Substack is a wonderful advance in journalism but we are going to have to pay close attention to the economic incentives. People need traffic and novelty drives traffic. As a result Pet Theories get defended as if their families livelihoods depend on it.
Thank you. My favorite characteristic in people is humility. I have a difficult time trusting people that are incapable of course correcting after seeing an error. It makes me doubt them even when they offer their opinion on a good meal, let alone on a sequence. Couey is Coo-Coo. I saw that early '23. Thanks to your findings my dad finally agreed to stop getting boosted! So thank you! Now we are busy rebuilding his immune system. I had/have long covid, most days I am 90-95% healed, your explanations, tweets, science helped me develop the best combination of science, drs, supplements, hbot -to get better. Thanks for staying rational. 😀
Wow! Another informative, dynamic post. I appreciate your frankness snd honestly when dealing with issues. Directness is definitely the order of the day. I learned a tremendous amount.
Never watched Scooby Doo, so it's hard to appreciate JJ's "science". But his podcast filled with drama, accusations, and nasty personal attacks was too, too much for me.
Kevin, I think you were the first medical expert I saw talk about this subject way back in late winter/early spring 2020. I couldn't really understand about 1/2 of what you were saying but tried very hard to follow along. Thank you for all your contributions to this important subject.
Good stack Kevin! Thanks. I value your expertise and experience in this area and am always learning from you. I liked Couey’s IC hypothesis as it offered a potential explanation that had a decent fit for what I experienced and observed, especially in the midst of all those focusing on the fraudulent and outright malevolent aspects of the ‘pandemic’ and suggesting that’s all it was. But that was always contingent on understanding the precise mechanisms of how it could work so I appreciate this stack.
Way back when the ugly image of “controlled opposition” first appeared on the scene, I remember tweeting that all the military-industrial complex would need to do to dismantle the MFM is merely suggest the possibility and people’s paranoia and egos would do the rest for them.
Ditto with “grifting”. Those who lost their incomes from standing up all have to find ways to make ends meet somehow, but next to the profits made by pharma and those who sponsor them, it’s spoiling over crumbs.
If only scientists would just stick to doing science as it should be done, complete with acknowledging uncertainties, and leave their personalities at the door, maybe we would all be able to parse the enormous amount of interdisciplinary data on what happened so much easier? But the list of potential ‘if only …’s is endless and humans are human.
All I know is I’m so weary of all the accusations and counter accusations tearing apart all coherence within the movement while the perpetrators busy themselves with the next crisis they intend to visit upon us. Will we be any better prepared this time? I doubt it …
I can't read emotional rants/attacks anymore.... time is too short. So I stick with the more humble who have experience and practice the real science of hypothesize/test/observe/re-test/and never get melded to one position. Thank you!!
In all this science -- any discoveries on how to increase the gene expression for olfactory receptor pathways? I used to love cilantro which is supposed to be a genetic thing. Now, altho I can't taste or smell 99% of things, cilantro tastes horribly like a strong soap. Is the virus capable of altering genes? If it can, what else might it have altered?
Couey really is a fly in the ointment. It is disheartening to see how many people have stepped in his fallacious narrative shite and now can't shake it off their shoes.
Kevin McKernan's long-time boss Eric Lander led the Office of Science and Technology for PotUS Biden, and the request for a 65 billion dollar pandemic preparedness bill that uses mRNA vaccines
Good thing McKernan is showing they work if just cleaned up!
I have had the impression that you are not fond of the medical system. I am curious if you have made a statement in the past that mRNA vax tech would work if cleaned up?
I used to watch JJ's streams, but he always rubbed me the wrong way. He often gave the impression of a "catty" co-worker. I did learn a lot from those streams...i think, but question it now. It seems really bonkers to me that be bases his whole RNA replication fidelity argument on a obscure statement Robert Malone made. Even weirder because he obviously doesn't trust Malone, but somehow thinks he "got him".
Thank you. This was an entertaining read for the evening. Someday I hope we all get to focus on BTC and how to fix the monetary world instead of rehashing sars bat shit.
Substack is not an advance in journalism. It is a permitted ghetto that helps contain dissent in order to stop it from manifesting in places more likely to influence the masses. I'm not saying that it isn't helpful and I greatly appreciate all that I have learned here; however, there is a reason this place is not shut down but youtube videos with similar content are censored in a single minute. Your average person would never read an article of this length, let alone several a day. The influence of substack articles is extremely limited.
Well put together. Very comprehensive and took a while to digest. It has been said elsewhere on your sub-stack, but the jab pushers must just love watching the panda/no-virus/no-contagion/Couey blah blah "critique" internecine conflict.
Who needs "enemies" when the opposition can't respect any other position than there own?... which is of course the jab pusher's position as well. They have a slim advantage in that by and large, they present a united front, and try to shoot any of their own who step out of the narrative lane. But it's the opposition that is making an art form of the so-called conflict of interest game.
I do have a question. You say, "Everyone gets the same dose and with gov mandates it hits ~70% of the people. The vaccine injects 43 Trillion modRNAs/100ug dose. Many repeat this 4 times."
Given that the samples provided to EMA had a huge variational spread - ( was it 800 fold? ) - I've been wondering about the jab "dose" thing and looking at the variables.
For instance, where the end of the needle point landed... in a vein? Also, just as age, comorbidities and host genomics vary in relation to severity of clinical outcome,.. might those same factors also change how much any dose injected goes everywhere, how much was made and whether any integrated ? ....
It might be that the LNPs are a determining factor, in that any dose in LNPs + plasmids etc , low or high, is not a good dose anyway?
But as some data has shown in some countries, around about a third of batches didn't even give the person a sore arm, let alone anything else. So you have to wonder what is really going on with those studies.
I have a experimental proposal. I must insist first that this is a great sentence from your article:
"Biology is smart and our in vitro emulations of it are often stupid."
Let's take a coronavirus from a Pangolin and let's try via animal passage, cell culture, bioinformatics and molecular biology tools, to create a new strain, maybe even more infectious or virulent so it has some Gain of Function. Even better, let's change its tropism so it is capable of infecting bats.
Now let's do some DEFUSE proposal and let's introduce this new strain in bat populations.
I bet you 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 $ that we will never make that strain endemic, not even in a small geographical region, let alone in the worldwide population of bats.
Of course I don't have even a fraction of that huge amount of money but it will be easier for me to acquire that quantity than for any BSL-4 biolab to make that experiment and succeed. Just think about it, seriously. The experiment will never succeed and that tell us a lot about our lab-leak imaginations. At most, it may contaminate, with some traces, the general genomic patterns present in bat populations, creating a signal. A signal that probably will not last very long.
Great post!
Viruses do not exist, birds aren't real, earth is flat: if you are against any of that you are CONTROLLED OPPOSITION to some people!
Thank you. My favorite characteristic in people is humility. I have a difficult time trusting people that are incapable of course correcting after seeing an error. It makes me doubt them even when they offer their opinion on a good meal, let alone on a sequence. Couey is Coo-Coo. I saw that early '23. Thanks to your findings my dad finally agreed to stop getting boosted! So thank you! Now we are busy rebuilding his immune system. I had/have long covid, most days I am 90-95% healed, your explanations, tweets, science helped me develop the best combination of science, drs, supplements, hbot -to get better. Thanks for staying rational. 😀
I’m inclined to consider someone’s theories as a possibility until I’m told that they can’t be questioned. 😎
Wow! Another informative, dynamic post. I appreciate your frankness snd honestly when dealing with issues. Directness is definitely the order of the day. I learned a tremendous amount.
Never watched Scooby Doo, so it's hard to appreciate JJ's "science". But his podcast filled with drama, accusations, and nasty personal attacks was too, too much for me.
Kevin, I think you were the first medical expert I saw talk about this subject way back in late winter/early spring 2020. I couldn't really understand about 1/2 of what you were saying but tried very hard to follow along. Thank you for all your contributions to this important subject.
Thanks for staying in this fight!
Good stack Kevin! Thanks. I value your expertise and experience in this area and am always learning from you. I liked Couey’s IC hypothesis as it offered a potential explanation that had a decent fit for what I experienced and observed, especially in the midst of all those focusing on the fraudulent and outright malevolent aspects of the ‘pandemic’ and suggesting that’s all it was. But that was always contingent on understanding the precise mechanisms of how it could work so I appreciate this stack.
Way back when the ugly image of “controlled opposition” first appeared on the scene, I remember tweeting that all the military-industrial complex would need to do to dismantle the MFM is merely suggest the possibility and people’s paranoia and egos would do the rest for them.
Ditto with “grifting”. Those who lost their incomes from standing up all have to find ways to make ends meet somehow, but next to the profits made by pharma and those who sponsor them, it’s spoiling over crumbs.
If only scientists would just stick to doing science as it should be done, complete with acknowledging uncertainties, and leave their personalities at the door, maybe we would all be able to parse the enormous amount of interdisciplinary data on what happened so much easier? But the list of potential ‘if only …’s is endless and humans are human.
All I know is I’m so weary of all the accusations and counter accusations tearing apart all coherence within the movement while the perpetrators busy themselves with the next crisis they intend to visit upon us. Will we be any better prepared this time? I doubt it …
I can't read emotional rants/attacks anymore.... time is too short. So I stick with the more humble who have experience and practice the real science of hypothesize/test/observe/re-test/and never get melded to one position. Thank you!!
In all this science -- any discoveries on how to increase the gene expression for olfactory receptor pathways? I used to love cilantro which is supposed to be a genetic thing. Now, altho I can't taste or smell 99% of things, cilantro tastes horribly like a strong soap. Is the virus capable of altering genes? If it can, what else might it have altered?
Couey really is a fly in the ointment. It is disheartening to see how many people have stepped in his fallacious narrative shite and now can't shake it off their shoes.
Why not deal more directly with the fraud where it started?
Of course do more to find the poison in the jab.
Why enable the fraud that enabled the jab to continue?
Are you telling me that this timeline is believable?
evidence of premeditated fraud
Nick Hudson
true story of origins and sequences of events covid 2020
12/30/2019 eye doctor in China identifies 1 case atypical pneumonia.
1/5/2020 WHO identifies 44 cases atypical pneumonia unknown etiology out of 8 million people in China.
1/7/2020 WHO declares new SARS like virus caused these 65 atypical pneumonia cases.
1/10/2020 Firm manufacturing first PCR tests for SARS-COV2 is already shipping tests.
1/10/2020 First gene sequence for SARS-COV2 is published on virological.org.
1/12/2020 WHO accepts Drosten's PCR protocol as gold standard for testing for SARS-COV2. A few more gene sequences are published.
1/21/2020 Cormen-Drosten Protocol is submitted, peer reviewed and published 27 hours later in a journal on which Drosten is an editor.
1/23/2020 Chinese study about specific physical symptoms for COVID is published in NEJM
1/28/2020 First study published in NEJM on asymptomatic transmission.
29 days to find a virus and build a pandemic start to finish.
Normally Months to get a gene sequenced and 6 or more months for peer review.
https://rumble.com/v3uge7j-november-8-2023.html
Nick Hudson On Covid And The State of The World
There was also this today:
"Housatonic.Live
@HousatonicLive
·
Jan 26
Kevin McKernan's long-time boss Eric Lander led the Office of Science and Technology for PotUS Biden, and the request for a 65 billion dollar pandemic preparedness bill that uses mRNA vaccines
Good thing McKernan is showing they work if just cleaned up!
https://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1830214/000119312521272240/d231100d425.htm"
I have had the impression that you are not fond of the medical system. I am curious if you have made a statement in the past that mRNA vax tech would work if cleaned up?
I used to watch JJ's streams, but he always rubbed me the wrong way. He often gave the impression of a "catty" co-worker. I did learn a lot from those streams...i think, but question it now. It seems really bonkers to me that be bases his whole RNA replication fidelity argument on a obscure statement Robert Malone made. Even weirder because he obviously doesn't trust Malone, but somehow thinks he "got him".
Thank you. This was an entertaining read for the evening. Someday I hope we all get to focus on BTC and how to fix the monetary world instead of rehashing sars bat shit.
Thank you.
Substack is not an advance in journalism. It is a permitted ghetto that helps contain dissent in order to stop it from manifesting in places more likely to influence the masses. I'm not saying that it isn't helpful and I greatly appreciate all that I have learned here; however, there is a reason this place is not shut down but youtube videos with similar content are censored in a single minute. Your average person would never read an article of this length, let alone several a day. The influence of substack articles is extremely limited.
Well put together. Very comprehensive and took a while to digest. It has been said elsewhere on your sub-stack, but the jab pushers must just love watching the panda/no-virus/no-contagion/Couey blah blah "critique" internecine conflict.
Who needs "enemies" when the opposition can't respect any other position than there own?... which is of course the jab pusher's position as well. They have a slim advantage in that by and large, they present a united front, and try to shoot any of their own who step out of the narrative lane. But it's the opposition that is making an art form of the so-called conflict of interest game.
I do have a question. You say, "Everyone gets the same dose and with gov mandates it hits ~70% of the people. The vaccine injects 43 Trillion modRNAs/100ug dose. Many repeat this 4 times."
Given that the samples provided to EMA had a huge variational spread - ( was it 800 fold? ) - I've been wondering about the jab "dose" thing and looking at the variables.
For instance, where the end of the needle point landed... in a vein? Also, just as age, comorbidities and host genomics vary in relation to severity of clinical outcome,.. might those same factors also change how much any dose injected goes everywhere, how much was made and whether any integrated ? ....
It might be that the LNPs are a determining factor, in that any dose in LNPs + plasmids etc , low or high, is not a good dose anyway?
But as some data has shown in some countries, around about a third of batches didn't even give the person a sore arm, let alone anything else. So you have to wonder what is really going on with those studies.
Hi there again,
I have a experimental proposal. I must insist first that this is a great sentence from your article:
"Biology is smart and our in vitro emulations of it are often stupid."
Let's take a coronavirus from a Pangolin and let's try via animal passage, cell culture, bioinformatics and molecular biology tools, to create a new strain, maybe even more infectious or virulent so it has some Gain of Function. Even better, let's change its tropism so it is capable of infecting bats.
Now let's do some DEFUSE proposal and let's introduce this new strain in bat populations.
I bet you 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 $ that we will never make that strain endemic, not even in a small geographical region, let alone in the worldwide population of bats.
Of course I don't have even a fraction of that huge amount of money but it will be easier for me to acquire that quantity than for any BSL-4 biolab to make that experiment and succeed. Just think about it, seriously. The experiment will never succeed and that tell us a lot about our lab-leak imaginations. At most, it may contaminate, with some traces, the general genomic patterns present in bat populations, creating a signal. A signal that probably will not last very long.