16 Comments
User's avatar
TFish's avatar

Keep going. I hear the groan of inevitability churning in the background!

Expand full comment
jay swift-ride's avatar

What blood test would reveal presence & what counter for elimination ?

Expand full comment
jay swift-ride's avatar

IF ELIMINATION POSSIBLE ..?

Expand full comment
Dr. Alan Bradford's avatar

What are the implications of this? Cancers, I assume?

Expand full comment
Tracy C's avatar

Yes. Lots. Metastatic.

Expand full comment
Caroline's avatar

Great work again. Forensically unraveling this mess piece by piece and so great to see this being done by different scientists across the globe, all validating and enhancing each others work. The language barriers will slow this down but the truth will out eventually .....

Expand full comment
GeoffPainPhD's avatar

Reverse Engineering of Pfizer jabs is wonderful!

Do you have a Molecular Weight calculator for the 72 bp insert, or any other interesting sequence of the string?

Expand full comment
kung pao bio's avatar

I would expect some gel electrophoresis controls here at the very least. Couldn't these just be artifacts of the assembler and tools being used?

Expand full comment
Hilary Butler's avatar

Have you read all the other substacks from February 16th, which detail the methods etc?

Expand full comment
Alberich's avatar

Cells that received a DNA fragment with the SV40 promoter and the neomycin resistence gene (neoR/kanR) would produce the protein "neomycin-kanamycin phosphotransferase". This protein would be detectable by immunostaining or ELISA and possible antibodies produced by the patient would also be detectable.

The vaccination cannot be undone. Of course the immune system does its best to eliminate mutated body cells.

Expand full comment
Anandamide's avatar

Not if the vaccine hits immune privileged cells.

Multiple studies show spike and nucleic acids persistence suggesting the immune system isn’t clearing these things in some people.

Expand full comment
Jessica Rose's avatar

"The SV40 early promoter contains at least three spatially distinct elements: (1) two 72-bp repeats comprising the enhancer sequence; (2) three 21-bp repeats, each containing two (G + C)-rich motifs; and (3) the TATA box or Goldberg–Hogness box." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079660308603499?via%3Dihub

Expand full comment
LakBerry's avatar

The sv40 t antigen attaches to the oligomeric complex causing amyloidosis.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 13, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Anandamide's avatar

It’s illegal to steal live inventory.

The analysis can only be performed on expired lots.

Expand full comment
Joy's avatar

If they had nothing to hide they would allow access to the lots for testing.

Expand full comment
Anandamide's avatar

Covidissonance: when qPCR is quantitative for viral detection but non-quantitative for vaccine detection.

Expand full comment