PlasmidGate
A whole lot of discussion about Adulteration this week.
This weekend was quite active. Many casts with
Chris Martenson regarding the Health Canada SV40 admission.I also spent time with Mary Holland and Brian Hooker on SV40 and the evidence that this looks like a deliberate intent to deceive.
Meanwhile Noe’ dropped the evidence for the Health Canada emails. The shills were out in force claiming it was all fake. Noe brought the receipts.
This is where it gets weird.
“The benefits still outweigh the risks”
Although they performed no genotoxicity studies?
The disclosures all came back fully redacted.
What are they hiding?
Meanwhile, someone asked the EMA about their thoughts on the SV40 issue. I can’t vouch for the veracity of these emails so I have sent in my own inquiry.
If you believe this AskEMA response below, it appears they were also deceived but they are OK with this deception as their Pharma partner told them “these are not the droids you’re looking for”.
“The sequence is not directly relevant for plasmid production in E.coli”.
Really?
Its only the promoter directly in front of your antibiotic selection gene? Without the Neo/Kan gene do you have any plasmid production? There is a remote AmpR promoter but that is also hidden by Pfizer.
SV40 also happens to have some consequences for the mammalian cells these will be pumped into. I am baffled at what a stone face lie this is.
“The applicant did not specifically highlight the SV40 sequence as it was considered to be a non-functional part of the plasmid”.
Non functional- you don’t say?
Did they even bother to google check Pfizers claim regarding this being a non-functional part of the plasmid? Do they know that without a promoter, there is no Neo/Kan selection and the whole process falls apart?
SV40 Promoters are active in both Mammalian cells and E.coli so the EMA has likely been given another Pfizer Pfib and should reconnect with them over the functionality of this hidden sequence.
In summary, the perpetual apologists for this have had a bad week and the memelords are reminding them of it.
likewise, team censorship is now crying about the removal of Michael B. Eisen from eLife’s board over a charged Onion tweet.
You can’t reply as Bik doesn’t want to hear about her hypocrisy. She is not only known for being wrapped up in a scam company that got raided by the FBI, but she actively tried to get papers retracted that were simple “hypothesis” papers. She loves cancel culture and can’t comprehend that she’s actively building an enslavement architecture that will ultimately be used against her… as it just has been… but she’s obliviously screaming into the void about the cancel culture she fermented.
She likely sees nothing wrong with this next level meme.
Or this, as she probably thinks it’s ‘wrong think’ and should be fact checked, labeled as misinformation and brought to the principles office.
When you lack principles, you eventually find yourself swimming with sharks who eat their own.
Follow your principles and you’ll find yourself surrounded with people who understand doing the right thing attracts others that are in this for human freedom. They understand opportunity, growth and prosperity is the first derivative of human freedom. Flourishing is only found when people are free to associate how they please and trade in a voluntary basis.
The central planners and thought police, are fundamentally frightened people that want the security of the state to pacify their conveyor belt of hobgoblins. They’re naive to the cancer they xenograft onto their soul with this Faustian contract.
Entrepreneurs stepped up and made a matching company for safe blood. At this stage I don’t want a transfusion from vax infested blood.
It’s time to start testing the blood supply. The regulators are never going to do this.
It’s up to entrepreneurs.
Brilliant comment - "Follow your principles and you’ll find yourself surrounded with people who understand doing the right thing attracts others that are in this for human freedom"
Yourself, Jessica Rose, a whole bunch of ex Saffers spread across the USA, Canada, UK (there are so many and you make me so proud of SA. This country produces great minds and critical thinkers - I've missed a lot but Kory, Marik, Lawrie, Hodgkins you are all amazing), Norman Fenton, Jikkymouse and his/her entire mouse army).You guys and Twitter have done more to expose MSM, the corruption within the scientific community and educating and keeping the public sane and safe than you'll ever realise. The way you've approached this has worn off on the people you've touched and the world is better for you. Sincerely, Thank you 🙏
Molecular genetics is not my strong suit, but looking into literature of SV40 incorporation into plasmids it is easily discoverable that genotoxicity studies had to seem vital to many overseeing the vax development. Referring to the SV40 72 bp tandem repeat as solely a promoter might be confusing since I envision promoters as a proximal sequence upstream of the gene. This might underlie the apparent lack of alarm by some as this sequence is not accompanied by the SV40 oncogene. The more complex function of the 72 bp SV40 element is generally referred to as an ENHANCER that is employed in transfection plasmids to greatly increase trans gene expression in all mammalian cell types. Here is my level of understanding: by binding multiple transcription factors, it functions as a DNA nuclear-targeting sequence (DTS) sequence to shuttle DNA into the nucleus and also increase expression of flanking genes (which can be up to 70 kb away). Any background info anyone can share to inform me on the relevant mechanisms is appreciated. BTW, here is a good chapter on the technology/concerns of enhancer elements in plasmids for gene therapy (esp insertional mutagenesis): https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-4531-5_1