18 Comments

What just discussing the fake standards and protocols of viroLIEgy itself as the central and overarching Necus of fraud ?

It’s overtly a sham science with a worldwide scope of consequences death diseases and untimely enslavement for a cheap lie

Expand full comment

As well you can call electricity, energy, nuclear physics, nanotech etc... fake science because everything in them can be observed only by indirect measures, like in virology.

But like virology, all those sciences can very successfully manipulate and utilize those phenomena. They really work.

The very basic nature of virology and basic sciences remains forever a mystery as long we don't understand most profound things as consciousness, existence and origin of universe. Science answer the question how it works, not what it is. The last belongs to philosophy, which I found nowadays more interesting, after these crazy cv19 happenings.

I guess your disappointment with virology refers to how obvious the some kind of centralized control of basic scientific dogmas has become in all disciplines.

As I understand this blog is resisting just that trend.

Expand full comment

There’s a lot on this including Supreme Court litigation litigation, null experiments and a whole host of basic methodological issues to put it lightly.

It’s not got much to do with indirect measurement, but thanks for giving it some genuine thought at least (sincerely) rather than get emotional like far too many. I’ve heard that used as cursory supporting evidence but only follow the actual core methodological issues. In a nutshell the experiments are not capable of detecting of proving ,per the scientific method, the existence of anything other than they should have failed Research Methods 101 and don’t know what a proper control group is.

If you’d like references let me know. The real mystery is how they got away with it for so long.

You might be stunned just how much benefit of the doubt you’re giving them.😅

Expand full comment

But they told us if i can remember right, that there is no DNA in the Vaccine means 0 zero not 1-5000 Tolerance range. That means any tolerance Or value greater than 0 is not acceptable!

Expand full comment

They also claimed it was the cure for a fictitious pathogen :/ that’s what the pederal governments do: they lie and enslave and exploit goodwill abd trust .

Expand full comment

now they (the public health authorities) have admitted it is there but say the amount is not enough to worry about

Expand full comment

Random frameshift question; How many frameshift mutations does the average human genome contain?

Expand full comment

The EMA standard was based on naked DNA (fragments). These would be broken down pretty quickly, and have a hard time getting into cells. The lipid nanoparticles ensure the 'safe' passage of the genetic code into, potentially, every single nucleated cell in the body.

Expand full comment

No mention of what ssDNA is?

Expand full comment

single stranded DNA

The link to the Japanese substack explains it pretty well.

Expand full comment

And if you don't read Japanese well - or at all - the google translate of the page is (surprisingly IMHO) good.

https://note-com.translate.goog/hiroshi_arakawa/n/nfaac32cf4b48?_x_tr_sl=ja&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp&_x_tr_hist=true

Expand full comment

I use the Brave browser. The translate function is embedded.

Expand full comment

Use deepL much much better than Google.

https://www.deepl.com/en/translator

Expand full comment

From Darvin to Hitler to DNA… what is the so called DNA, isn’t it a Eugenic Framework and what are micro satellites?

Genetic Knowledge and Genetic Reproduction Technologies as New Modes of Governance – are We Witnessing a New Form of Eugenics?

https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/168809

https://exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu/eugenics/2-origins/

https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/publications/2009/darwin-dna/

Biohacking Life

https://de.scribd.com/document/495218754/Biohacking-Principles

https://lucilectrix.wordpress.com/2024/05/08/detecting-microsatellites-in-genome-data-variance-in-definitions-and-bioinformatic-approaches-cause-systematic-bias/

https://lucilectrix.wordpress.com/2024/05/08/msatfinder/

I have extreme doubts about genetics because the beginning and the backers matter.

And this field is full of badapples!

https://julimination.wordpress.com/2024/03/30/the-holocaust-medicine-and-becoming-a-physician-the-crucial-role-of-education/

Expand full comment

Who or what is Darvin?

Expand full comment

I share your worries completely. As I understand it is impossible to stop this.

Expand full comment