23 Comments
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Anandamide

Great work, as always, Kevin. Your efforts epitomize what good science is! Schrodinger's vaccine: until you open a vial and test it, it can be anything you want it to be. Alas, Kevin, you have collapsed the wavefront. Our overlords will NOT thank you for this! For me, I hope you will continue this effort. Thanks again.

Expand full comment

"Schrodinger's vaccine" 😆 🤣 😂

Expand full comment

"Schrodinger's vaccine" brilliant

Expand full comment
Apr 27, 2023Liked by Anandamide

Lol, that Chitra Pattabiraman, virologist and molecular biologist as the CSO level, does not know that LNP will incorporate any kind of nucleic acid, and not particularly discriminate between mRNA and DNA, is nuts!!! Great to prove it experimentally, Kevin, but anyone who has done lipofection of nucleic acids would know that: the level of bad faith or incompetence she displays here is mind boggling!

Expand full comment

exactly my thought

Expand full comment

Summing up your lovely work, using GMO Plasmids and E Coli or other bacteria to make synthetic mRNA will always result in a filthy toxic soup with unknown consequences.

Therefore any government that forms a Public Private Partnership to push mRNA jabs for any purpose is guilty of gross criminal negligence.

Expand full comment

Brilliant work and excellent rebuttal. One thing I'm still struggling to get my head around are the AZ and J&J vaccines. These are both dsDNA vector vaccines so once they get into cells, I am assuming they must enter the nucleus to get transcribed into mRNA. So, would these particular vaccines be more likely to reverse transcribe into genomic DNA? Putting it another way, Pfizer and Moderna have dsDNA as contaminants whereas AZ and J&J have dsDNA as their designed product. I'm probably missing an important piece of the puzzle and would welcome any clarification - thanks!

Expand full comment
author

Those are DNA based and no RT is needed for integration.

Integration frequencies published below.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41434-021-00278-2

Expand full comment

Let me know if you get a respond , I’m curious also

Expand full comment

Way above my limited understanding except to say they have written another dodgy paper to push their agenda and that this BAD, thank you

Expand full comment

What's the monoclonal antibody to rattle snake venom? Are there existing compounds like ivermectin that bind to the venom? Is there in siloco docking studies that are easily completed to find existing compounds? We cannot rely on the existing medical establishment. Venom is a bioweapon, including spike protein.

Yes, excellent work. Can your business do sequencing? If not, are you considering this type of work?

The purification steps in the mRNA process are weak. QA is non existent, the synthetic mRNA commercial system is broke.

Expand full comment

...could u post the links to the two substacks u recommend in the subscription tab, Kevin...i inadvertantly nd most annoyingly clicked past...😠...thanks!...

Expand full comment

Hello, and thank you for the post. Can you provide

1. a link to a paper that shows this for LNPs in one of the Covid shots being used,

"We instead see a 0.77CT and a 0.4CT offset which implies less than half of the DNA is in solution and the majority packaged in Nuclease resistant LNPs which will slip right through any ‘Fortress’ door."

The Halma paper https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/6/2/17 was only a review and did not itself do the LNP study.

2. Any paper showing that the DNA and/or RNA in a Covid shot content codes for and/or transcribes/produces spike protein and a dose-response curve for this?

Thank you in advance.

Expand full comment

Thank you: very important work and very clear explanation! Grim Reefer for the dead DNA and Grim Reaper for the live DNA ;=}

Expand full comment

So what is tje consequence if those DNA you detected are integrated into somatic or even germ cells? What is gonna happen to that cell?

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing this Kevin. I'm learning a lot from you!

Expand full comment

Wow. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I wonder why there would be more dsDNA inside the LNP? I wonder if you would expect the same to apply re the mRNA, inside and out?

Expand full comment
author
Apr 27, 2023·edited Apr 27, 2023Author

I bet they are in equal ratios. The DNA is most likely hybridized to the mRNA. The packaging isnt an oil in water emulsion where all the aqueous finds an LNP. It's a water in water LNP formation. So unless they use dialysis or nucleases, some nucleic acid will remain in the supernatent.

Expand full comment

Shouldn't they (at least) be DNAsing and RNAasing their solution to clean it up? Or maybe they think 'what's the point' since the same DNA and RNA are in the LNPs. Surely they tested their own solution? This is peak-slack, from a regulatory perspective. There's a case against Australia's TGA at the moment on behalf of vax-injured people. I just hope the claimants know enough science/regulatory expectation to argue all of the case on regulatory malfeasance.

Expand full comment
author

They could but then they have get rid of the nucleases before injection. Dialysis might be the best bet if the molecules are small. https://www.future-science.com/doi/10.2144/btn-2018-0133

Expand full comment

I suppose the DNA and mRNA could be in solution due to LNP breakdown.

Expand full comment

Yes

Expand full comment