13 Comments
founding

Kevin, if you had been on the "vaccine" development team, we wouldn't be having to deal with this debacle. Also, I looked up "Relentless", and your picture popped up.

Thanks so much for all you do.

Expand full comment

Don’t have a clue what you’re talking about but it sounds energetic and focused. Thank you Kevin. You really are a wonderful human being.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your diligence and expertise in this effort. It is so much appreciated.

Expand full comment

Kevin, it’s a great thing you’re investing such a great effort to demonstrate integration events of vaccine material in human cells. No one can match your expertise and motivation, kudos for that. I agree that demonstrating integration of vaccine ingredients is an important goal, but integration of what exactly?. Spike protein gene? Really? What does it have to do with anything? Integration of SV40 promoter or enhancer? What would that achieve? Hyper-nuclear localization of p53? - Well, it doesn’t strike me as a designer signature. - Let’s think about motivation here: the designers of the gene therapy inoculations must have a compelling reason for their deployment on a global scale. Number one in their mind is reducing the human population, Bill Gates has said it multiple times. So let’s think about how that could be achieved. Many have said that reducing fertility (decreased number of births) and increasing mortality (increased number of deaths) would be the strategy. So from a design point of view random integration of stuff (spike protein, SV40 enhancer or plasmid junk) doesn’t strike me as a way to achieve that goal.

Let’s think “cancer”. A simple way to do it is integration of oncogenes (mutated version of proto-oncogenes) downstream of a strong promoter/enhancer such as carried out by retroviruses. Has anybody sequenced vaccine vials for the presence of oncogenes? Possibly not, it’s difficult. Searching for them as integration events in tumor samples would be even more difficult as prior knowledge of their identity to fish with proper baits (primers/tags) would be needed. So going straight into the genome would be a rushed decision. - The most elegant way to cause cancer without integrating anything is by CRISPR-Cas9 as explained in my last comment to your post (https://open.substack.com/pub/anandamide/p/targeted-enrichment-of-vaccine-dna?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web). Detection of Cas9 mRNA in vaccine vials would be a requirement.

Now, let’s think “infertility”. By far, the easiest way would be to deploy contraceptive vaccines aimed at genome integration, tissue expression and immune rejection that would neutralize reproductive hormones, damage gonads (ovary, testes) and cause infertility. Candidate genes to integrate under strong promoter/enhancer would be heterologous versions (non-human species) or chimeric ones of human chorionic gonadotropin (PMID: 28410154), zona pellucida 3 (PMID: 21501280) and GnRH (PMID: 28410124) among others less studied. Again fishing for them in vaccinee’s tissue samples would require prior knowledge of gene identity by sequencing vial ingredients. Because a few of these genes carry post-translational modification such as glycosylation (they’re glycoproteins), cross-reacting antibodies against oligosaccharide moieties might explain adverse autoimmune neurological injuries like Bell’s palsy, Guillain Barre syndrome, Transverse Myelitis, and many other sharing a demyelinating mechanism (that is, under the assumption that reproductive and nervous system share the same oligosaccharide antigens, so autoimmunity in one tissue might affect the other as well). This mechanism might explain menstrual abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes consistent with decreased number of births.

So what I’m saying is that possibly the highest yield strategy is to sequence non-plasmid ingredients of vaccine vials, especially those with long mRNA templates like Cas9, LINE-1 and possibly DNAs templates coding for enhancer/promoter-oncogene sequences among others. Smaller genetic materials such as guide RNAs or Homology Directed Repair sequences for GOF mutations would be harder to identify. Just some thoughts.

Expand full comment
founding
Apr 27·edited Apr 28

The Plandemic was a box of chocolates for global psychopaths. Regardless of your agenda, there was a goody for you.

Expand full comment

All the Great Science has caused death and disease when in bible the Good Samaritan as told by Jesus who told of the Good Samaritan who bandaged the man's wounds and poured oil and wine ON HIS WOUNDS

sounds pretty simple

And in the old testament people lived for a few hundred years without science , seems there has been a huge fraud by the CRIMINALS WHO RUN THE GOVERNMENT AND MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT

Expand full comment

Thank you 😊

Expand full comment

Special K - a tour de force, your ATD is magnificent.

Expand full comment

It would be helpful to have an estimate of the cost and time required for this work, as well as the next steps discussed at the end of the article.

I couldn't afford them, but this would likely be small change for a major drug company or advanced government research agency. Then it would beg the question as to whether the Covid release and vaxx programme were due to intent or incompetence.

Expand full comment

Few remarks, this first: "This happens to be one part of spike that contains a GP120-HIV motif."

I do believe there is some kind of incorporation of HIV swapped domains of the gp160, not only gp120 into the Spike sequence. That fingerprint of the Trp-rich C-terminal domain indicates that, after only analyzing the protein sequences..

It would be interesting to know what is the actual Spike COPY NUMBER on the synthetic mod mRNA code...???

Also, maybe your previous posts touched that topic and I didn't get it, so how exactly the shedding process could lead to the Spike incorporation into the genome of the covid unjabbed??

Thank You Kevin.

Expand full comment

Please excuse if my question be nonsensical but isn't it the case that some viruses integrate into human DNA - and have done so since life began and with unknown and unpredictable consequences, save that we are still here?

If that is the case, then what makes the mRNA jab paricularly dangerous and different?

Expand full comment
founding
Apr 29·edited Apr 29

This will help: Role of viruses in human evolution

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7159740/

Humans evolved (over time) and adapted to viruses that occured in the natural environment. Nature did its thing, and life found a way.

The mRNA jibby jab is not from nature. It was cooked up in a lab by folks who didn't respect, or understand, or care, about the complexities of human biology.

Expand full comment
founding

Also: Transfected plasmid DNA is incorporated into the nucleus via nuclear envelope reformation at telophase

"This study elucidates the mechanism through which transfected DNA enters the nucleus for gene expression."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-03021-8

Expand full comment