Thank you for all this work and especially the way you address the high school students regarding the strengths and shortcomings of their work. This makes my heart glad in so many ways: your commitment to decentralizing genomics, to supporting HS students, to sharing issue-oriented critiques, to advancing our collective understanding of all that’s happening. You’ve written a comprehensive review and clearly demonstrated to the HS students how science at its best (inclusive, interrogative, connected, expansive, rigorous…) works. A thousand hats off to you.
This is such a great point, these kids need to be encouraged. Who cares about typos or a couple of mislabels- instead, let the discussion begin. Was the FDA even aware what the kids were doing?lol
The work was done in an FDA lab under FDA supervision, and probably proposed by the FDA. High school kid knowledge is not sophisticated enough to know which tests to do. So it is very doubtful that the kids even thought this study up. They probably agreed because it would go on a CV and give them a wedge into the system.
On X, jikkyleaks has identified 3 FDA scientists who helped the kids. It isn’t clear if they had prior authorization from the FDA to study the jabs. It could be a signal that some employees in the FDA aren’t happy at the widespread denial of DNA contamination, then denying any possibility of integration with LNPs. As for the idea, I’m not discounting the HS kids. They follow TikTok and have much more awareness about side effects from the jabs than many older people do.
Thank you for recording this excellent run-down of the current situation in the context of the FDA high school paper, and not leaving out the egregious sour grapes commentary from Geoff Pain and the chaos agency of Denis Rancourt.
One of the things that needs to happen with the new administration if it is going to restore any trust in science and medicine at all is criminal prosecutions of those who conspired to have safety papers retracted.
This is a safety paper as was the Jiang-Mei paper. If we are going to continue with peer review then any paper that is not fraudulent MUST NOT be retracted on the basis of bullying by networks of people acting on behalf of pharma or the governments funding them and receiving kickbacks in return.
The people using their academic status to request retractions of non-fraudulent papers should be the ones being criminally investigated. We will keep pushing for this until the Jiang-Mei paper - and others that were politically motivated retractions - is reinstated.
And the fact that those "limits" (9 PPB I think) were derived when your body COULD see the foreign DNA and destroy it but now it is hidden inside the lipid nanoparticles with the mRNA and goes past your body's defences and right into the cells.
If you took the shots you potentially have foreign DNA in billions of your cells. That's cancer and autoimmune diseases.
Thank you Kevin! You make this complicated science, somewhat easier to digest for us simpletons out here. Very much appreciate your courage to stand up for whats right. And take all the grief that comes with; going against these vaccine religious fanatics. You ARE appreciated sir! Much appreciate the Great, kind, and motivational words for the students that performed this study. You are what is required for education and leadership. Much ❤️
Did anyone yet had the idea to invite the students on a podcast and ask them how they see the results of their study and their paper and what they think about the results and their findings in detail? Whenever I talk to "younger" folks I remind them that I did not chose to be born when I was born, so age difference does not mean anything when it comes to knowledge or thoughts on a topic. Obviously those students knew what they were doing and did it well. So lets hear them.... unless they plan to still have a career in any scientific field.
One of things I would like to know is their motivation to do what they did.
After I was shot injured and felt crazy in the head because the injuries were being ignored, I read my first paper out of MIT, Stephanie Seneff and others about these mRNA shots and predicting a rise in cancers, heart problems and autoimmune diseases. I didn’t want to believe it. My reluctance to believe is a common reaction because it’s a true horror story. I understand the public’s response and the need to disbelieve it. People will willingly believe the authorities discrediting any information on the danger of the shots. The authorities understand this. It is dumbfounding to me that there wasn’t any active, independent data collection on a technology that had never been tried on humans before to look for signals. The lack of a diagnostic test allows the authorities to continue their misleading statement that injuries are rare. But, it’s been shown by many with charts that mortality rates increased after the roll out. There is more than enough accumulated evidence to put a moratorium on these shots for further investigation by independent scientists. But that is not happening either. The hairspray recall is so anger making. The facade of looking out for the people. Grrr. Kevin thank you again for your grace and integrity. This latest study done by high school kids, you responded with empathy to encourage them rather than tear them down. It reflects a deep understanding and your strong character.
"People will willingly believe the authorities discrediting any information on the danger of the shots. The authorities understand this." It appears this reality may be at the very core, huge really, of the success rate of suppressing the truth about everything about these mRNA shots. So many humans took these shots across the world, and growing up beyond blaming those who didn't take these shots appears to be not in the cards.
So they tried to hide the DNA pieces by chopping them up very small, with the hopes that if only certain tests were applied, they would not be detected at all. Now the high school kids found them. What will it take to finally get these horrific jabs off the market once and for all? Fruit Loops suck, but they are injecting babies!
Agreed. It left me open mouthed and shaking my head for a few days.... The study raises more questions than answers.The FDA staff who helped them need to be deposed IMO...
A generous thought could be that maybe.... for once, someone in the FDA had a conscience (wonders of wonders) and was prepared to go quarter way to the truth, but still had to opine that the contaminants didn't matter, in order to keep their job.
Honestly some of the best science is done by people in high school, before they get completely baited away from reality by careerism yet are independent enough from the ideology of their parents and teachers because some teens are inherently more individualistic before it's beaten out of them.
I hope this report finds its way to RFK Jr, with EMPHATIC INCLUSION of your "merciful criticisms" and conclusions.
They will provide a necessary map through the upcoming jungle of whistle-blowing, nay-saying, distraction, CYA and ass-kissing that STANDS BETWEEN WISDOM AND OUR CURRENT PERFECT-OR-WORTHLESS SORTING OF TESTS!
Thank you for all this work and especially the way you address the high school students regarding the strengths and shortcomings of their work. This makes my heart glad in so many ways: your commitment to decentralizing genomics, to supporting HS students, to sharing issue-oriented critiques, to advancing our collective understanding of all that’s happening. You’ve written a comprehensive review and clearly demonstrated to the HS students how science at its best (inclusive, interrogative, connected, expansive, rigorous…) works. A thousand hats off to you.
This is such a great point, these kids need to be encouraged. Who cares about typos or a couple of mislabels- instead, let the discussion begin. Was the FDA even aware what the kids were doing?lol
The work was done in an FDA lab under FDA supervision, and probably proposed by the FDA. High school kid knowledge is not sophisticated enough to know which tests to do. So it is very doubtful that the kids even thought this study up. They probably agreed because it would go on a CV and give them a wedge into the system.
On X, jikkyleaks has identified 3 FDA scientists who helped the kids. It isn’t clear if they had prior authorization from the FDA to study the jabs. It could be a signal that some employees in the FDA aren’t happy at the widespread denial of DNA contamination, then denying any possibility of integration with LNPs. As for the idea, I’m not discounting the HS kids. They follow TikTok and have much more awareness about side effects from the jabs than many older people do.
If they were working in an FDA lab (which they were) wouldn't they hve to have had both FDA study approval, and prior permission?
Permission to access the facility, use the equipment, supervision of FDA lab employees, lab notebook integrity, etc is not hidden.
Thank you for recording this excellent run-down of the current situation in the context of the FDA high school paper, and not leaving out the egregious sour grapes commentary from Geoff Pain and the chaos agency of Denis Rancourt.
One of the things that needs to happen with the new administration if it is going to restore any trust in science and medicine at all is criminal prosecutions of those who conspired to have safety papers retracted.
This is a safety paper as was the Jiang-Mei paper. If we are going to continue with peer review then any paper that is not fraudulent MUST NOT be retracted on the basis of bullying by networks of people acting on behalf of pharma or the governments funding them and receiving kickbacks in return.
The people using their academic status to request retractions of non-fraudulent papers should be the ones being criminally investigated. We will keep pushing for this until the Jiang-Mei paper - and others that were politically motivated retractions - is reinstated.
"In my jurisdiction, Health Canada has measured and tested vaccine lots and all have found residual DNA fragments below limit required by regulators."
To be fair to Tyler Black, perhaps Health Canada hasn't progressed to the level of high school kids yet.
And the fact that those "limits" (9 PPB I think) were derived when your body COULD see the foreign DNA and destroy it but now it is hidden inside the lipid nanoparticles with the mRNA and goes past your body's defences and right into the cells.
If you took the shots you potentially have foreign DNA in billions of your cells. That's cancer and autoimmune diseases.
Thank you Kevin! You make this complicated science, somewhat easier to digest for us simpletons out here. Very much appreciate your courage to stand up for whats right. And take all the grief that comes with; going against these vaccine religious fanatics. You ARE appreciated sir! Much appreciate the Great, kind, and motivational words for the students that performed this study. You are what is required for education and leadership. Much ❤️
Just proves the point . My body my choice . Keep your filthy bio weapons out of my world .
Nicely put.
Did anyone yet had the idea to invite the students on a podcast and ask them how they see the results of their study and their paper and what they think about the results and their findings in detail? Whenever I talk to "younger" folks I remind them that I did not chose to be born when I was born, so age difference does not mean anything when it comes to knowledge or thoughts on a topic. Obviously those students knew what they were doing and did it well. So lets hear them.... unless they plan to still have a career in any scientific field.
One of things I would like to know is their motivation to do what they did.
I’ve reached out to the lead author of the study several times, but have not received a response.
Great way to also discuss and promote widespread distribution of the results!!
Great question!
After I was shot injured and felt crazy in the head because the injuries were being ignored, I read my first paper out of MIT, Stephanie Seneff and others about these mRNA shots and predicting a rise in cancers, heart problems and autoimmune diseases. I didn’t want to believe it. My reluctance to believe is a common reaction because it’s a true horror story. I understand the public’s response and the need to disbelieve it. People will willingly believe the authorities discrediting any information on the danger of the shots. The authorities understand this. It is dumbfounding to me that there wasn’t any active, independent data collection on a technology that had never been tried on humans before to look for signals. The lack of a diagnostic test allows the authorities to continue their misleading statement that injuries are rare. But, it’s been shown by many with charts that mortality rates increased after the roll out. There is more than enough accumulated evidence to put a moratorium on these shots for further investigation by independent scientists. But that is not happening either. The hairspray recall is so anger making. The facade of looking out for the people. Grrr. Kevin thank you again for your grace and integrity. This latest study done by high school kids, you responded with empathy to encourage them rather than tear them down. It reflects a deep understanding and your strong character.
"People will willingly believe the authorities discrediting any information on the danger of the shots. The authorities understand this." It appears this reality may be at the very core, huge really, of the success rate of suppressing the truth about everything about these mRNA shots. So many humans took these shots across the world, and growing up beyond blaming those who didn't take these shots appears to be not in the cards.
So they tried to hide the DNA pieces by chopping them up very small, with the hopes that if only certain tests were applied, they would not be detected at all. Now the high school kids found them. What will it take to finally get these horrific jabs off the market once and for all? Fruit Loops suck, but they are injecting babies!
Good work by students but the "results" seem like a very sneaky FDA limited hangout.
As in.... FDA crafts a study in 2023
Co-opts high school students who are unlikely to understand the implications of the findings, to deliver muted FDA-approved narrative.
Publish in a nowhere journal.
Don't put it on the FDA website.
Zero FDA integrity.
Hopefully the students will be asking more questions in their brain that they did in the article.
The curtains don’t match the rug in that paper.
Results are alarming and lots of text dedicated to diffusing it.
And I agree,
The experiment design was likely FDA crafted and executed by the kids.
But if I were at the FDA and I wanted to bury this, I’d use qPCR and show everything under the limit.
Agreed. It left me open mouthed and shaking my head for a few days.... The study raises more questions than answers.The FDA staff who helped them need to be deposed IMO...
A generous thought could be that maybe.... for once, someone in the FDA had a conscience (wonders of wonders) and was prepared to go quarter way to the truth, but still had to opine that the contaminants didn't matter, in order to keep their job.
Honestly some of the best science is done by people in high school, before they get completely baited away from reality by careerism yet are independent enough from the ideology of their parents and teachers because some teens are inherently more individualistic before it's beaten out of them.
The human mind really is that fragile to bias.
Well done, high school kids! I think I speak for @US_FDA and regulatory bodies around the world when I say:
"WE KNEW YOU HAD IT IN YOU"
They did know, didn't they?
In fact, they knew we all had it in us.
Hairspray recall? Well, the hairspray company didn't pay the FDA enough money then. Suckers! lol
Thanks for this expansion on the Maryanne Demasi report.
Cheers to the young Mavericks of this world … just maybe the young will speak up and change humanity.💥🙌🏼💝
FDA taken down by high school students they invited themselves.
Fraudci‘s speed of science seems to pick up pace in reverse.
I hope this report finds its way to RFK Jr, with EMPHATIC INCLUSION of your "merciful criticisms" and conclusions.
They will provide a necessary map through the upcoming jungle of whistle-blowing, nay-saying, distraction, CYA and ass-kissing that STANDS BETWEEN WISDOM AND OUR CURRENT PERFECT-OR-WORTHLESS SORTING OF TESTS!