Was just saying to my husband, "I hope Kevin has a copy of that paper." Lol, and sure enough, you do!
The new journal, The Journal of Independent Medicine, needs a section called "Uncensored", where they publish good papers that have been removed by the legacy journals.
No surprises eh? A few days ago, a judge in a case in California adjourned a Gardasil case until September the night before a key witness was about to take the stand to present factual information that Merck don't want known.
Lol, I still find it incredulous that a peer review journal would rely on "fact checkers" for their rejection justification! I think your "stupid or lazy" assessment is freaking being kind! They should be fired.
Yet I find it ludicrous that the concept of a "fact checker" even exists in the first place- when did people become totally fine with out sourcing their own critical thought and information access?!🤔😐🙄🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Especially to some twat with a back ground in health journalism, sales, marketing (or my personal fav), business development and start up capital investment!😐🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Fact checkers are the pond scum of humanity and anyone with it on their bio or resume, I suggest you scrub that in the next year or it will tarnish you for life! Frankly, it might already be too late.
Readers, send a note to RFK Jr asking him to support any Gov't funding to cut support for Cureus for a 12-month year beginning as soon as a decision is made. Think of it this way. Medical Health Researchers, who research and write papers, ultimately do so for the good of the public, the public deserves "a read" as do every interested person. Failure to state problems and cite sources (all of them) is unprofessional. An alternative is to remove the decision making heads of Cureus, or to discontinue any Gov't support for Cureus, while those heads are in place. And, if Cureus has a way of getting around it, recommend RFK Jr to cut funding for the Government Agency that oversees it, or provides financial support.
Kevin, I am someone really trying to understand shedding. Why is all-cause excess mortality around 9% but cancer excess mortality only 1-2% ? Is this because of shedding?
Also, reading yesterday your substack When Climbing the Bradford Hill, I was also pondering, are the excess cancers occurring due to shedding. (Maybe old cancers are flaring up once vaccines are rolled out..still strange if it happens in the un--- cohort ) Am I on the right track at all..
One county where there are absolutely no medical regulations: a circumscribed Wild, Wild West of Medicine where doctors are free to prescribe even alternative medicine for the gravest of disorders and disease!
Let's free up medicine (at least in a single county) and then track the results!
Kevin, at about Minute 24 of the video, you were asked if there is sex bias in cancers in Japan, after revealing estrogen-dependent cancers specifically rose after COVID shots, maybe even displacing some of the other types of cancers.
I ran a VAERS search including foreign reports and using the System Organ Class (SOC) of "Neoplasms: benign, malignant, and unspecified." After normalizing to all reports for each sex, I was surprised to find that males had a slightly higher proportion:
1 in each 105 VAERS reports for males cited Neoplasm
1 in each 113 VAERS reports for females cited Neoplasm
There might be some twisted logic to explain this, by noting that males typically have a lower level, and therefore a lower signal, of estrogen -- such that standard increases in their estrogen signal may be more relatively perturbing to their bodies.
I wasn’t holding my breath that trump would do anything positive about the pharmaceutical industries danger to human life. Pharma is well practiced at paying people to do their bidding, to protect their profits. Trump is well practiced at taking money to boost his profits. I wonder if RFK will become frustrated by not fulfilling his goals. The corrupted medical journals (by pharma) is so dangerous to our well being but they get a pass, they get away with criminal behaviour but our governments do nothing. It’s so insane.
Always disappointing when Trump engages with the Pharma bros, Altman & Ellison.
Apparently, Team Trump is meeting with pharma. RFK Jr. wants ads off TV, & maybe Trump will "encourage" them to create a fund for the "vaccine" injured.
Was just saying to my husband, "I hope Kevin has a copy of that paper." Lol, and sure enough, you do!
The new journal, The Journal of Independent Medicine, needs a section called "Uncensored", where they publish good papers that have been removed by the legacy journals.
No surprises eh? A few days ago, a judge in a case in California adjourned a Gardasil case until September the night before a key witness was about to take the stand to present factual information that Merck don't want known.
Rhetorical question. Why would a judge do that?
It seems that everything surrounding pharma is so intrinsically protected. It’s very disturbing.
Lol, I still find it incredulous that a peer review journal would rely on "fact checkers" for their rejection justification! I think your "stupid or lazy" assessment is freaking being kind! They should be fired.
Yet I find it ludicrous that the concept of a "fact checker" even exists in the first place- when did people become totally fine with out sourcing their own critical thought and information access?!🤔😐🙄🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Especially to some twat with a back ground in health journalism, sales, marketing (or my personal fav), business development and start up capital investment!😐🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Fact checkers are the pond scum of humanity and anyone with it on their bio or resume, I suggest you scrub that in the next year or it will tarnish you for life! Frankly, it might already be too late.
#factcheckTHIS! #follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
I gave up publishing in the top tier western medical journals years ago. Big Pharma came in about two decades ago and captured these journals.
I don't get any accolades for publishing in 3rd world journals but my papers do not get retracted.
Here is my latest published this month in fact - Follow the Scientism: https://primerascientific.com/pdf/pssrp/PSSRP-05-163.pdf
KP, thanks. Will give it a read.
Try this new journal out>>>https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/
It may be good....or may not....but it's advert is "independent medicine".... Thanks for your work!!
Readers, send a note to RFK Jr asking him to support any Gov't funding to cut support for Cureus for a 12-month year beginning as soon as a decision is made. Think of it this way. Medical Health Researchers, who research and write papers, ultimately do so for the good of the public, the public deserves "a read" as do every interested person. Failure to state problems and cite sources (all of them) is unprofessional. An alternative is to remove the decision making heads of Cureus, or to discontinue any Gov't support for Cureus, while those heads are in place. And, if Cureus has a way of getting around it, recommend RFK Jr to cut funding for the Government Agency that oversees it, or provides financial support.
Kevin, I am someone really trying to understand shedding. Why is all-cause excess mortality around 9% but cancer excess mortality only 1-2% ? Is this because of shedding?
Also, reading yesterday your substack When Climbing the Bradford Hill, I was also pondering, are the excess cancers occurring due to shedding. (Maybe old cancers are flaring up once vaccines are rolled out..still strange if it happens in the un--- cohort ) Am I on the right track at all..
Hi Kevin, post says, "So download the paper and send it far and wipe." I'm pretty sure (but not certain) you meant to write "wide." :)
A Medical Freedom Zone is an awesome idea, Kevin!
One county where there are absolutely no medical regulations: a circumscribed Wild, Wild West of Medicine where doctors are free to prescribe even alternative medicine for the gravest of disorders and disease!
Let's free up medicine (at least in a single county) and then track the results!
Kevin, at about Minute 24 of the video, you were asked if there is sex bias in cancers in Japan, after revealing estrogen-dependent cancers specifically rose after COVID shots, maybe even displacing some of the other types of cancers.
I ran a VAERS search including foreign reports and using the System Organ Class (SOC) of "Neoplasms: benign, malignant, and unspecified." After normalizing to all reports for each sex, I was surprised to find that males had a slightly higher proportion:
1 in each 105 VAERS reports for males cited Neoplasm
1 in each 113 VAERS reports for females cited Neoplasm
There might be some twisted logic to explain this, by noting that males typically have a lower level, and therefore a lower signal, of estrogen -- such that standard increases in their estrogen signal may be more relatively perturbing to their bodies.
I wasn’t holding my breath that trump would do anything positive about the pharmaceutical industries danger to human life. Pharma is well practiced at paying people to do their bidding, to protect their profits. Trump is well practiced at taking money to boost his profits. I wonder if RFK will become frustrated by not fulfilling his goals. The corrupted medical journals (by pharma) is so dangerous to our well being but they get a pass, they get away with criminal behaviour but our governments do nothing. It’s so insane.
Always disappointing when Trump engages with the Pharma bros, Altman & Ellison.
Apparently, Team Trump is meeting with pharma. RFK Jr. wants ads off TV, & maybe Trump will "encourage" them to create a fund for the "vaccine" injured.
We'll see.