24 Comments

Just informed the Prime Minister of Australia and the Federal Health Minister, plus selected journalists of your excellent work with a direct link to your preprint.

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

My Tweet led to 5 profile views, encouraging.

Expand full comment

Hi Kevin & Geoff

"dsDNA contamination of sequence encoding the spike protein wouldn’t require LINE-1 for Reverse Transcription and the presence of an SV40 nuclear localization signal in Pfizer’s vaccine vector would further increase the odds of integration. This work does not present evidence of genome integration but does underscore that LINE-1 activity is not required given the dsDNA levels in these vaccines. The nuclear localization of these vectors should also be verified."

I left a brief note of Jessic Rose sub stack (I have ANOTHER ban form Twitter) asking some questions on this plasmid contamination.

Can someone please "Average Dumb Guy" this for the 5 billion that have taken the injection.

To be able to drive change (especially with politicians, as they aren't bright at all), we need to let people know what this plasmid contamination could mean. The cold hard facts, including ALL the possibilities. It is essential that people know and understand what the possible risks are. Even if they have not been proven yet.

I get that wherever the LNP (or degraded one / naked DNA or RNA) transfect, there are HUGE markers for metastatic cancers.

But what of the gut bacteria contamination that is talked about? Is this is a possibility?

Will the gut bacteria merely incorporate the wuhan sequence into it?

Will it only incorporate the DNA?

Will it do both?

Will it become resistant to the antibiotics?

Can it produce spike protein?

Will it pass the applicable items above, on to the rest pf the bacteria in the gut?

I have thought about this and cant really see how the LNP/DNA/RNA can get across the gut lining to the microbiome and bacteria there. This I see being done via exosomes.

If so, my questions right above apply to the exosomes.

Then lets say one or two maybe all of my questions get a "yes". Then how does this affect us who have not been injected? I know that bacteria can be passed via stool, unwashed hands, infected ppls exosomes. So could the plasmid issue "shed" onto the control group?

And if so, what health effects would this present? Would it only affect those with leaky gut (exosomes, vagal nerve, CJD).

Then what treatment would we start needing to look at?

My apologies for jumping like this. But as a Risk Manager, this is how my mind is geared to work. I paint as complete picture as I can, And then I begin building the Risk Management Programme, where each Section is filled in and populated.

I really do believe that you need to present it to the Globe in such a format, in order to get traction and understanding. Its how I get my clients to see the risk and manage, mitigate or "treat" it. They are all EXPERTS in their respective fields. So I go to great lengths to break it down into simple constructs for each specialist to understand the others, the whole picture and see how it all works together

We are now over 2 years into this madness and the masses DONT properly understand what is so wrong. They see people dying, they see the cancers, the see the obvious. But they cant see the bigger picture. Or connect the dots. This is where Jikky has done so well, Arkmedic even better.

Its where I have been trying to close the gap between what you experts write, and then I try learn, ask questions and convey to large ground level groups in Average Dumb Guy language. Hence the pseudonym I use when writing.

You are ALL VERY BRILIANT! But the other 99.9% of the planet don't talk science or microbiology.

So please can someone assist? Perhaps you can ask Jessica to write, her stacks are very easy to follow, and she connects well with the masses.

But people need to know.

And if all that I have asked is crap. Then please let me know. One thing I am not is ignorant. I don't mind being wrong, making mistakes, or looking foolish. But I refuse to be ignorant or put my head in the sand. I am here to learn, and to make provisions and plans where they are deemed necessary.

No Human Being should ever not have FULL INFORMED CONSENT & ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION of what could be impacting their lives, health and futures.

Thank you all for your wonderful work, and all the time and personal sacrifice you have made for Humanity

Expand full comment

Like you, I am learning every day. The key point to emphasize to the politicians I think is that the mRNA technology is fundamentally dangerous from so many angles that it must be banned globally now. The answers to may questions are not known, or worse could be kept secret by the profiteers. Pfizer has an ongoing Teratology study!

Expand full comment

Don't be soft in the head. Your information is going straight in to the secure waste disposal. These people are all complicit.

Expand full comment

Little known fact. I was awarded Life Membership of the Australian Labor Party after 40 years service and Dan Andrews presented me with a Medal and Plaque. Then I dumped them. I have met 5 Australian PMs. My aim is to constantly needle them and those who monitor their social media.

Expand full comment

Potentially one of the most important scientific papers written. I would urge any laboratories with the equipment and skills, to seek out vials of vaccine, and carry out confirmatory work as a matter of urgency. I would encourage all citizens to alert your Regulatory authorities of this work. I would ask the Regulatory authorities to request immediate retrospective analyses of any retained lots of vaccines, using the assay’s described, and to make this data available to the public.

If the future of medicine resides in novel mRNA and gene-based therapeutics, it is essential to ensure the Regulatory framework is fit for purpose. This work demonstrates widespread failure by the Regulators. Regulators should be exclusively funded by the taxpayers and not by the industry they regulate. They need to get their house in order, the future of human health depends upon it!

Expand full comment

I cannot fathom how any intelligent person would believe that the future of medicine resides in novel mRNA and gene-based therapeutics. I happily remain a non-genetically modified human and encourage everyone to strive to avoid this toxic technology. Let us remember how many products Moderna brought to market after successful safety testing, prior to the COVID vaccines: zero!

Expand full comment

Let me clarify, I agree with you 100% Kathy. Unfortunately, the Big Pharma train is moving inexorably in the direction of mRNA and gene-based therapeutics. My point, given this inevitability it is essential the manufacturing and regulatory framework is fit for purpose. My personal view, current technology is incapable of delivering error free products. Exhaustive substitution with N-1-methyl-psuedouridine creates a known error rate of 1 in 4000bp, that’s unacceptable. I have no idea, but maybe this will improve in the future. Today, however, manufacturers and Regulators are running roughshod over these types of products. For example, the MHRA claim, FastQ files are available at batch release and QC testing sites for each lot produced, and yet they have also admitted to never calling upon this data – why? They are using proxy tests incapable of detecting significant quantities of dsDNA and are applying an unsuitable Regulatory framework for approval of mRNA products by describing them as “biological products”. All of this must change. An FOI covering some of these topics here:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/test_data_and_results_for_each_b#incoming-2279324

Expand full comment

The Big Pharma train is one that needs to be avoided in favor of the powerful herbs that have worked for thousands of years. The chemical industry consists of pharma and weapons manufacturing. There is no way to know which product you are partaking of anymore. Take at your own risk. For context, I've been a family physician for 25 years.

Expand full comment

This is amazing. Thank you, will be sharing

Expand full comment

Electrophoresis done by another researcher showed 1.3 kb DNA band with 1.6% agarose gel Genome DNA isolation kit.

What do you think this band is?

(50:05 ~)

https://rumble.com/v1m8i9o-alexandra-sasha-latypova-pharmaceutical-products-have-been-removed-for-thes.html

Expand full comment

oh for fucks sakes...for us lowly slugs... How does this differ from what you've brought out already???

You need a common language explanation/summary if you wanna reach the real people.... or else ya may as well be pissing into the gigantic void left by those who haven't sold out to big pharma

Expand full comment

Here's a little bit of explanation: dsDNA is used as a diagnostic test for autoimmune conditions. It's not something you want floating around in you.

Expand full comment

So dsDNA is immunogenic?

Is it true that the cationic PEG lipid shells used by themselves are already cytotoxic that will cause cell deaths with the dosage injected by each shot?

Expand full comment

My understanding is that it depends on the dsDNA as to whether or not it is immunogenic. This is not my field of expertise.

Expand full comment

I'm interested in the electropherogram of DNA based Tape Station in Figure 6.

You wrote "DNA hybrids with N1-methylpseudouridine mRNA may provide enough intercalating dye cross talk to produce a peak."

So, I think the apparent DNA size is larger than the true size due to N1-methylpseudouridine mRNA.

Did you, or will you, quantify DNA after treating RNase? I think the sharp peak will be shifted to a smaller size after treated with RNase.

To further examine the sharp peak, IP-RP-HPLC with MALS analysis and denaturing gel electrophoresis might be helpful.

https://www.covidtruths.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Annex-1-Draft-3.2.P.2.2-Drug-Product.pdf

Expand full comment

Thanks Kevin, do you know is it true that the cationic PEG lipid shells used by themselves are already cytotoxic that will cause cell deaths with the dosage injected by each shot?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 11, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Because, I've seen no compelling evidence for it and the tools were using don't look for it.

Expand full comment

Kevin McCairn has already run a number of vials through a spectral analysis of some flavour. No Graphene. However, he did find some samples without phosphorous - i.e. no mRNA backbone ergo no mRNA.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 14, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Which is it? Dozens or hundreds?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Apr 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Dude ! They're in french and spanish. I ain't that keen.

Expand full comment

I'll have a look at them mate but I don't see how you can find graphene with electron microscopy et al. because it only tells you there's a carbon atom - not that there's a carbon atom in a particular allotrope. That's my understanding anyway. You can, however, exclude graphene if you don't find carbon.

Expand full comment