37 Comments
User's avatar
Julian Gillespie's avatar

thank you Kevin,

a very thoughtful substack

.. Phillip Buckhaults' testimony was courageous, and done so well

consummate professionals, both of you

Julian, Australia

SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Thank you, Julian, for the work you're doing. Following on Dr. Buckhaults presentation was Dr. Janci Lindsay. Dr. Lindsay shares the same PhD as Dr. Buckhaults. You may have seen her testimony, but if not, well worth the watch: https://youtu.be/mjQQ7kkj3Bs?si=gsKl0FMZsz_z4is1

Dr. Lindsay is pressed for time, so she focuses her time on discussing the SV40 promoter, which clearly has concerned her deeply. She begs for these injections to be pulled from the market...

Julian Gillespie's avatar

thank you STL, yes .. have listened closely and shared widely

SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Wonderful! Thank you. I am currently in the midst of writing to Dr. Joe Ladapo, Florida Surgeon General. He recently updated the State's "guidance" on the "booster" injections, recommending them only to those 65 and older and only after reviewing with their doctor the State's safety and efficacy concerns. This is absurd. Others are calling for their removal altogether, but we're still getting, "Talk to your doctor..."??? Meanwhile in Florida, nearly 12 county Republican Committees and the Republican Liberty Caucus have passed resolutions calling for "banning the jab" altogether.

Denis Rancourt in his most recent report on COV(D-19 injections across the Southern Hemisphere specifically called out governments' "baseless public health policy of prioritizing elderly residents for injection with COVID-19 vaccines…” On top of this, we have Mr. McKernan's revelations backed up by Dr. Buckhaults, further reinforced by recommendations by Dr. Wafiq at Brown University in Rhode Island to get this junk examined.

I will include in my letter to Dr. Ladapo reference to Rebekah Barnett's excellent 25 Sep article in the Spectator.

Rebekah Barnett's avatar

Epic. In the sad and thought provoking way.

Steve's avatar

Thank you Kevin. I have followed Dr. Rancourt's work since April 2020 when he published "Masks Don't Work". I also read his analysis of the southern hemisphere; the key take-away being that, at the time of publication, the number of deaths caused by transfection exceeded 13 million people. It is very difficult for people to grasp that these deaths were predicted, the perpetrators own publications show the work that was conducted and the goal, which is de-population. Please note that Dr. Rancourt has written about the fact that ALL economic systems always drift towards totalitarianism, and that totalitarian systems always fail. The United States embraced eugenics programs in the 1920's and 1930's - read "War Against The Weak", by Edwin Black. Finally, please watch this video which connects a lot of the dots:

https://twitter.com/gunthertree2/status/1702140946668810462

I'm an MIT dropout. I was an "A" student. I was a decent applications "engineer". I can see patterns that I have not seen since 1930's Germany. Dr. Peter McCullough can obviously see them too:

https://rumble.com/v3azedn-modern-medicines-great-controversy-dr.-peter-mccullough.html

In the United States, we have never been to this point before. Thanks to honest, truth-telling warriors like you, we are making progress in showing people the details of the greatest crime in history. I pray that you continue your very important work - thank you.

Finally - NO PERSON should have ever received an mRNA product, especially seniors. Peace.

Steve's avatar

His opening statements are 100% incorrect. See Mathew Crawford's work at Rounding The Earth Substack - the transfection shots never had any efficacy, ZERO. The transfection shots did not save a single life - ZERO. See Dr. Denis Rancourt's work. He also states that there were no alternatives - 100% incorrect; Fauci published a paper in 2015 that identified hydroxychloroquine as basically a vaccine for corona viruses. The spike protein is a toxin - it should never be introduced into the human body. A lot of his testimony is following the big pharma narrative, designed to make people think that people actually had "good intentions" with the shots. Stick to the contamination professor, your comments regarding efficacy and intention will be proven false in due time. Peace.

El Recibo's avatar

Right on, Steve!!! Buckhaults is waaaaaaaay too sanguine. He's also ignorant. He's saying there are perverse incentives and there needs to be more regulatory oversight, but the vax was A-OK!!! VAX AWAY!!!! As well as saying he and others should analyze the vials, WHICH IS PROHIBITED BY THE LAW!!! This was part of the DoD plan! These senators are just about par for the course....what a bunch of morons!!

SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Agree completely, Steve. I found Dr. Janci Lindsay's presentation far more compelling. She honed in on that SV40 promoter about which Buckhaults said not one word.

It drives me around the bend when anyone simply repeats the same old baloney (you know what I want to say) about "saving lives" or "reducing hospitalizations," or my fave -- "we" had no alternatives. What utter bullshit. There. I said it. 𝑰 𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒚 𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕, but it's especially annoying when someone with credentials that everyone craps over says it.

Steve's avatar

"What utter bullshit. There. I said it. 𝑰 𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒚 𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕, but it's especially annoying when someone with credentials that everyone craps over says it." - I cannot agree more. I learned long ago the true value of "credentials". Lies, delivered by any means or method, continue to disgust me. We are surrounded by moral cowards who lie for a living. Peace.

SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Thank you, Steve. That anyone -- much less a freakin' PhD in a scientific field would actually think that medicine -- in this country -- had no alternatives for treatment of a respiratory infection??? It is just so freakin' maddening, I can't stand it. Utter absurdity -- stated as if it were fact. Pisses me off so badly...

Steve's avatar

I agree. 100%. They all chase dollars. It used to be, like the book title - Do What You Love And The Money Will Follow - there are very few people who follow that guidance today. Peace.

Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

Typos?

A very sobering **an** honest delivery on the state of the dsDNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines was delivered to the South Carolina Senate this week...

Many thanks for your continuing much-needed pro bono service.

[However, I find your puss very frightful!]

Ivo Bakota's avatar

This is all well and good but experts in PCR like Debunk The Funk 🤡🪮disagree with the methods and interpretation.

Steve's avatar

I suggest never mentioning idiots like DTF; doing so wastes time and energy that can be directed toward more productive efforts. Peace.

Ivo Bakota's avatar

You’ve got a point, but it’s worth looking at the detractors from time to time to see what they’re up to. Even Phillip Buckhaults thought it can’t be true. So what does he do? Rather than just dismiss the work, he does the analysis and finds the same thing. Nothing like someone that’s skeptical being able to independently reproducing the same results.

https://twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1679293853939974146

Steve's avatar

Great point. Thank you. Buckhaults is walking a tightrope between his conscience and the PREP act shield that he is hiding behind. It sounds like he is a transfection - gene-therapy advocate; definitely a failed, worthless "technology".

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/update-on-chd-lawsuit-challenging

Peace.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Sep 18, 2023
Comment removed
Ivo Bakota's avatar

I pretty sure Kevin got the joke. I was comparing the difference in expertise between Dr Wilson and people that actually know what they're doing.

https://youtu.be/q61OPhZ3eO8?si=i01yoJf9x7jP-Qya

Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

South Carolina Senate Hearing by Dr. Phillip Buckhaults

Hilary Butler's avatar

Hanlon's razor is what you use when the tightrope you are walking on, become razor-wire, and running with the hares and hunting with the hounds is a survival strategy..... pretty much acknowledged by the final comment from the senator at the end.

NatteringNaybob's avatar

Kevin - Not good but excellent work.

When all of these gene therapy dangers were well known for DECADES, and before BILLIONS of injections & PROFIT, where were the necessary Congressional oversight hearings during 2020-2022?

Appeals to the excuses of a contrived "emergency" and ignorance do not apply.

Steve's avatar

Read this post by Sasha Latypova and you will understand the professor's testimony and why there is an inherent dichotomy in his position:

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/update-on-chd-lawsuit-challenging?publication_id=870364&post_id=137105662&isFreemail=false&r=1s5t3k

The Prep Act. Peace.

Steve's avatar

Translation: He's walking a tightrope between his conscious and his PREP act immunity; he's following the narrative. Peace.

Keith.'s avatar

Absolutely outstanding video, told with clarity and compassion

Mark Luersen's avatar

Hanlons razor will not apply if placebos are ever discovered under strict chain of custody.

El Recibo's avatar

Hah! CoC...are you kidding me??

Mark Luersen's avatar

I like to remain hopeful, maybe in Florida?

Kat In The Hat's avatar

Wonder when we will see the tasting of vaxxed people for the DNA damage? Is anyone doing this?

Shifan Ahmed's avatar

Aren't the adenovirus vector based vaccines (Astrazeneca & JnJ) posing the same risk of intergration?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12109211/

Bioanon's avatar

Accurate and impartial, exactly what science needs. Keep up the awesome work

Hilary Butler's avatar

Kevin this study was released today, and is not yet on pubmed

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00366-3/fulltext#

Three things.

1) Maybe you could replicate this AND look for plasmid DNA

1) Perhaps you could suggest that you provide them with the reagents to look for plasmid DNA inside Extracellular vesicles, which is breastmilk's form of LNP.

2) Can you please give us an idea as to what the number crunching here really means. After all, babies drink up to 600 mls a day, which IMO puts these figures on the scant side ???

Quote: "The 1:106 mRNA vaccine dilution is similar to the maximum levels detected in the BM EVs, and the 1:103 dilution (100 ng/mL) represents the maximum possible level detected in the serum of vaccinated women.33 Yeo et al.33 have detected the presence of COVID-19 vaccine mRNA in 20 serum samples collected from lactating mothers who received the vaccine, with maximum levels reaching approximately 70 ng/mL."

I'm not "reassured by this study" ....