50 Comments
User's avatar
Bdanzer's avatar

I watched the segment and was struck by the DEI-esqueness of her testimony. As a non-PhD working in academia (unemployed currently), I've witnessed the absolute destruction of science/critical thinking due to these "good at math" un-creative thinkers. I've worked with some good scientists and doctors, but it's not the majority. I wonder if she has a "Trust the Science" poster in her office while she injects babies with a bio-weapon. Probably nothing that a couple bottles of Chardonnay won't fix.

Riki Tiki Tavi's avatar

Until we acknowledge the fact that "pseudo-science" is a profit machine we will fail to understand the meaning behind, "Trust the Science." In other words: "Trust The $cience"... Then there's the ethical consideration: Bioweapons are legal?

Just a Clinician's avatar

I did idly wonder whether/how much she'd been paid to testify...

SomeDude's avatar

so many of Them go around lying constantly, yet never suffer consequences for it

Paul  Barbara's avatar

They think! Come Judgement Day, they will pay.

Lisa Novakowski's avatar

The public still need accurate, honest information about these shots. Many have been damaged from side effects, yet attribute these symptoms to other things. I am tired of pharmaceutical and medical lies and censorship. Many counties hold onto the mistruths and wrong information. There is still vilification of people trying to point out the truth. On a side note, I am absolutely appalled with Health Canada.

Vivien C Buckley's avatar

Me too, but realize all regulatory agencies get funding from pharma. Around 2013 the Toronto Star did a full page article on our corrupted clinical trials. This is all so dangerous.

Lisa Novakowski's avatar

Thank-you for the information. I agree that this is dangerous.

RexesRule's avatar

Love the Senator's Eliza Doolittle-like wind up, and then BOOM!

Never under estimate a Southern Gentleman.

Sukey Watson's avatar

Well Bless her bought and paid for little heart.

Camilla's avatar

Thank you, Kevin, for having brought us so far on this that they can find no one who will come and be publicly dismantled by you in real time while on vide, so instead they send in those more people they are happy to sacrifice, like this woman.

Never thought I’d see the day but I’m eternally grateful you dragged them to this point. The world owes you a debt of gratitude.

Pamela Steele's avatar

Yes. Grateful for you and your tribe of truth tellers. Where would we be without you all?

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

What a nimwit . Cant stop shaking my head.

Rodney's avatar

Just lying through her teeth! How can anyone so shameless live?

Marty Ellenbecker's avatar

Therapeutic $$$$$$$$$

Steve's avatar

Thank you Kevin. Thank you for telling the truth. Peace.

Sukey Watson's avatar

Excellent repost. Also I forgot to mention that you also mentioned the additional information in the patent which stated that non clearance of DNA could be a serious issue. Both Pfizer and Moderna could not have been so naive as to think using a single DNAse would completely remove DNA, DNA fragments, and DNA/RNA complexes. Your research and the research of others demonstrates this beyond a doubt. I wanted to listen to McCullogh’s take down of this obvious pharma shill too, but have not yet located it, so if anyone has a link, please share and thank you in advance.

Marty Ellenbecker's avatar

To discourage future incidents like this, the Senate would do well to add the following spoken statement:

Separate from this oath, your testimony will be entered into the Senate Record, a public document from which judgments may be made regarding your character, current or future employability, as well as the granting or denial to you of various roles, opportunities or benefits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also calling out the senator for his failure to ask the witness

whether the purported dissolving of the membrane occurs

before or after the Cow Jumps over the Moon. 😁___ _ _ _ _ _ _ 🙄

The Offsc℞ipt Pharmacist's avatar

Great analysis and takedown Kevin. General pediatricians are well known as not being the sharpest pencils in the drawer, on average. There are good ones out there, but what you see here is typical.

TheFrontPorchMedia's avatar

Some of these worship demons, I believe.

I've got some footage of a woman, now the head of Pub Health at Yale, who displayed shit in her office that is sick...humanist messages...having babies is sin sort of stuff...just saying we shouldn't be surprised with this system being what it really is.

Being a Nancy's avatar

😆 oh geez I almost felt sorry for her,,,,,they could not find an actual scientist to push back on you because the science is primarily settled due to your and others research. I've been following for years now but today is the day I start fwd your posts to my 19 yo son because he recently decided to major in biology. It's the only thing about college that he likes.

Chris Kaz's avatar

Hey just sit there and lie!

Susan Liang's avatar

i like the poetry of the reply. It has a heatbeat to it.

mejbcart's avatar

It looks like those who protect the lethal gene technology, think, we all are, sorry, idiots...

"after the DNA gets into the nucleus it gets destroyed" ??? Nucleus is FULL of DNA, and its main function is to PROTECT IT, so how comes apparently now just that specific DNA gets destroyed? To my understanding DNA is there is order to be COPIED, via the wonderful work of histones and THEN send it via into the mRNA transcribed code into the cytoplasm to do the final work of building the protein world, into the cytoplasm full of enzymes doing the cutting work, but HUMAN enzymes, NOT bacterial, or viral.

Also that timing of appearance of that modmRNA in all the different organs must have a specific goal, as one can see, reproductive organs first.. I used genetics only as a tool to express proteins, many, many years back, so I'm not familiar with the issue of activating specific genes of specific organs, maybe the used plasmids carry such information? The science is being rewritten, that's another 'issue'..

And sorry, if that's all a nonsense what I wrote here!!

Thank You Kevin for posting that.