48 Comments

No bunker , they knew, mistakes were not made …. It’s a Bioweapon.

Expand full comment

Believe so, "Sweet baby Jesus… Have they been in a bunker for 3 years" love it, lol.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much Dr. J, you always present the bad news in such a palatable way!!! Love and Blessings

Expand full comment

Well done. This is so important. A few of my favorite quotes:

“I find it odd that the paper lied in the abstract. The regulation is 1:3030 DNA:RNA. This is very clear in the EMA documents and this group is in Europe.”

“Of course this bullshit intro section tells you all you need to know.

Lets kiss up to the vaccine gods before we try to measure their risks. I know authors do this to butter up the Journals but they really need to stop. Have some stones and eliminate this narrative bias as it only weakens your paper to tattoo your pandemic bias in the intro. Most people versed in this topic stopped reading after this paragraph and the paper does have things we can learn from.”

“This is so bad it must be intentional.“

Expand full comment

So it has fallen upon you, your piers and your followers to vet pharma's patentable concoctions. Somewhere within the voluminous Federal agencies, administrations, departments, committees, bureaus, etc. there should be an entity to insure the safety and effectiveness of drugs. What to name it ?

Expand full comment

Dickens had it nailed long ago -- the "Circumlocution Office," which has expertise in "How not to do it."

Expand full comment

Good stuff! Truth always takes a period of evaluation to emerge but it is coming emerging. Some have responded by banning mRNA vaccines but it is still early stages with only a small percentage recognizing commonsense science. I equate the lack of critical thinking to those who thought Kamala Harris ran a "perfect campaign". There is cognitive dissonance that simply has no cure in some and those people will call this work ignorant misinformation no matter how scientifically sound. It is what it is and underscores why we have to keep pushing back relentlessly to counter those with this mindset who remain in authority. Some say they knew precisely what they were doing but I believe it is not that simple. Many have a form of sociopathy i.e., unconnectedness to others, that makes them unable to realize the harm to others as they gain authority. It should be defined as mental illness but society has not been that careful in its understanding how dangerous these individuals can be. We need to better define this type of individual and keep them out of positions of authority.

Expand full comment

"We need to.......," We should, or there should be......," "They should, or need to......."

It gets so tiring to hear so many vapid "fixes" to the problem at hand here. When will the commenters figure out that these sociopaths are guilty of indiscriminate murder, not just a bit of oversight or misjudgment. We who have eyes, see that liars are prone to either always, or just usually, lie about it, when caught in the act. They figure they have nothing to lose, and everything to gain by doing so. Plus it's a feather in their head-dress for their egos. They are the ones, to some degree, who consider themselves "above" others, above the law, and out of the sight of the Lord's watchful eye. They have a rude awakening coming! No amount of lying or tears for getting caught will dissuade the "Judge" of Righteousness. Forget about it! These monsters kill children!

"regulatory bodies of countries cannot lie about these findings - it would be beyond a breach of ethics" Cummoooooon, Jessica! Are you kidding?

We love you, but please!

R.

Expand full comment

Great and timely article putting those two papers (well actually only one paper but it isn't the published one) head to head.

Expand full comment

"It has been refreshing to see RFK-Jr Take the helm of HHS. El Gato Malo nails it."

Wow, that's some wildly optimistic screed that Bad Cat put out. I don't think I've seen anything like that level of coping before. Unfortunately it seems more like a set up for disappointment than a realistic appraisal of the situation.

The reason I say this is that I've also worked with people like he describes, and what stands out most for me is that they tend to be narrowly focused on specific highly technical problems. In short, they are specialists not generalists. What business managers call 'gem employees.'

What's lacking in his equation are the generalists who not only have a grounding in technical expertise, but in the techniques of actually managing the people tasked with realization of the goal. That's hard enough in an organization where people are at least somewhat dedicated to problem solving, but an entirely different matter when the people involved are either passively resistant to change, or run serious interference on it, which describes every government entity, especially the ones that matter where the most entrenched opposition to change normally resides.

As for RFK jr.

"RFK Jr. says any other nation would ‘level’ Gaza if attacked like Israel on Oct. 7"

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/rfk-jr-says-any-other-nation-would-level-gaza-if-attacked-like-israel-on-oct-7/

Looks like he got his wish.

As for building a health system, well some have tried, but apparently they were levelled as well.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/israel-palestinians-gaza-health/

Expand full comment

Kevin, it comes across to me that the bad guys are reading your posts and work hard at refuting it. They have the bully pulpit. Also, I read El Gato Malo. I just hope people realize the many layered depths of corruption surrounded by omnipotent power. I’ve learned in the last 4 years not to get optimistic about superman flying in to save the day.

Expand full comment

Is anyone testing the J&J?

Expand full comment

Is anybody else noticing that their posts get cut off. That’s been happening to me this week. I just posted and see it was cut off. Maybe substack is having a technical issue?

Expand full comment

"So the DNaseI step in the vaccine manufacturing process is a great way to hide the DNA while making it more dangerous for integration."

This bit supports 'intent to commit crimes against humanity'

Expand full comment

I thought about that too. Are they just ignorant or was it purposeful?

Expand full comment

In my naive and medically uneducated world, the essence of the 'Vax contamination' argument is reinforced through Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, etc, enjoying the ridiculous rule of ZERO LIABILITY!

Zero LIABILITY encourages Big Pharma to ignore Safety regulations in the 'Cowboy style' vax manufacturing process. The FDA are financially rewarded for every trial they inspect, approve or reject. The FDA therefore ignore many aspects of 'policing' these 'experimental' medicines/injections/vaxxes!

the bottom liner is that Pfizer, et al, can create any poor quality products because nobody is checking the validity and authenticity of their 'IN-HOUSE SAFETY Trials'. Any crap can get authorised under this fictitious Safety Verification process.

In addition, Pfizer, et al, can add, include, adjust and modify their medicinal products during production because the FDA (policeman) is not bothered to rock the boat by checking.

The contaminants continue unchecked, so 'under the table' experimentation can continue unabated. The unchecked 'contaminants' include materials that either modify vax recipient's DNA or damage, perhaps DESTROY, natural DNA.

The bottom line, Big Pharma have freedom to play with medicines for any purpose that could prolong the necessity of their products or cause even more health defects that would, in turn, justify more medicines being prescribed for increased financial gain!

The Medical Industry is rife with corruption and profits from every disease or virus they can introduce into the human race. NO LIABILITY enables the corrupt Gravy Train to run, unfettered and smoothly.

Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll all live longer without Corrupt Big Pharma and all who drink from that dirty but highly profitable trough!

Expand full comment

I agree with what you have written. Your name Mick made me think of a distant friend I have in the (UK), he used to work for New Scientist in London. After I was shot injured I emailed him and was very disappointed that he didn’t believe I was shot injured and din’t believe me about all the censorship. He told me if injuries from the shots were true, the people that work for New Scientist wouldn’t be concerned about the pressure or flak from writing about it. They’d tell it like it is. People can’t comprehend the depth of corruption but I was very surprised that he didn’t even entertain it.

Expand full comment

It seems he was 'brainwashed' within the cocoon that 'New Scientist' sounds like!

I've lost most friends and acquaintances who were 'brainwashed' from day one! If you try to inform them of how you learned about the elements of your beliefs, these people go deaf and distance themselves from reality. Reality scares them and they think if they blank you, they're safe ion their cocoon!

The truth is finally coming to light after 4 years of B/S and deliberate fear porn, but I don't expect the lemmings to realise they were wrong to reject truth without investigation.

Some are meekly coming back saying "Oh well, it's all over now"! Proving they're ripe for the next Scamdemic the new World Order want to launch. Next time, we ain't listening.

Unjabbed Mick. (I am originally from S. London but never in the 'fringe press'.)

Expand full comment

In my experience, the majority I know don’t believe me in fact they just had their 8th shot along with the flu shot. But, of interest the people who do believe me are the doctors I’ve had to see through this terrifying nightmare. They’ve had other shot injured patients. My ENT (who had an influx of new patients with complaints of tinnitus and loss of hearing believes it’s neurological. My family doctor is annoyed that there was zero guidance from the government.

Expand full comment

I had a face to face with my local MD regarding 'Excess Deaths', 'Informed Consent', his Hypocratic Oath ("First, do no harm"), the rapid increase in many health issues since the Death Shot was launched, etc, etc,. Whilst he didn't want to admit being part of the great Covid and DEATH SHOT con, he did say this; "Yes, it's a mess isn't it, But what can we do". Telling me he knows but can't get out!

Unjabbed Mick. (UK)

Expand full comment

Yeah,

It looks as though his thoughts about the mess are probably held by many a nurse and doctor, but are just too scared to voice it.

Expand full comment

So many blame the doctors. Doctors, in my opinion were left holding the bag with no guidance or strict instructions to collect data regardless of no proof. With no diagnostic test it’s hard to prove, just the way pharma wants it. There could be a test but suspiciously there isn’t one.

Expand full comment

Operation Warp Speed, or Operation Persistent Extermination?

Expand full comment

Reading this review of some new research on DNA contaminated COVID jabs, it's easy to imagine being inside of Kevin McKernan's lab, hearing the hottest scoop, (a.k.a. big spill of nerd tea). The good, the bad and the ugly.

(Fun style brings back memories of the research work before I switched into healthcare.)

Expand full comment

Thank God there are people who understand more than I do - and t hat she is on the right side!

Expand full comment