Fifth Columnists who deny the existence of Coronavirus also state that PCR tests are meaningless. The author of this article is of course an expert in all things PCR.
Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist do not say PCR tests are meaningless but that they cannot be used as a diagnostic tool, as their inventor has also stated, as well as CDC who no longer approves them as such. This analysis has nothing to do with diagnosing covid.
Kerrylyn, I love Kary B Mullis, he called out BS wherever he saw it. Same with the HIV virus, where he said unless you can show me the proof that it exists, you better make it clear that you are speaking as a person of faith. Brilliant!
In UK every PCR lab used 40+ cycles - no wonder 90%+ were false positives. Travesty!
PCR is an incredibly effective technology for finding a strand of DNA or RNA in an impure sample. If the ratio is properly quantified, it can even be used to determine how much of the original sample consisted of the material in question. The flaws in PCR for diagnostics, pertain more to the black box nature of improper primer production, and the fact that the presence of RNA in mucus does not indicate that individual was "sick", as mucosal membranes are designed to capture and serve as your first barrier against said particles. I'm assuming (haven't read this paper well yet) that once Kevin knew to look for the plasmids after the first tests, he then likely developed or used a PCR to find the exact sequence easier in subsequent vials. So, people who deny the viability of PCR for finding genetic material in a sample, are wrong, and will not be able to use this accurate research to tell their listeners the truth, as they likely won't want to flip flop, or still do not understand the tech in question. Here is the original patent, if you would like to learn how the original design worked (I'm sure it's much different now, but the concept is the same to my knowledge)
Even its nobel prize-winning inventor, Kary Mullis, didn't deny that. The controversy is over whether it's a viable diagnostic tool, which it isn't, again according Mullis.
Pfizer uses E coli Bacteria to manufacture DNA which codes their mRNA which turns Humans into synthetic Spike factories and is transferred by breastfeeding.
Every vile vial is contaminated above regulatory limits.
This is fascinating thank you. Here in Ireland we had an inquest ( post covid vaccine) where CJD 'mad cow disease' was used as a reason not to conduct a full autopsy. What other substances are used to create DNA besides e coli?
"Of course you know there is no Graphene in the shots". Yet itтАЩs specifically mentioned in Pfizer doc. entitled тАЬStructural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a vaccine antigenтАЭ. This doc was released by Pfizer following FOI request. It states on p. 7, para 3.4. entitled тАЬCryo-EM of P2 SтАЭ:
тАЬFor TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 ╬╝L purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide.тАЭ
You unfortunately have fallen for Fifth Column lies. Maria Zeee is one source of that. It is designed to discredit the reputation of everyone, including you, who shares such garbage. It is knowingly and deliberately taken out of context. Carbon = conductive GO is used in TEM to prevent charge building up when the cryo (= cold) sample is bombarded by the high energy electron beam.
You need to stop being arrogant. I have no definitive opinion on this. I am simply quoting a Pfizer document obtained by FOI request. While the paper focuses on use of GO as a technical tool for imaging, it cannot be ruled out, according to S. Latypova, as an ingredient in the injections. I doubt she is the type to share rubbish or discredit others. She also provided input to the work you are discussing here, This is what she has to say about the report I quoted:
"While the Pfizer report is not a direct evidence of GO in jabs, I cannot exclude the possibility that graphene oxide is utilized somewhere in Pfizer/Moderna manufacturing process, perhaps to insulate synthesized spike protein from water/air interface to prevent denaturing." She elaborates further in the rest of the article - https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizer-evidence-of-graphene-oxide
Geoff, OK, I'll bite - but please play nicely; we are all on the same side here and some of us are just doing our best to understand, whilst no one can know everything.
So, what about Dr Andreas Noack and Graphene Hydroxide? And, of course, the obvious - he's now dead! Right after publishing his findings.
PS And Kerrylyn's proof here sounds pretty convincing too.
Noack died of natural causes (his death certificate is available on the web) and produced no evidence of GO in the jabs before he died. Some idiot posted a video that launched the "Razor Blades" in jabs line. There is absolutely no evidence of GO in jab vials. There is a woman who seeks to con people into thinking her very dangerous intravenous injection of EDTA will rid the body of dupes of the imaginary GO. https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Would you mind explaining this please?
What's the link with PCR ?
Fifth Columnists who deny the existence of Coronavirus also state that PCR tests are meaningless. The author of this article is of course an expert in all things PCR.
Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist do not say PCR tests are meaningless but that they cannot be used as a diagnostic tool, as their inventor has also stated, as well as CDC who no longer approves them as such. This analysis has nothing to do with diagnosing covid.
Kerrylyn, I love Kary B Mullis, he called out BS wherever he saw it. Same with the HIV virus, where he said unless you can show me the proof that it exists, you better make it clear that you are speaking as a person of faith. Brilliant!
In UK every PCR lab used 40+ cycles - no wonder 90%+ were false positives. Travesty!
"Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist"
Are idiots
If you say, "SARS CoV 2 has not been proven to exist"
Then you are also saying
"PCRs do not find viable viral genetic material." Which is a lie.
End of story
2nd silly comment
So sorry you find reality to be "silly"
Your ignorance is not my problem. Spout drivel to someone who cares enough to educate you
I don't argue with ignorant fools, take your terrain theory shit elsewhere
Can you not fucking read?
Okay, what's the link between PCR and DNA in vaccines? I'm just arriving at this topic & out of my depth. Thanks
PCR is an incredibly effective technology for finding a strand of DNA or RNA in an impure sample. If the ratio is properly quantified, it can even be used to determine how much of the original sample consisted of the material in question. The flaws in PCR for diagnostics, pertain more to the black box nature of improper primer production, and the fact that the presence of RNA in mucus does not indicate that individual was "sick", as mucosal membranes are designed to capture and serve as your first barrier against said particles. I'm assuming (haven't read this paper well yet) that once Kevin knew to look for the plasmids after the first tests, he then likely developed or used a PCR to find the exact sequence easier in subsequent vials. So, people who deny the viability of PCR for finding genetic material in a sample, are wrong, and will not be able to use this accurate research to tell their listeners the truth, as they likely won't want to flip flop, or still do not understand the tech in question. Here is the original patent, if you would like to learn how the original design worked (I'm sure it's much different now, but the concept is the same to my knowledge)
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/ec/14/bf/0a414f77b2d203/US4683195.pdf
Incredibly helpful for me - thank you. Still have questions but will read more and see how far I get. Appreciate your input!
No-one denies the viability of PCR for finding genetic material in a sample.
Good to know you speak for everyone on the planet
Even its nobel prize-winning inventor, Kary Mullis, didn't deny that. The controversy is over whether it's a viable diagnostic tool, which it isn't, again according Mullis.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Let me put this here for you too, since it's apparently not sticking
"Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist"
Are idiots
If you say, "SARS CoV 2 has not been proven to exist"
Then you are also saying
"PCRs do not find viable viral genetic material." Which is a lie.
End of story
Pfizer uses E coli Bacteria to manufacture DNA which codes their mRNA which turns Humans into synthetic Spike factories and is transferred by breastfeeding.
Every vile vial is contaminated above regulatory limits.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/production-of-the-pfizer-biontech
This is fascinating thank you. Here in Ireland we had an inquest ( post covid vaccine) where CJD 'mad cow disease' was used as a reason not to conduct a full autopsy. What other substances are used to create DNA besides e coli?
https://louiseroseingrave.substack.com/p/family-left-with-questions-after
Synthetic versus natural DNA explained
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_synthesis
Full list of jab ingredients here.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/relative-lethality-of-covid-19-vaccines
you might like
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/infective-prions-deliberately-made
Of course you know there is no Graphene in the jabs
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
"Of course you know there is no Graphene in the shots". Yet itтАЩs specifically mentioned in Pfizer doc. entitled тАЬStructural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a vaccine antigenтАЭ. This doc was released by Pfizer following FOI request. It states on p. 7, para 3.4. entitled тАЬCryo-EM of P2 SтАЭ:
тАЬFor TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 ╬╝L purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide.тАЭ
You can find foied Pfizer dos here: https://icandecide.org/pfizer-documents/
You unfortunately have fallen for Fifth Column lies. Maria Zeee is one source of that. It is designed to discredit the reputation of everyone, including you, who shares such garbage. It is knowingly and deliberately taken out of context. Carbon = conductive GO is used in TEM to prevent charge building up when the cryo (= cold) sample is bombarded by the high energy electron beam.
You need to stop being arrogant. I have no definitive opinion on this. I am simply quoting a Pfizer document obtained by FOI request. While the paper focuses on use of GO as a technical tool for imaging, it cannot be ruled out, according to S. Latypova, as an ingredient in the injections. I doubt she is the type to share rubbish or discredit others. She also provided input to the work you are discussing here, This is what she has to say about the report I quoted:
"While the Pfizer report is not a direct evidence of GO in jabs, I cannot exclude the possibility that graphene oxide is utilized somewhere in Pfizer/Moderna manufacturing process, perhaps to insulate synthesized spike protein from water/air interface to prevent denaturing." She elaborates further in the rest of the article - https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizer-evidence-of-graphene-oxide
Geoff, OK, I'll bite - but please play nicely; we are all on the same side here and some of us are just doing our best to understand, whilst no one can know everything.
So, what about Dr Andreas Noack and Graphene Hydroxide? And, of course, the obvious - he's now dead! Right after publishing his findings.
PS And Kerrylyn's proof here sounds pretty convincing too.
Noack died of natural causes (his death certificate is available on the web) and produced no evidence of GO in the jabs before he died. Some idiot posted a video that launched the "Razor Blades" in jabs line. There is absolutely no evidence of GO in jab vials. There is a woman who seeks to con people into thinking her very dangerous intravenous injection of EDTA will rid the body of dupes of the imaginary GO. https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Thanks so much. Lots of homework for me to get busy with!