Paxton Groking Pfizer
Deceptive Pharmalism
Sonia Elijah gave this great summary of the onslaught of evidence that is building on the mRNA vaccines. From regulatory admissions to patent insights and what this might mean now that dozens of court cases are in the works.
Texas Lindsay goes on to probe Grok about the significance of this and gets an Elon GFY reply.
Someone needs to run this through the SnoopDogg Voice over AI module. I’m thinking Animal Planet meets Grok.
Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton may get us to discovery with Pfizer.
The official tweet from Ken Paxton can be found here.
Naomi covers this on the War Room.
And Brook’s case is still alive.
While all of this legal activity advances the Fact Chokers are having a hard time keeping up.
The Pfizer Funded Kate Yandall keeps recycling her old arguments as if repeating the lie will phase change it from propaganda into fact.
Her latest diatribe is linked here.
I’ve addressed these folks before . They know that I have posted a rebuttal to their nonsense but refuse to ever link to it when complaining about my expose’ of their email tactics on Twitter.
I’m going to go a bit deeper this time to show you the experts they keep recycling are not only incompetent but also paid off (aka on the NIH/NIAID gravy train).
Let’s take a few of their deep thoughts and see where they land
Did the Grand Poobah of vaccinology just conflate eating DNA to LNPs based Transfection of DNA through Injection?
Yes!
Their cult leader has spoken and regardless of what jibberish dribbles from their lips, they are here to receive the body of Offit.
Any B-rate journalist should be able to see this is a ridiculous statement (false equivalence) but since its coming from the Grand Poobah, the sheep have to print it.
Next up is Veldhoen who is completely clueless about the nuclear targeting sequence in SV40 (Dean et al) while simultaneously having his head in the sand on the biodistribution of these LNPs hitting immune privileged stem cells, oocytes and many tissues outside of the muscle, including, blood, heart, breast milk etc.
Yes, muscle cells don’t divide but the price you pay for this is the immune system attenuates its function on cells that are hard to replace. They are ‘non-classical’ immune privileged tissue.
Privileged is a word that describes many of these experts. They have NIH funding thus they are privileged to repeat what ever the NIH demands of them.
Now that the NIH has $550M in Royalties for these vaccines, do any of Kate Pfizer Yandalls experts have NIH funding?
You bet they do! Lets get to that at the end as their additional comments help marinate that thought.
So not only is Offit confused about oral versus injected routes of delivery and Food vs LNPs, he is oblivious about LINE-1 and the spontaneous integration of dsDNA documented by Lim et al. He can’t be this clueless. This is intentional squid ink or the man was born in the era of the rotary phone and likely needs his kids to install Apps on his phone.
Next up is an entirely baseless declarative from someone who should know better. Milavetzs goes on to speculate that the residual DNA is unlikely to contain the SV40 sequence. This is a sign of someone commenting on a topic they have rejected without reading. We actually quantify the SV40 promoter with qPCR and know there are Billions to 100s of Billions of copies of it and David Deans work nicely shows that only 72bp of that sequence is required for nuclear import. For the Ori and the promoter to be functional post integration 250-350bp is required and there are plenty of fragments in these shots that are this long. 1/50 molecules is over 1 kilobase. So this is someone who dismissed a topic before they read the details.
Milavetz is actually well versed in SV40. What would make him downplay this? More on his funding later.
They close out the Pfizer Pravda with a statement from the EMA claiming Process 1 vs Process 2 was compared and deemed to be of no consequence?
Really? I’d love to get Retsef Levi’s and Josh Geutzkow take on this as the FOIA I’ve seen suggest this study was only 252 people and the EMA never held their feet to the fire to complete it nor is most of that trial data public. There was a documented increase in adverse events discussed in the BMJ but the “Could[not] impact the safety of the vaccine”.
So let’s look a their chosen SV40 expert. Dr. Barry Milavetz
Funding sources
Funding from NIH for UND is Over $13M. A paper emerges that challenges the $550M royalty stream from mRNA vaccines that threatens the NIH’s credibility and they pull starving Barry out to downplay the SV40 contamination in these vaccines.
Looks like he’s mutating SV40. Can’t let the public stir about the risk of a virus he’s performing GOF on. Well, this was mutagenesis decades ago but he currently has SV40 grants from Fauci’s NIAID agency. Does Fact Check.org think they can be the arbiter of science when overt conflicts of interest like this are never mentioned?
Kate Yandall wasted no time pointing out my lack of PhD and my focus of research being in Cannabis and Psilocybe. Not only was she willing to make a hyperlink to our company website, in the same sentence, she avoided at all cost linking to my rebuttal of their hit pieces. Just had to underscore my undergraduate degree in biology related to the cannabis-mushroom industries.
No mention of my work on the Human Genome Project and subsequent invitation to the Whitehouse and House of Lords.
No mention of the dozens of patents and multiple genomics companies Ive founded that transformed the industry. These aren’t my words but those of James Watson and Kevin Davies who have each written books about the SOLiD sequencers roll in the race to the $1000 genome. Even Modernas patents speak to using DNA and RNA purification kits I developed at Agencourt.
No mention of the fact that with my humble undergrad background I have more citations than the experts Kate brings to the table.
This is deceptive journalism/pharmalism.
So we have established
1)Paul Offit likely still uses a rotary phone
2)Kate Yandall is funded by Pfizer and writes redundant wall paper on this topic
3)The experts they rely on have funding from NIH/NIAID which has at least $550M in Moderna Royalty. Kate Yandall/FactCheck.org never discloses this conflict of interest while they libel and slander any voice raising concerns over the SV40 contamination in liability free mandated injections.
I hope the next grant tastes good. For advice on how to handle this game of deception, I encourage you to reach out to Kristian Andersen. He is well versed at bending the science to the tune of the psychopaths in charge.
While the fact checkers scribble more biobabble, the lawsuits are building. One day they will point these at the FactCheck.orgs of the world for facilitating the public deception now mentioned in Ken Paxton’s case. The Fact checkers are involved in criminal racketeering and the public will be welcoming the addition of these organizations to the RICO cases that are building.
“Never confuse education with intelligence, you can have a PhD and still be an idiot.”
― Richard P. Feynman
We know who the real experts are. They are in their labs with their pipettes and test equipment; they are presenting their findings to parliaments around the world; they are selfless, they are caring; they are exposing a crime against humanity; they are making a huge difference.
Kevin, the difference between you and them is your passion, curiosity. Curiosity equals intelligence. Plus, you’re not protecting your income stream. No conflict of interest.