19 Comments
Jun 14, 2023Liked by Anandamide

What amazes me is that ,instead of showing concern and digging in scientifically to learn the extent of the DNA contamination, people come after you and try to poke holes in the data you found.

If the FDA and CDC were doing their jobs, these jabs should have been pulled Jan 2021.

Expand full comment
Jun 14, 2023Liked by Anandamide

Thank you Kevin. The truth always wins. Peace.

Expand full comment
Jun 14, 2023Liked by Anandamide

Anadamide, don't know if you saw this, but you could probably write a good sequel:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37282738/

Expand full comment

So cool that your lab did sequencing for Ice Man - who was definitely past his “expiration date”.

Expand full comment

the expiring dates had been prolonged several times in Germany. So I think you are right.

Expand full comment

Nicely summarized Kevin.

For all who are interested in the vile vials, please share and vote in my poll

https://twitter.com/FluoridePoison/status/1669109562270707712

Expand full comment

oh so you put them in the freezer AFTER they arrived anonymously in the mail LMAO. non-quantified results. still meaningless

Expand full comment

PLASMID DEGRADATION. The issue of quantitation of intact plasmid DNA comes up. An indirect "reality check" is that the plasmids must be intact enough to transform (bacteriology, not cancer definition) E. coli to antibiotic resistance.

Expand full comment

And for dsDNA derived from Plasmid DNA, why is it a matter if those plasmid DNA are fragmented or full length and circular DNA? Like what difference does it make to its effect?

Expand full comment
Jun 15, 2023·edited Jun 15, 2023

You’d think maybe the governments that are paying for what appears to be an out of specification (non-compliant) product would be interested in a refund. Or, if they think it is truly safe and effective at least getting a replacement i.e. what they actually paid for and approved in the first place. Instead they pretend the problem doesn’t exist, and a bunch of arm chair critics come out trying to refute your findings with a bunch of what ifs.

Like you say, the easiest way to refute your findings is to actually pick up a pipette and doing the testing that would prove you wrong.

Expand full comment

Sorry to detour to another topic, but why was this sequencing technique not used for Khazarian genomes? I am very interested in why nobody still got this information and we can't evaluate Jewish heritage.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment