 unvaccinated pregnant women positive in blood and/or placenta while pre-2020 controls remain negative.
All of this only visible because they used nested PCR. Standard qPCR – the method used in every official “no persistence” study – would have missed it entirely.
The authors note the source of the unvaccinated positives is “yet to be investigated,” but when pre-2020 controls are clean and three never-jabbed women light up, shedding is the glaringly obvious explanation.
The fact that this degree of persistence and reproductive-tissue tropism exists at all – after Pfizer and regulators swore the platform cleared in hours and “stays at the injection site” – demolishes the foundational safety narrative they sold to billions.
Your plasmid findings + their months-long mRNA persistence in placenta and germline = the complete picture no regulator ever wanted published.
They rolled this out with only 14-day rodent data and no long-term human reproductive monitoring. Whatever else this study does or doesn’t prove, it proves the “transient, local, safe” story was fraudulent from day one.
Thank you for refusing to let them bury the sequencing data. This paper lands ten times harder because of everything you’ve already forced into the open. The receipts keep stacking.
🤬 Yep horrifying… and imagine, the ACOG still wants every pregnant woman jabbed. Sincere thank you for everyone’s involvement.
I did not have much interest in "shedding" until I thought again about the amyloid clotting showing up in the unjabbed.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-anomalous-amyloid (see comments)
If you look at the Pfizer paper from 2020 and what it says about being exposed - Initially I thought this meant that the participants had been directly in contact with the vials or "vaccine".
Now I realise that being exposed by "inhalation or skin contact" could mean that you have been physically close to someone who has taken the vaccine.
The phraseology is not clear, maybe deliberately.
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
Starting on p 67 of the protocol the investigator is instructed to report various "environmental exposures".
These included
1)"A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
2) "A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
3) "A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
4) "A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
Utterly horrifying. Thanks Kevin, hopefully this doesn't eliminate our species post ECDO/pole shift, though who knows?
Israel used Pfizer only, so the long-term mRNA signal they’re now picking up can’t be brushed off as “vaccine mixing” or some weird Moderna artifact. Moderna actually admitted in their patents that their LNPs were generating lipid–RNA adduct garbage and they tried to clean it up. Pfizer? Nothing. No fixes, no patents, no acknowledgement and they just kept running the same ALC-0315 chemistry that’s notorious for making lots of sticky, nuclease-proof lipid–RNA covalent complexes. I think those fragments are likely still in the vials even in 2024, and and that might explain why they’re still showing up in blood, placenta, and semen months later. I think these adducts are very hard to degrade and could last for months, or more. These lipid-adduct mRNA fragments are non-translatable but they could stall ribosomes and are inflammatory.
Do you think the lipid-adduct mRNA could be amyloidogenic? - As the vaccine spike is?
yes, I do. Or if a lipid adduct binds to spike protein in the cell say, forming a hapten, Could be a nidus to start these clots. One thing to keep in mind, is that many studies looking at spike protein forming clots, use recombinant wuhan spike protein. Not all report the endotoxin levels which could be problem. Could be the endotoxin in these studies, maybe.
🤢 Bad news.
The more that is discovered the less we know for certain about these dodgy products.
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/proximal-deception-the-convergent
Could these enhanced binding characteristics enable what we see as "shedding?"
Are we seeing evidence of unusually enhanced transmission? Where vaccine dna is detected this cannot be an infection.
How confident are you that that the dam holding back all these corroborations will eventually burst?
thank you for your continued painstaking and courageous work
Those who stand behind continuation of the administering of these jabs must be truly disturbed, mentally, to the point it can be opined of their being sociopathic, how else to describe such truly vile and pernicious, harmful behaviour, I mean good lord, what on earth are they thinking continuing to both advocate and defend the benefits of said drugs… run them out.. of science, name, shame every single one involved, who so behaves and equivocate… these people so engaged have forfeited their rights to being included in society of any descriptive… they’ve made their choice, their bed, the hill they choose to die upon, now proven wrong, we need to ram that result home… including the political class, whether they be elected or unelected political elites, out them all, shame them, their involvement as they can never ever be allowed to sweep or mitigate their actual involvement in what is tantamount to a massive grift… aided and abetted corrupt and fraudulent behaviour by those just saying
Kia Kaha (stay strong) from New Zealand
Today UNC Health emailed me and my 2 kids to remind us to get our flu and Covid shots. Great timing. One is 17, the other 24. I have no idea what it will take to stop them.
Thank You, "more than 200 days out"
;-(
alles klar
Why is this garbage still on the market! All vaccines should be incinerated and start anew with more stringent laws!
John, that would then involve getting rid of all those who have developed and pushed Dr. Mengelefauci's Ouchies and other quackcines! WHO in BIG HARMA A.K.A. NOTHEALTHCARE! and with POTUS Donald J. Trump (who I will always call "The King of COVID-19") JUST WHO is going to do THAT? 😲
You have to start somewhere to do what is right for the population! R U on board with keeping these for the sake of money or to rid of them for humanity!
John, I am NOT on board with ANY of them. . .but I have no control over ANY of them! The only REAL thing I and YOU can do is SURVIVE their evil plots . . .and warn others to NOT be deceived by them! 😲
There is no perfect solution for shedding. However most homes/multi-apartments and businesses in USA use RECYCLING AIR HVAC in their facilities, which means people inhale the same air that all inhabitants exhale. The alternative is similar to the pre-air-conditioning days: open windows, air goes straight-line from outside thru inside and out a window on the other side. Non-recycling (with heat and cooling recovery units) HVAC can do that too, draw it in, let people breath while the air is drafted over people's heads, then draft it back outside. Wrap Heat (and cooling) recovery ventilation piping units over outgoing exhaust pipes to pre-warm or pre-cool incoming air to save on utility costs. Outside air is disinfected by sun's ultraviolet waves, even on cloudy days, and may still be "cleansed air" after dark. What becomes a painful personal decision is whether to remain partnered with spouses or friends insofar as one is Covid-inoculated, and the other is not. That is my situation, though it took me almost two years to determine that my spouse of 50 years took 3 shots. It made no sense to me, with two years of receiving her shedding to leave her, so we remain married and make the best of it. And, I am sharing and buying her nutrients that aid health, strength, vigor and maybe a longer life for us old farts (73/75).
radar, so SAD for both of you with those Dr. Mengelefauci's Ouchies! Why did she take three? Taking natural healers greatly helps! My boyfriend did not after taking two Moderna in early '21 before I knew him. He died in 10 ~ 24 with multiple problems. I still have a blood clot that began during that time. I hope that you both survive!
Jayna, my wife is now 75; and was about 70 when she took the first course of two shots, then later the booster. She is a "sucker" for (regarding) loyalty. The message she got from Biden ads, etc. (though Biden's message came later, but all other messages were: Get the shot, save your loved ones. She was loyal to the messaging, and did it. Why she took a fourth Pfizer and later/last a Moderna, I have no idea. And the subject is still taboo between us (in fact I haven't told her that I know yet). My wife has changed a bit in the last few years. Her messaging is abbreviated, and I cannot tell whether when she leaves out "a sentence's Object of focus" if she thinks because of a context that I should understand, or whether she may be coming down with a dementia". I monitor it and tell myself, this is early onset Alzh's. He father died with Alzheimers, though as a young to mid-aged farmer he did get kicked unconscious in the head by a dairy cow, when milking her. The family said, he was never the same after that; though he thought he was fine. My wife had Rheumatoid Arthritis at age 11; in a hospital ward for 3 months taking 54 aspirin a day to keep her fever down, and then at home in bed for 7 months; and the RH etc. persisted all her life (except a couple of years in FL--I thought the sandy soil must have not held some mold/mildew that was in soil everywhere else we lived). Osteoarthrits began about 20 years ago. Daily pain all the time. That may have been a factor in taking the shots.
Believe me, I have been trying and for some have succeeded! Others I am still working on! I only hope they, anyone and everyone, will eventually wake up! But still have to get this shit off the market! Let alone just stop taking them! I have not had ANY vaccines since elementary and I am now 62! I was not scared of the latest plandemic either!
John, good for you! Rumor is that MORE are on the way! A helpful natural healing site is EarthClinic.com.
Question relating to finding of mRNA in non-vaccinated women and Sputnik vaccinated:
1. Do the sequencing primers distinguish between vaccine mRNA and viral mRNA?
2. How does the Spike sequence of the Sputnik vaccine compare to that in Pfizer/Moderna?
3. Did you keep track of which of these patients have COVID19 and when in relation to the date that the samples were taken?
Yes.. The C19 sequence is only 70% identical to the mRNA sequence. Its unmistakably different
I realize that this paper is not your research. I appreciate your response. I'm very conversant in molecular genetic techniques. I didn't realize the difference was 70%. I thought it was only the presence of the Proline-Proline pair in PP-Spike.
I'm just trying to hypothesize how an unvaccinated woman would have vaccine mRNA sequences in her blood, unless I'm misinterpreting the table. The authors themselves are confused by the origin of this mRNA and say so in their Discussion. Nick Huelshur (McCullough Foundation) posted on X that this was evidence of vaccine shedding, something I have never believed occurred except from mother to fetus or in breast milk. I'm just searching for an explanation that makes sense.
I did not have much interest in "shedding" until I thought again about the clotting showing up in unjabbed. See comments.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-anomalous-amyloid
If you look at the Pfizer paper from 2020 and what it says about being exposed - Initially I thought this meant that the participants had been directly in contact with the vials or "vaccine".
Now I realise that being exposed by "inhalation or skin contact" could mean that you have been physically close to someone who has taken the vaccine.
The phraseology is not clear, maybe deliberately.
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
Starting on p 67 of the protocol the investigator is instructed to report various "environmental exposures".
These included
1)"A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
2) "A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
3) "A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception."
4) "A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact."
I am a retired molecular geneticist, cell biologist, biochemist. There is NO mechanism that I can conceive of that would explain shedding of the mRNA-LNP vaccines. The term shedding comes from vaccines that contained attenuated live viruses. Depending on how the attenuation is done, a few of the viruses become able to reproduce in the host and the host then releases these active viruses into feces and other wastes.
How could any vaccinated individual produce modified mRNA encapsulated into a lipid nanoparticle? Without the lipid encapsulation, the mRNA cannot enter a new host's cells. Humans do not produce modified RNA even it their cells contain and were capable of reproducing mRNA. Our skin has RNAse enzymes that would destroy any mRNA that touches it. Our blood destroys unmodified mRNA that is not encapsulated in an LNP. Endosomes move between and within tissues.
The papers that have been written on the topic of shedding propose POTENTIAL mechanisms of shedding. NONE have been demonstrated to occur. The data in this paper would be the first, if it is true and reproducible. If you notice, none of the unvaccinated people in the general population had mRNA in their blood. Are they suggesting that there is something special about being or getting pregnant? Not all of the unvaccinated women had mRNA in their blood. The authors themselves cannot explain this. It makes no sense to me.
I read the Pfizer protocol in detail. I think this comment is a red herring. The FDA gave them a list of Serious Adverse Events to watch out for. Shedding is a vaccine concern for SOME vaccines. So Pfizer threw this in.
It is incumbent on these researchers.
Shedding is probably the wrong word to use. This paper may help. This mechanism of action of the LNPs was also shown with the product Onpattro. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6760118/pdf/41467_2019_Article_12275.pdf
Interesting article. Most of the study was done in vitro with cultured cells. The experiments that were in vivo in mice showed distribution of EVs within the individual mouse organ systems. I do not see how this could explain transmission from one individual to another. If you go back to the article, they say they detect vaccine mRNA in unvaccinated women. People are claiming that the mRNA is getting transferred to these women from their vaccinated male partners, presumably via sperm. To me, this is a real stretch of the imagination.
Thank you for this interesting comment. I quite understand your points.
However I cannot see why Pfizer should warn against "vaccine shedding" if it is an impossibility for this product. It is much more likely that they know there is a risk. This would also align with numerous anecdotal reports of people who were convinced that they had suffered ill-health from contact with vaccinated persons.
Rather than work from prior assumptions and facts taken on trust that we have been told about how these products work, it seems we need to look at everything again without any preconceptions.
Like you, I thought shedding was not worth considering as a risk, until recently when evidence appears to suggest that unvaccinated persons are showing signs of transmission.
However we have hitherto assumed that we have been honestly informed about the contents of these injections.
I seriously doubt that ANYTHING we have been told on the science of these products can be trusted. There are increasing suspicions that off-target molecules and complexes could be formed.
Maria Gutschi has written some interesting articles on this.
https://mariagutschi.substack.com/p/what-the-new-nejm-study-of-the-mrna
https://santiagod.substack.com/p/the-calamari-clots-why-the-white
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26926-0
Have you followed the findings on the amyloid micro-clotting?
Amyloid fibrils are found in the vaccinated but also in unvaccinated people. The unvaccinated people with microclotting can suffer from "long covid" but there are also cases where the person feels quite well, but on investigation, the microclotting is found in a blood sample.
The assumption is that these people have been infected at some point with Sars-Cov-2. and this accounts for these findings. However this is just an assumption and we cannot be certain how, or in what form, these substances are transmitted.
In this paper the authors discuss the possibility of using recombinant viral vector vaccines as self disseminating vaccines, so attenuated live virus vaccines are not the only possibility..
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014850/
Good quality research and publications on COVID, long-COVID, and the mRNA-LNP vaccine platforms is hard to find. Granting agencies have not awarded funds to do the research needed to explore issues like long-COVID, shedding, turbo cancer causes, etc. Much of what is seen in Substack, X, and elsewhere is lacking proper controls or draws conclusions that go beyond the experimental results, and more. As a result, there is an abundance of published research that is replete with serious flaws or outright biased. On the other hand, good science is getting blocked from publication. This needs to be corrected if science is to be trusted again.
McKernan and colleagues's research on DNA in the vaccine is an example of excellent work.
Pfizer was desperate to get the clinical trial started. They would have done and said anything. Pregnant women were excluded from the trial and anyone who got pregnant was dropped. It is common for pregnant and breast feeding women to be excluded from trials. Neither of us know if the FDA required commentary about how pregnant subjects are protected from environmental exposure. So Pfizer went to the extreme. If they really thought it was possible they would have required subjects to live alone and avoid close contacts. It was a red herring.
First of all Corinne, Kevin was not involved in the study, which is an Israeli study.
Second, you would know that, had you read both the link to the paper which he provided, and looked at the jpg of the title.
Here is the link to the paper itself, which may answer some of your questions and the rest you can direct to the appropriate researcher:
https://www.gavinpublishers.com/assets/articles_pdf/Detection-of-Pfizer-BioNTech-Messenger-RNA-COVID-19-Vaccine-in-Human-Blood-Placenta-and-Semen.pdf
In my practice in Germany (specialising in coronavirus vaccine damage), I have a patient in whom we were able to detect the vaccine mRNA in immune cells in the blood (PBMC) two years after the last vaccination!
Until the Covid Plandemic, the most evil crimes were generally those against humanity.
These were ALWAYS by human(s) against other human(s).
Then hominid-derived pathogens Fauci, Baric, and other cloven-hooved spawn appeared.
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘀 - by both standard and medical dictionary definitions. They are organisms that not only cause disease, - they by their own volition - custom designed and fabricated one.
These excretions have 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝟮 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀,
not merely against humanity, but 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲.
They have not only sabotaged the womb, where life originates, but the genome which enables,
guides, maintains, protects, repairs and assures human survival and proliferation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
𝗜𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲, 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁,
𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘀
Other than seizing their property, and probing their minds
(forcibly if necessary) for knowledge and evidence,
WHAT'S THE GOD DAMNED HOLD UP?
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘀.
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹 𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀 - 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗹!
𝗜𝗳 𝘄𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗻'𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 [𝗯𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗻𝗴] 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝗳, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹!
I would be interested to know whether blood samples from the babies of these mothers in the study showed evidence of vaccine sequences. This seems a lost opportunity for the researchers.
What is justice for all these souls?
ACCOUNTABILITY WE NEED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND TREASON TRIALS RIGHT AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
With the knock-on effects, it actually becomes important that ALL of the vaxxies croak, that the core of our species may be protected.
That plan would include me! Hope that those of us who might be carriers aren't shedding.
Would 1st like to see a crash program to develop a serum or other curative agent derived from the "Spreader Partiers". Their resistance and outcomes were better than anyone else's, because it was built around Native Covid (not Baric's Bastardized version).
Also, can ivermectin and allied products remove this problem?
There’s no plan, just consequences. There’s no serum, no magic fix. We must get this out of the human genome, that is all. And we need to be wary of stragglers who are shedding mRNA or prions or who knows what on us Purebloods, who are the human race going forward.
We carry the torch from here.
This substack is relevant as some of the unvaccinated also had these amyloid clots.
See comments discussion.
BREAKING STUDY: Anomalous Amyloid Microclots Found in 100% of the COVID-19 Vaccinated
In a cohort that was 94% vaccinated, every participant had amyloid microclots —the same pathology behind the large white clots.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-anomalous-amyloid