IntroductionNepetalactone Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Mar 30, 2023·edited Mar 30, 2023Liked by Anandamide
Today i looked closely at all 57 documents returned under TGA FOI 3471
.. none disclose any quantitative assessment of DNA content
further, I reviewed the initial provisional approval decisions for Pfizer and Moderna, and the later extension of those decision to babies 6 months and up:
the TGA has long recognised the need to perform these simple tests, and lays it out clearly for applicants
.. yet Pfizer and Moderna were given a pass!?!?
here the TGA lays it out:
18.3.5.1 Residual host-cell DNA
The level of cell-derived and plasmid-derived DNA should be not more than 10 ng per purified dose, in accordance with the recommendation from the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (Position statement on the use of tumourigenic cells of human origin for the production of biological and biotechnological medicinal products (CPMP/BWP/1143/00)
.. Pfizer wrote the document in respect of purification testing and handed it to the Belgium authorities, who rubber stamped everything and issued a OCABR certificate the very next day .. that certificate was relied upon for at least one batch by the TGA (FL7649/FOI 3390), as sufficient for not independently testing for DNA contamination
.. thereafter (FOI 3471 in respect of batches FL5333, FK8917, FH3221, FL3560, FE3430) the TGA appears to have not been in receipt of further OCABR certificates from Belgium (or any other country), where they (the TGA) performed all standard tests, but notably, none for DNA contamination
'Dean [10] reported that a region of the SV40 DNA has the unique ability to
transport plasmids from the cytoplasm to the nucleus actively. This region is
called the DTS and it is about 372 bp in length. This sequence was shown to
help in the nuclear import of plasmids in various cell types when protein-free
DNA was microinjected and detected via in situ hybridization. This SV40 region includes the SV40 early and late promoters along with two 72-bp repeat enhancers and the origin of replication. Although this full-length sequence was shown to be as efficient as the whole SV40 genomic DNA in transporting plasmid into the nucleus, a single 72-bp repeat was found to retain most of the nuclear import activity.'
Each dose of Pfizer bivalent vaccine contains 0.03 milligrams of mRNA.
Therefore each dose should contain no more than 10 nanograms of DNA (0.03 x 330).
This is the limit recognised by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), being guided by earlier discussion on the topic by the WHO and EMA, wheer the latter two suggested the limit of not more than 10 nanograms of DNA per dose.
Note, in the WHO study group paper above, though 10 nanograms per dose had been raised, the WHO ultimately decided against setting a DNA limit due to what it saw as evolving testing methods - in short, they appear to have bent to the wishes of pharma to have no limit stated.
A paper by Hess et al (2012) on the issue of residual DNA summarised the situation:
‘.. the safety challenges and almost arbitrary risk-based classification of cell substrates used in the production of human vaccines together with compliance to GCCP (Good Cell Culture Practice) are discussed. Even though there has been tremendous progress in the last few years, reflected mainly by revisions and updates to regulatory guidance documents, there still is still no consensus between regulators nor significant harmonisation of the guidance documents or monographs.’
See: Regulatory, biosafety and safety challenges for novel cells as substrates for human vaccines
But, up to 35% of the total nucleic acids in the Pfizer bivalent vaccine is DNA, meaning 0.0105 milligrams is DNA (0.35 x 0.03), which is equivalent to 10,500 nanograms of DNA per dose.
10,500 nanograms of DNA is over 1,000 x above the acceptable DNA limit, or a 104,900% increase over the acceptable limit.
Each dose of the Moderna bivalent vaccine contains 0.1 milligrams of mRNA.
Therefore each dose should (per ealier suggestions) contain no more than 33 nanograms of DNA (0.1 x 330), despite already being 3 times over the historically accepted Australian limit.
But, up to 35% of the total nucleic acids in the Moderna vaccine is DNA, meaning 0.035 milligrams is DNA (0.35 x 0.1), which is equivalent to 35,000 nanograms of DNA per dose.
35,000 nanograms of DNA is over 3,500 x above the Australian acceptable DNA limit, or a 349,900% increase above the historically accepted Australian limit.
for the Pfizer Monovalent vaccine .. this article
Instead of DNA contamination at or below 330 nanograms of DNA per 1 milligram of mRNA, 5,940-23,100 nanograms of DNA per 1 milligram of mRNA was discovered (18-70 fold higher).
This represents 1,700% up to 6,900% increases above the accepted limit of DNA contamination.
If I were devious and wanted to make a qPCR test that would be less sensitive to DNA <200bp in size, I would make a 250bp-300bp qPCR amplicon. All digested DNA is distribution and 300bp qPCR won't amplify many of the molecules in 200bp size ranges. So when they claim numbers of fp or pg detected, its meaningless for that size requirement without the PCR primers being disclosed.
Actually, they dont do ANY research or risk assessment these days and they are quite upfront about it- they said they approved these things based on the documentation that Pfizer provided them originally and the decisions made by the FDA, as well as the final results of trials to be completed in 2024 and 2027 (although perhaps these will now be abandoned). They have been even quite careful to state that during this entire farce of public health.
Its really quite neat- we unfortunately (but quite logically) don't prosecute on monumental stupidity, and to try and prosecute them for doing exactly what every other regulating body for public health around the world has done in the last 3+ years is, well, unlikely. 😐🤦♀️
It shows TGA are required by law to measure selected properties of Covid19 jabs used in Australia, such as Endotoxin and Bioburden levels in every Lot or Batch.
For Moderna a loophole allows them to skip that and rely on a foreign certificate of Endotoxin content.
Mar 30, 2023·edited Mar 30, 2023Liked by Anandamide
yes 2013 .. it is still listed on the TGA website as the guidance document, as the WHO and EMA position of 10 ng per purified dose (and 200 base pairs limit) still applies, and the TGA expressly state they follow the EMA on this issue
see also this paper setting out the WHO 200 base pair limit:
Yet you need to be aware of Dr. Theresa Deisher's work in the 2010s: all anti-viral vaccines tested had up to 2000% excess DNA (10 ng FDA limit) and she proved they were the major factor behind the exponential rise in Autism and neuro damage related diseases (tics, Asperger, etc.). Check SoundChoice.org for her papers and watch her videos at the bottom of this page:
Also, since the 90s, vaccines have been weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG (please test the vials for human Chorionic Gonadotropin ). This was detected in 30+ countries. I could share lab results.
You surely need to understand the context:
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: they were never for reducing mortality, only for murdering!
Datapoint: Lot FL8095 apparently has some 1300+ adverse event reports in VAERS…including reports of 2 deaths, 3 life threatening illnesses, and 5 disabilities.
That's so sad to know, disgusting what they've allowed to be injected into the public, (disgusting banning safe effective drugs that may have helped treat people too)... These victims are people with families and friends... How many unknown victims of this too? Thanks for researching that batch number, I was wondering how many were hurt by this poison.
My daughter in law has so many health issues, worked in health care, however does not realise to now it was the so called vaccine. She cannot work anymore, only 30 years old. Her uterous has to be removed, plus numerous other problems. I am so sad as she thinks I'm nuts!
About two years ago, I went to a local store (GNC) to try and buy some NAC. They didn't have any on the shelves. The GNC employee told me that the FDA told them to pull NAC from the shelves about 3 months before COVID hit. That in itself tells me that NAC is something that these criminals don't want us taking because it's effective. I went to three other places to try to find it, but had no luck. Thankfully, I was able to find it online.
Note: Arizona Nutritional Supplements is a contract and private label manufacturer of vitamins and supplements.
Company: Best Formulations
Country: United States
Founded: 1984
Acquired By: Sirio Pharma Acquired Date: 2023
Company: Biotics Research
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Note: Family-owned company
Company: BYHEALTH International
Country: China
Founded: 1995
Company: Country Life
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Joint Venture Agreement With: Kikkoman, partly owned by Master Trust Bank of Japan, Japan Trustee Services Bank & Oriental Land Company Joint Venture Agreement Date: 2005
Company: Doctor’s Best
Country: United States
Founded: 1990
Acquired By: sold to North Castle Partners in 2014, acquired by Xiamen Kingdomway Group Co, China
Acquired Date: 2016
Company: FitBiomics
Country: United States
Founded: 2019
Note: founded by George Church, often called the “founding father of genomics,” and Jonathan Scheiman. They are making Nella – a genomics-based probiotic to enhance performance in athletes.
Company: Gaia
Country: United States
Founded: 1987
Acquired By: merger with SALUS Haus, Germany Acquired Date: 2021
Company: Garden of Life
Subsidiary Of: Atrium Innovations, Canada
Country: United States
Founded: 2000
Acquired By: Parent company Atrium Innovations acquired by Nestle Health Science Acquired Date: 2018
Company: GNC
Country: United States
Founded: 1935
Acquired By: Thomas H Lee Investment group, 1989, then sold to Harbin Pharmaceutical Holding Group Co. LLC, China
Acquired Date: 2021
Company: GSK
Country: United Kingdom
Founded: GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd founded in 1924
Note: Here is an A-Z list of GSK brands
Company: Kirkland (Costco)
Country: United States
Founded: 1995
Note: Kirkland products are manufactured by their partners. Each supplement sold under the Kirkland name may have a different manufacturer. Kirkland labeled bottles have a vitamin information hotline to call for more information. Kirkland supplements are made in the United States with ingredients that may be sourced from other countries.
Company: Klean Athlete
Subsidiary Of: Douglas Laboratories, Canada
Country: United States
Founded: 2012
Acquired By: Parent company Douglas Laboratories acquired by Atrium Innovations in 2005, which was acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Life Extension
Country: United States
Founded: 1980
Note: The Life Extension Buyer’s Club is associated with the Life Extension Foundation, which changed its name in 2018 to Biomedical Research & Longevity Society.
Company: Matsun Nutrition
Country: United States
Founded: 1992
Note: Matsun Nutrition offers a Private Label Supplement Program for clients to start private label vitamin and supplement companies. Matsun Nutrition provides manufacturing of the vitamins and supplements.
Company: MegaFood
Subsidiary Of: FoodState, United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1973
Acquired By: Parent company FoodState acquired by Pharmavite, a subsidiary of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Japan
Acquired Date: 2014
Company: Metagenics
Subsidiary Of: Alticor, Inc., United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1983
Acquired By: Gryphon Investors
Acquired Date: 2021
Company: Nature Made
Subsidiary Of: Pharmavite, United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Acquired By: Parent company Pharmavite acquired by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Japan
Acquired Date: 1989
Country: Nature’s Bounty
Subsidiary Of: The Bountiful Company, United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Acquired By: Parent company The Bountiful Company acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2021
Company: New Chapter
Country: United States
Founded: 1982
Acquired By: Procter & Gamble
Acquired Date: 2012
Note: In 2018 the founders of New Chapter left the brand citing “’financial pressures to accelerate profits’ meant they could no longer in good conscience continue to associate themselves with the brand.”
Company: Nordic Naturals
Subsidiary Of: Nordic Pharma, UK, which is a subsidiary of Nordic Group, France
Country: Headquarters in United States, Manufacturing by Nordic Pharma in Norway
Founded: 1995
Company: NOW
Country: United States
Founded: 1968
Note: Privately owned by the Richard Family
Company: Nutranext
Country: United States
Founded: 1986
Acquired By: The Clorox Company (subsidiary of P&G)
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Nutrisystem
Country: United States
Founded: 1972
Acquired By: Kainos Capital in 2020, then merged with Adaptive Health in 2021 under new parent company, Wellful, Inc. in 2021
Acquired Date: 2020
Company: OLLY Nutrition
Country: United States
Founded: 2013
Acquired By: Unilever
Acquired Date: 2019
Company: Pentavite
Country: Australia
Founded: 1940
Acquired By: Roche in 1991, Bayer in 2004, then sold to BYHEALTH, China
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Puravida
Country: Brazil
Founded: 2015
Acquired By: Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2022
Company: Pure Encapsulations
Subsidiary Of: Atrium Innovations, Canada
Country: United States
Founded: 1991
Acquired By: Parent company Atrium Innovations acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: ReNew Life
Country: United States
Founded: 1997
Acquired By: Swander Pace Capital and Triangle Capital in 2008, then acquired by The Clorox Company (subsidiary of P&G)
Acquired Date: 2016
Company: Ritual
Country: United States
Founded: 2016
Partnered With: Whole Foods
Partner Date: 2022
Company: Royal DSM
Country: Netherlands
Founded: 1902
Note: DSM has subsidiaries and equity interests in hundreds of companies all over the world, ranging from biotech companies to nutritional product companies.
Company: Schiff Nutrition
Country: United States
Founded: 1936
Acquired By: Reckitt Benckiser with operations in over 60 countries, and headquarters in the UK, Singapore, Dubai and Amsterdam
Acquired Date: 2012
Company: Seeking Health
Brand Of: Healthy Goods
Country: United States
Founded: 2011
Note: Seeking Health was a product line within Healthy Goods, then launched as a separate online company in 2011. While Healthy Goods was sold in 2012, Seeking Health remained under original ownership.
Company: Solaray, Inc.
Country: United States
Founded: 1973
Acquired By: Nutraceutical International Corp in 1993, then acquired by HGGC private equity firm
Acquired Date: 2017
Company: Source Naturals
Country: United States
Founded: 1982
Owned By: Threshold Enterprises, Ltd., a manufacturer and distributer of over 450 brands
Company: Standard Process
Country: United States
Founded: 1929
Partnership Agreement With: Integria Healthcare, Australia
Partnership Agreement Renewal Date: 2020
Note: Family-owned company
Company: Swanson Health Products
Country: United States
Founded: 1969
Acquired By: Swander Pace Capital
Acquired Date: 2016
Company: The Better Health Co. (TBHC)
Country: New Zealand
Founded: 2008
Acquired By: CDH Investments, China in 2016, then acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2022
Company: The Clorox Company
Country: United States
Founded: 1913
Acquired By: Procter & Gamble
Acquired Date: 1957
Company: Thorne
Country: United States
Founded: 1984
Merged With: Onegevity under new parent company Thorne HealthTech in 2021, whose largest shareholders are Kirin Holdings Co. Ltd, Mitsui & Co., Ltd (a Berkshire Hathaway Co.) and Helsinn Holding S.A.
Note: Onegevity is a “health intelligence company” that leverages artificial intelligence and machine learning for healthcare applications.
Note; one is an Epilepsy patient and on a unique AED (epidiolex) often used for Dravet Syndrome or Lennox Gastaut Syndrome. Often driven by SCN1A variants.
These patients are known to not respond well to vaccination.
Exquisite work; well done. And was it not marvelous that (once they realized that no community pharmacy could afford to buy a cryogenic freezer) the rigorous storage requirements were relaxed and beyond-use dates were magically extended?
Hi Kevin, I'm commenting here in response to one of your replies on twitter (I had to "lose" my twitter log in details about 18 months ago as it was consuming me to the point that it was affecting my relationship with my family, so now i just lurk without the ability to comment and follow a few select accounts including yours and Jikkyleaks/arkmedic to stay in the loop:
Your comment was "We have qPCR primers that can look for Vax mRNA and the vector unique to the shot."
I experienced premature ovarian failure/early menopause at 46. It happened after I'd had an appointment with a dentist who had been freshly jabbed at 9am and then working on my teeth at 11am. I went straight from regular, normal problem free cycles to full blown menopause and never experienced another cycle again after that appointment. There is no family history of this and my mother experienced menopause mid 50's. It could be coincidence and I'm not too phased by it as my family is complete and I'm otherwise healthy, but what I can't get out of my mind is that my two children (male) were in that dental chair directly after me. Is it possible do you think to test for jab mRNA to see if I experienced "shedding" of mRNA/LNP? My kids, husband and I are all 100% unjabbed. The dentist is now "retired" for health reasons, so I don't know which jab she had. I'm in Australia - how would I go about testing?
Also, thanks so much for all the work that you (and so many others) are doing right now and throughout the last few years. You are all superheroes and celebrities in my world. I know the social, academic and employment repercussions that come with this work, as well as how much time goes into the researching and collating this information so a huge thankyou from the bottom of my heart.
Analyze the injected anesthesia! proven to be contaminated with nanocarbon tubes or graphene oxide, what else could there be!
Yet you need to be aware of Dr. Theresa Deisher's work in the 2010s: all anti-viral vaccines tested had up to 2000% excess DNA (10 ng FDA limit) and she proved they were the major factor behind the exponential rise in Autism and neuro damage related diseases (tics, Asperger, etc.). Check SoundChoice.org for her papers and watch her videos at the bottom of this page:
Also, since the 90s, vaccines have been weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG (please test the vials for human Chorionic Gonadotropin ). This was detected in 30+ countries. I could share lab results.
You surely need to understand the context:
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: they were never for reducing mortality, only for murdering!
A quick question for all the clever people.... the negative impact of the jabs has been seen in South Africa. The situation in terms of excess deaths doesn't seem quite so bad here although most people I know have stories of heart attack, stroke and sudden death in their close personal circles. Could this be because of the relatively low jab rate (about 30% if memory serves) or could it be a storage issue? Much was made of cryogenic temperatures being needed to keep the shots from degrading but from what I saw most jab centres used cooler boxes with a bit of ice if they could find it. Does DNA and mRNA degrade easily? Could the population here have been spared a lot of injuries relatively speaking due to being given small amounts of degraded product which were worked out through the body as most toxins are? I know it's difficult to quantify exactly to what extent the body is affected by it all but is their any comfort to be taken in products being injected that are not stored at low temperatures and possibly also past their shelf life ( as they were in SA)? Thanks so much again for publishing what you think and find as it's really opened up a whole new world for many of us in terms of our overall understanding of what we are promised and sold.
I believe I read South Africa injected many versions of cv haxsines like sinovax (inactivated virus type) and mRNAsine. It's population also had with a low 30% vx rate.
Hi. In SA there was a small roll out of the Janssen jabs as many who were on the fence liked the idea of "one and done" and of course were later told that a Pfizer second shot was a good idea. It caused some upsets as mandatory shots were required by many companies and all of a sudden you went from 1 which seemed a little safer to getting a second for no logical reason. My knowledge is derived mostly from what I heard from friends and family who generally had two shots of Pfizer. The Sinovac jabs were only offered as a trial on school going age children.
There was a lot of mistrust amongst the greater population and I've heard of quite a few who had a "contact" who issued certificates without actually jabbing. Might be urban legend but most things can be bought for a price here. The government sets quite an example! We had a lot of press coverage on the need for low temp storage before they launched. Commentary focussed on the cost of this and also how to do it throughout SA as it's a very large country with people dispersed throughout. In addition, our electricity cuts make it a challenge in a lot of towns just to keep the milk fresh!! Jabs were only issued through government clinics or approved contractors. No doctors rooms or hospitals. So queues were often long ( not for too long once the initial rush was over) and vials were kept in cooler boxes. I really do think this helped to an extent with limiting the damage. Personally, I know of a few sudden cancers and family has lost friends to "died suddenly" but these were the people who rushed to the front of the queue early on in the roll out. Anecdotal to be sure ....
Thanks for the feedback from a south African. Yeah I heard Jackie stone at the world council for health meeting last year that South Africa had more injured patients than Zimbabwe. In Seychelles I was told all shot varieties were offered. 2 Seychellious friends took only sinovax. It is unclear to me if sinovax is as harmful as mRNA/dna injections.
Fifth Columnists who deny the existence of Coronavirus also state that PCR tests are meaningless. The author of this article is of course an expert in all things PCR.
Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist do not say PCR tests are meaningless but that they cannot be used as a diagnostic tool, as their inventor has also stated, as well as CDC who no longer approves them as such. This analysis has nothing to do with diagnosing covid.
Kerrylyn, I love Kary B Mullis, he called out BS wherever he saw it. Same with the HIV virus, where he said unless you can show me the proof that it exists, you better make it clear that you are speaking as a person of faith. Brilliant!
In UK every PCR lab used 40+ cycles - no wonder 90%+ were false positives. Travesty!
PCR is an incredibly effective technology for finding a strand of DNA or RNA in an impure sample. If the ratio is properly quantified, it can even be used to determine how much of the original sample consisted of the material in question. The flaws in PCR for diagnostics, pertain more to the black box nature of improper primer production, and the fact that the presence of RNA in mucus does not indicate that individual was "sick", as mucosal membranes are designed to capture and serve as your first barrier against said particles. I'm assuming (haven't read this paper well yet) that once Kevin knew to look for the plasmids after the first tests, he then likely developed or used a PCR to find the exact sequence easier in subsequent vials. So, people who deny the viability of PCR for finding genetic material in a sample, are wrong, and will not be able to use this accurate research to tell their listeners the truth, as they likely won't want to flip flop, or still do not understand the tech in question. Here is the original patent, if you would like to learn how the original design worked (I'm sure it's much different now, but the concept is the same to my knowledge)
Pfizer uses E coli Bacteria to manufacture DNA which codes their mRNA which turns Humans into synthetic Spike factories and is transferred by breastfeeding.
Every vile vial is contaminated above regulatory limits.
This is fascinating thank you. Here in Ireland we had an inquest ( post covid vaccine) where CJD 'mad cow disease' was used as a reason not to conduct a full autopsy. What other substances are used to create DNA besides e coli?
I shudder to even imagine that any of the adverse reactions you have so diligently reported will ever be treated by medicinal products made by the same old people who made the original patented garbage..
Great work again Kevin. The TGA defined limit of 10ng per dose is equivalent to the 1:3000 EMA limit for the 30microgram dose in COMIRNATY.
Document here
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/pm-argpm-guidance-18.pdf
We will need to look at TGA FOI 3471 documents to see if they performed a quantitative assessment of DNA content.
If you take out the vial 3 RNA data as an outlier (SD>1) I get an overall (geometric mean) Ct for the RNA as 13.6 and for the DNA as 20.2...
Giving 94:1 overall RNA:DNA - 30x times the limit.
This is not as bad than the bivalent. I wonder if they just gave up any attempt to purify for the bivalent because they knew nobody cared?
Today i looked closely at all 57 documents returned under TGA FOI 3471
.. none disclose any quantitative assessment of DNA content
further, I reviewed the initial provisional approval decisions for Pfizer and Moderna, and the later extension of those decision to babies 6 months and up:
https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspar/auspar-bnt162b2-mrna-comirnaty
https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspar/auspar-tozinameran-1
https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspar/auspar-spikevax
https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspar/auspar-elasomeran
.. none of those decisions referred to or mentioned any testing for DNA, dsDNA contaminants, or cell-substrate DNA
by contrast
.. this TGA AusPAR for an Influenza vaccine in 2015 tested extensively for DNA contamination from the production process .. just search 'DNA':
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/auspar-inactivated-influenza-virus-vaccine-150824.pdf
.. and, when the EMA considered authorising Nuvaxovid for Covid-19 use, they tested extensively for DNA contamination .. search 'DNA':
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/nuvaxovid-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
the TGA has long recognised the need to perform these simple tests, and lays it out clearly for applicants
.. yet Pfizer and Moderna were given a pass!?!?
here the TGA lays it out:
18.3.5.1 Residual host-cell DNA
The level of cell-derived and plasmid-derived DNA should be not more than 10 ng per purified dose, in accordance with the recommendation from the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (Position statement on the use of tumourigenic cells of human origin for the production of biological and biotechnological medicinal products (CPMP/BWP/1143/00)
source: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/pm-argpm-guidance-18.pdf
I think these are closer to 300ng-900ng for Bivalent Pfizer. 1-3ng/ul and 300ul shots.
Not all of this is fully circular plasmids though. Likely linear or cut in some way. I dont think the regulators care about topology but they should.
on the purification point
Pfizer used tangential flow filtration following proteinase K treatment
'TFF after Proteinase K'
their presentation doc to the TGA spells their manufacturing process at pages 26-30:
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-03-1.pdf
.. they mention 'linearised plasmid DNA', where your data has returned whole cDNA, or coiled DNA, as well .. is having both to be expected?
note what they hint at on page 39:
'Routine testing of some product- or process-related impurities could be excluded through validation of their removal in the commercial process.'
.. as the twitter discussion pointed out:
https://twitter.com/Double_Christ/status/1641920213125062658?s=20
.. Pfizer wrote the document in respect of purification testing and handed it to the Belgium authorities, who rubber stamped everything and issued a OCABR certificate the very next day .. that certificate was relied upon for at least one batch by the TGA (FL7649/FOI 3390), as sufficient for not independently testing for DNA contamination
.. thereafter (FOI 3471 in respect of batches FL5333, FK8917, FH3221, FL3560, FE3430) the TGA appears to have not been in receipt of further OCABR certificates from Belgium (or any other country), where they (the TGA) performed all standard tests, but notably, none for DNA contamination
.. see a couple of the TGA certificates here:
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-3471-46.pdf
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-3471-47.pdf
on the issue of nuclear localisation ..
do we have any clarity on the whether the SV40 contains a NLS?
.. i note this paper:
THE ROLE OF PLASMID CONSTRUCTS CONTAINING THE SV40
DNA NUCLEAR-TARGETING SEQUENCE IN CATIONIC LIPID-
MEDIATED DNA DELIVERY
http://www.cmbl.org.pl/pdf/Vol10_p203.pdf
.. at page 204:
'Dean [10] reported that a region of the SV40 DNA has the unique ability to
transport plasmids from the cytoplasm to the nucleus actively. This region is
called the DTS and it is about 372 bp in length. This sequence was shown to
help in the nuclear import of plasmids in various cell types when protein-free
DNA was microinjected and detected via in situ hybridization. This SV40 region includes the SV40 early and late promoters along with two 72-bp repeat enhancers and the origin of replication. Although this full-length sequence was shown to be as efficient as the whole SV40 genomic DNA in transporting plasmid into the nucleus, a single 72-bp repeat was found to retain most of the nuclear import activity.'
One Pfizer vial has that 72bp repeat in one of the vectors but not the other.
on the issue of contamination limits and how the EMA limit of 330 ng DNA per 1 mg of RNA was arrived at ..
The European Medicine Agency (EMA) has stipulated that DNA should not amount to more than 330 nanograms of DNA per milligram of mRNA.
EMA page 74: Rapporteur Rolling Review critical assessment report
https://mega.nz/file/tQgzBYIS#KZLmkCVKJljv2IotP8hnQNXPhEj-sZYos2mSv8o7fYE
Each dose of Pfizer bivalent vaccine contains 0.03 milligrams of mRNA.
Therefore each dose should contain no more than 10 nanograms of DNA (0.03 x 330).
This is the limit recognised by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), being guided by earlier discussion on the topic by the WHO and EMA, wheer the latter two suggested the limit of not more than 10 nanograms of DNA per dose.
TGA page 11: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/pm-argpm-guidance-18.pdf
WHO page 18: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-study-group-on-cell-substrates-for-production-of-biologicals
EMA page 3 of 4: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/position-statement-use-tumourigenic-cells-human-origin-production-biological-biotechnological_en.pdf
Yang, 2013: Establishing Acceptable Limits of Residual DNA:
https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/3_Establishing_acceptable_limits_of_DNA.pdf
Note, in the WHO study group paper above, though 10 nanograms per dose had been raised, the WHO ultimately decided against setting a DNA limit due to what it saw as evolving testing methods - in short, they appear to have bent to the wishes of pharma to have no limit stated.
A paper by Hess et al (2012) on the issue of residual DNA summarised the situation:
‘.. the safety challenges and almost arbitrary risk-based classification of cell substrates used in the production of human vaccines together with compliance to GCCP (Good Cell Culture Practice) are discussed. Even though there has been tremendous progress in the last few years, reflected mainly by revisions and updates to regulatory guidance documents, there still is still no consensus between regulators nor significant harmonisation of the guidance documents or monographs.’
See: Regulatory, biosafety and safety challenges for novel cells as substrates for human vaccines
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X12001806
returning ..
But, up to 35% of the total nucleic acids in the Pfizer bivalent vaccine is DNA, meaning 0.0105 milligrams is DNA (0.35 x 0.03), which is equivalent to 10,500 nanograms of DNA per dose.
10,500 nanograms of DNA is over 1,000 x above the acceptable DNA limit, or a 104,900% increase over the acceptable limit.
Each dose of the Moderna bivalent vaccine contains 0.1 milligrams of mRNA.
Therefore each dose should (per ealier suggestions) contain no more than 33 nanograms of DNA (0.1 x 330), despite already being 3 times over the historically accepted Australian limit.
But, up to 35% of the total nucleic acids in the Moderna vaccine is DNA, meaning 0.035 milligrams is DNA (0.35 x 0.1), which is equivalent to 35,000 nanograms of DNA per dose.
35,000 nanograms of DNA is over 3,500 x above the Australian acceptable DNA limit, or a 349,900% increase above the historically accepted Australian limit.
for the Pfizer Monovalent vaccine .. this article
Instead of DNA contamination at or below 330 nanograms of DNA per 1 milligram of mRNA, 5,940-23,100 nanograms of DNA per 1 milligram of mRNA was discovered (18-70 fold higher).
This represents 1,700% up to 6,900% increases above the accepted limit of DNA contamination.
This is very helpful material.
Thank you for all the digging you’re doing.
well thank you kevin for all the lab work
.. I am the Australian lawyer I believe Jikky passed my details to you
we have corresponded .. I am waiting for a further reply, hopefully
email subject: Contact
If I were devious and wanted to make a qPCR test that would be less sensitive to DNA <200bp in size, I would make a 250bp-300bp qPCR amplicon. All digested DNA is distribution and 300bp qPCR won't amplify many of the molecules in 200bp size ranges. So when they claim numbers of fp or pg detected, its meaningless for that size requirement without the PCR primers being disclosed.
That is some work Jules thank you for taking that load. I hope Kevin sees it
First data from TGA on Endotoxin, residual DNA, dsRNA, and Bioburden comes from Lot 7649. It was found by ROS in page 8 of FOI 3390-11
https://twitter.com/RefugeOfSinner5/status/1641658266471243776/photo/1
The TGA do not do any of their own alleged high standards of research and risk assessment.
They wait until someone else does it.
Then pass it off as their own.
Actually, they dont do ANY research or risk assessment these days and they are quite upfront about it- they said they approved these things based on the documentation that Pfizer provided them originally and the decisions made by the FDA, as well as the final results of trials to be completed in 2024 and 2027 (although perhaps these will now be abandoned). They have been even quite careful to state that during this entire farce of public health.
Its really quite neat- we unfortunately (but quite logically) don't prosecute on monumental stupidity, and to try and prosecute them for doing exactly what every other regulating body for public health around the world has done in the last 3+ years is, well, unlikely. 😐🤦♀️
Nobody cares and less steps=more profit
But the TGA is a 2013 document. How would that be relevant?
It shows TGA are required by law to measure selected properties of Covid19 jabs used in Australia, such as Endotoxin and Bioburden levels in every Lot or Batch.
For Moderna a loophole allows them to skip that and rely on a foreign certificate of Endotoxin content.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/extreme-toxicity-of-endotoxins-in
yes 2013 .. it is still listed on the TGA website as the guidance document, as the WHO and EMA position of 10 ng per purified dose (and 200 base pairs limit) still applies, and the TGA expressly state they follow the EMA on this issue
see also this paper setting out the WHO 200 base pair limit:
https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/3_Establishing_acceptable_limits_of_DNA.pdf
Thanks God for all the good things you do!
Yet you need to be aware of Dr. Theresa Deisher's work in the 2010s: all anti-viral vaccines tested had up to 2000% excess DNA (10 ng FDA limit) and she proved they were the major factor behind the exponential rise in Autism and neuro damage related diseases (tics, Asperger, etc.). Check SoundChoice.org for her papers and watch her videos at the bottom of this page:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
Also, since the 90s, vaccines have been weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG (please test the vials for human Chorionic Gonadotropin ). This was detected in 30+ countries. I could share lab results.
You surely need to understand the context:
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: they were never for reducing mortality, only for murdering!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth
Finally, The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
I could send you Deisher's phone or call her directly from SoundChoice's data.
Blessings for you all!
Prof. Fred Nazar
"RJ" LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
😐😐🤨😑🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
WHY and HOW are these frankensteinian concoctions still on the market and being used?!
Governments everywhere have never before engaged in anything so criminally insane as mandating these poisons.
It's been happening for years just not so in your face
Still on the market because they're working as intended.
Datapoint: Lot FL8095 apparently has some 1300+ adverse event reports in VAERS…including reports of 2 deaths, 3 life threatening illnesses, and 5 disabilities.
That's so sad to know, disgusting what they've allowed to be injected into the public, (disgusting banning safe effective drugs that may have helped treat people too)... These victims are people with families and friends... How many unknown victims of this too? Thanks for researching that batch number, I was wondering how many were hurt by this poison.
I remember reading (somewhere) that E and F series both were considered “hot lots” re SAE’s. Can’t find the reference tho, sorry
My daughter in law has so many health issues, worked in health care, however does not realise to now it was the so called vaccine. She cannot work anymore, only 30 years old. Her uterous has to be removed, plus numerous other problems. I am so sad as she thinks I'm nuts!
More detail on this from Sasha:
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-ballistics-report-is-in-pfizer
Thank you for stating batch number. All prior studies done by others should have stated both manufacturer and batch number.
This lot contains Tromethamine instead of the original Phosphate buffer.
I wish I understood the scientific side of this a little better. I also wish I hadn't taken the moderna vaccine. Too late now though.
See Dr. Peter McCullough's substack on NAC.
About two years ago, I went to a local store (GNC) to try and buy some NAC. They didn't have any on the shelves. The GNC employee told me that the FDA told them to pull NAC from the shelves about 3 months before COVID hit. That in itself tells me that NAC is something that these criminals don't want us taking because it's effective. I went to three other places to try to find it, but had no luck. Thankfully, I was able to find it online.
So who owns GNC? If China owns GNC, I don't China cares that people are healthy.
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/major-acquisitions-changes-in-booming-dietary-supplement-industry-do-you-know-who-is-behind-your-vitamins/
Company: Atrium Innovations
Country: Canada
Founded: 1999
Acquired By: Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Arizona Nutritional Supplements
Country: United States
Founded: 1996
Acquired By: Endeavour Capital
Acquired Date: 2013
Note: Arizona Nutritional Supplements is a contract and private label manufacturer of vitamins and supplements.
Company: Best Formulations
Country: United States
Founded: 1984
Acquired By: Sirio Pharma Acquired Date: 2023
Company: Biotics Research
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Note: Family-owned company
Company: BYHEALTH International
Country: China
Founded: 1995
Company: Country Life
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Joint Venture Agreement With: Kikkoman, partly owned by Master Trust Bank of Japan, Japan Trustee Services Bank & Oriental Land Company Joint Venture Agreement Date: 2005
Company: Doctor’s Best
Country: United States
Founded: 1990
Acquired By: sold to North Castle Partners in 2014, acquired by Xiamen Kingdomway Group Co, China
Acquired Date: 2016
Company: FitBiomics
Country: United States
Founded: 2019
Note: founded by George Church, often called the “founding father of genomics,” and Jonathan Scheiman. They are making Nella – a genomics-based probiotic to enhance performance in athletes.
Company: Gaia
Country: United States
Founded: 1987
Acquired By: merger with SALUS Haus, Germany Acquired Date: 2021
Company: Garden of Life
Subsidiary Of: Atrium Innovations, Canada
Country: United States
Founded: 2000
Acquired By: Parent company Atrium Innovations acquired by Nestle Health Science Acquired Date: 2018
Company: GNC
Country: United States
Founded: 1935
Acquired By: Thomas H Lee Investment group, 1989, then sold to Harbin Pharmaceutical Holding Group Co. LLC, China
Acquired Date: 2021
Company: GSK
Country: United Kingdom
Founded: GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd founded in 1924
Note: Here is an A-Z list of GSK brands
Company: Kirkland (Costco)
Country: United States
Founded: 1995
Note: Kirkland products are manufactured by their partners. Each supplement sold under the Kirkland name may have a different manufacturer. Kirkland labeled bottles have a vitamin information hotline to call for more information. Kirkland supplements are made in the United States with ingredients that may be sourced from other countries.
Company: Klean Athlete
Subsidiary Of: Douglas Laboratories, Canada
Country: United States
Founded: 2012
Acquired By: Parent company Douglas Laboratories acquired by Atrium Innovations in 2005, which was acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Life Extension
Country: United States
Founded: 1980
Note: The Life Extension Buyer’s Club is associated with the Life Extension Foundation, which changed its name in 2018 to Biomedical Research & Longevity Society.
Company: Matsun Nutrition
Country: United States
Founded: 1992
Note: Matsun Nutrition offers a Private Label Supplement Program for clients to start private label vitamin and supplement companies. Matsun Nutrition provides manufacturing of the vitamins and supplements.
Company: MegaFood
Subsidiary Of: FoodState, United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1973
Acquired By: Parent company FoodState acquired by Pharmavite, a subsidiary of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Japan
Acquired Date: 2014
Company: Metagenics
Subsidiary Of: Alticor, Inc., United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1983
Acquired By: Gryphon Investors
Acquired Date: 2021
Company: Nature Made
Subsidiary Of: Pharmavite, United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Acquired By: Parent company Pharmavite acquired by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Japan
Acquired Date: 1989
Country: Nature’s Bounty
Subsidiary Of: The Bountiful Company, United States
Country: United States
Founded: 1971
Acquired By: Parent company The Bountiful Company acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2021
Company: New Chapter
Country: United States
Founded: 1982
Acquired By: Procter & Gamble
Acquired Date: 2012
Note: In 2018 the founders of New Chapter left the brand citing “’financial pressures to accelerate profits’ meant they could no longer in good conscience continue to associate themselves with the brand.”
Company: Nordic Naturals
Subsidiary Of: Nordic Pharma, UK, which is a subsidiary of Nordic Group, France
Country: Headquarters in United States, Manufacturing by Nordic Pharma in Norway
Founded: 1995
Company: NOW
Country: United States
Founded: 1968
Note: Privately owned by the Richard Family
Company: Nutranext
Country: United States
Founded: 1986
Acquired By: The Clorox Company (subsidiary of P&G)
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Nutrisystem
Country: United States
Founded: 1972
Acquired By: Kainos Capital in 2020, then merged with Adaptive Health in 2021 under new parent company, Wellful, Inc. in 2021
Acquired Date: 2020
Company: OLLY Nutrition
Country: United States
Founded: 2013
Acquired By: Unilever
Acquired Date: 2019
Company: Pentavite
Country: Australia
Founded: 1940
Acquired By: Roche in 1991, Bayer in 2004, then sold to BYHEALTH, China
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: Puravida
Country: Brazil
Founded: 2015
Acquired By: Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2022
Company: Pure Encapsulations
Subsidiary Of: Atrium Innovations, Canada
Country: United States
Founded: 1991
Acquired By: Parent company Atrium Innovations acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2018
Company: ReNew Life
Country: United States
Founded: 1997
Acquired By: Swander Pace Capital and Triangle Capital in 2008, then acquired by The Clorox Company (subsidiary of P&G)
Acquired Date: 2016
Company: Ritual
Country: United States
Founded: 2016
Partnered With: Whole Foods
Partner Date: 2022
Company: Royal DSM
Country: Netherlands
Founded: 1902
Note: DSM has subsidiaries and equity interests in hundreds of companies all over the world, ranging from biotech companies to nutritional product companies.
Company: Schiff Nutrition
Country: United States
Founded: 1936
Acquired By: Reckitt Benckiser with operations in over 60 countries, and headquarters in the UK, Singapore, Dubai and Amsterdam
Acquired Date: 2012
Company: Seeking Health
Brand Of: Healthy Goods
Country: United States
Founded: 2011
Note: Seeking Health was a product line within Healthy Goods, then launched as a separate online company in 2011. While Healthy Goods was sold in 2012, Seeking Health remained under original ownership.
Company: Solaray, Inc.
Country: United States
Founded: 1973
Acquired By: Nutraceutical International Corp in 1993, then acquired by HGGC private equity firm
Acquired Date: 2017
Company: Source Naturals
Country: United States
Founded: 1982
Owned By: Threshold Enterprises, Ltd., a manufacturer and distributer of over 450 brands
Company: Standard Process
Country: United States
Founded: 1929
Partnership Agreement With: Integria Healthcare, Australia
Partnership Agreement Renewal Date: 2020
Note: Family-owned company
Company: Swanson Health Products
Country: United States
Founded: 1969
Acquired By: Swander Pace Capital
Acquired Date: 2016
Company: The Better Health Co. (TBHC)
Country: New Zealand
Founded: 2008
Acquired By: CDH Investments, China in 2016, then acquired by Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2022
Company: The Clorox Company
Country: United States
Founded: 1913
Acquired By: Procter & Gamble
Acquired Date: 1957
Company: Thorne
Country: United States
Founded: 1984
Merged With: Onegevity under new parent company Thorne HealthTech in 2021, whose largest shareholders are Kirin Holdings Co. Ltd, Mitsui & Co., Ltd (a Berkshire Hathaway Co.) and Helsinn Holding S.A.
Note: Onegevity is a “health intelligence company” that leverages artificial intelligence and machine learning for healthcare applications.
Company: Vital Proteins
Country: United States
Founded: 2013
Acquired By: Nestle Health Science
Acquired Date: 2020
Company: Zarbee’s, Inc.
Country: United States
Founded: 2008
Acquired By: Johnson & Johnson
Acquired Date: 2018
It's available now.
Try Vitacost--they have several options.
NAC works, as well as anything that increases glutathione levels. NAC + quercetine is a great start.
Fatalities from this lot.
Note; one is an Epilepsy patient and on a unique AED (epidiolex) often used for Dravet Syndrome or Lennox Gastaut Syndrome. Often driven by SCN1A variants.
These patients are known to not respond well to vaccination.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755124/
Never trade personalized medicine for herd medicine.
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/dna-contamination-in-8-vials-of-pfizer
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/the-ballistics-report-is-in-pfizer?utm_source=direct&r=jhcie&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Exquisite work; well done. And was it not marvelous that (once they realized that no community pharmacy could afford to buy a cryogenic freezer) the rigorous storage requirements were relaxed and beyond-use dates were magically extended?
Hi Kevin, I'm commenting here in response to one of your replies on twitter (I had to "lose" my twitter log in details about 18 months ago as it was consuming me to the point that it was affecting my relationship with my family, so now i just lurk without the ability to comment and follow a few select accounts including yours and Jikkyleaks/arkmedic to stay in the loop:
Your comment was "We have qPCR primers that can look for Vax mRNA and the vector unique to the shot."
I experienced premature ovarian failure/early menopause at 46. It happened after I'd had an appointment with a dentist who had been freshly jabbed at 9am and then working on my teeth at 11am. I went straight from regular, normal problem free cycles to full blown menopause and never experienced another cycle again after that appointment. There is no family history of this and my mother experienced menopause mid 50's. It could be coincidence and I'm not too phased by it as my family is complete and I'm otherwise healthy, but what I can't get out of my mind is that my two children (male) were in that dental chair directly after me. Is it possible do you think to test for jab mRNA to see if I experienced "shedding" of mRNA/LNP? My kids, husband and I are all 100% unjabbed. The dentist is now "retired" for health reasons, so I don't know which jab she had. I'm in Australia - how would I go about testing?
Also, thanks so much for all the work that you (and so many others) are doing right now and throughout the last few years. You are all superheroes and celebrities in my world. I know the social, academic and employment repercussions that come with this work, as well as how much time goes into the researching and collating this information so a huge thankyou from the bottom of my heart.
Analyze the injected anesthesia! proven to be contaminated with nanocarbon tubes or graphene oxide, what else could there be!
Yet you need to be aware of Dr. Theresa Deisher's work in the 2010s: all anti-viral vaccines tested had up to 2000% excess DNA (10 ng FDA limit) and she proved they were the major factor behind the exponential rise in Autism and neuro damage related diseases (tics, Asperger, etc.). Check SoundChoice.org for her papers and watch her videos at the bottom of this page:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
Also, since the 90s, vaccines have been weaponized to reduce the population by adding hCG (please test the vials for human Chorionic Gonadotropin ). This was detected in 30+ countries. I could share lab results.
You surely need to understand the context:
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: they were never for reducing mortality, only for murdering!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth
Finally, The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Blessings !
so, is it a fair assumption that all lots are contaminated in some way?
A quick question for all the clever people.... the negative impact of the jabs has been seen in South Africa. The situation in terms of excess deaths doesn't seem quite so bad here although most people I know have stories of heart attack, stroke and sudden death in their close personal circles. Could this be because of the relatively low jab rate (about 30% if memory serves) or could it be a storage issue? Much was made of cryogenic temperatures being needed to keep the shots from degrading but from what I saw most jab centres used cooler boxes with a bit of ice if they could find it. Does DNA and mRNA degrade easily? Could the population here have been spared a lot of injuries relatively speaking due to being given small amounts of degraded product which were worked out through the body as most toxins are? I know it's difficult to quantify exactly to what extent the body is affected by it all but is their any comfort to be taken in products being injected that are not stored at low temperatures and possibly also past their shelf life ( as they were in SA)? Thanks so much again for publishing what you think and find as it's really opened up a whole new world for many of us in terms of our overall understanding of what we are promised and sold.
MRNA degrades much more readily than dna
I believe I read South Africa injected many versions of cv haxsines like sinovax (inactivated virus type) and mRNAsine. It's population also had with a low 30% vx rate.
Hi. In SA there was a small roll out of the Janssen jabs as many who were on the fence liked the idea of "one and done" and of course were later told that a Pfizer second shot was a good idea. It caused some upsets as mandatory shots were required by many companies and all of a sudden you went from 1 which seemed a little safer to getting a second for no logical reason. My knowledge is derived mostly from what I heard from friends and family who generally had two shots of Pfizer. The Sinovac jabs were only offered as a trial on school going age children.
There was a lot of mistrust amongst the greater population and I've heard of quite a few who had a "contact" who issued certificates without actually jabbing. Might be urban legend but most things can be bought for a price here. The government sets quite an example! We had a lot of press coverage on the need for low temp storage before they launched. Commentary focussed on the cost of this and also how to do it throughout SA as it's a very large country with people dispersed throughout. In addition, our electricity cuts make it a challenge in a lot of towns just to keep the milk fresh!! Jabs were only issued through government clinics or approved contractors. No doctors rooms or hospitals. So queues were often long ( not for too long once the initial rush was over) and vials were kept in cooler boxes. I really do think this helped to an extent with limiting the damage. Personally, I know of a few sudden cancers and family has lost friends to "died suddenly" but these were the people who rushed to the front of the queue early on in the roll out. Anecdotal to be sure ....
Thanks for the feedback from a south African. Yeah I heard Jackie stone at the world council for health meeting last year that South Africa had more injured patients than Zimbabwe. In Seychelles I was told all shot varieties were offered. 2 Seychellious friends took only sinovax. It is unclear to me if sinovax is as harmful as mRNA/dna injections.
How can one decipher between intentional and unintentional?
Lovely work.
Those who have swallowed the Fifth Column chant that PCR is useless will suffer Cognitive Dissonance.
Would you mind explaining this please?
What's the link with PCR ?
Fifth Columnists who deny the existence of Coronavirus also state that PCR tests are meaningless. The author of this article is of course an expert in all things PCR.
Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist do not say PCR tests are meaningless but that they cannot be used as a diagnostic tool, as their inventor has also stated, as well as CDC who no longer approves them as such. This analysis has nothing to do with diagnosing covid.
Kerrylyn, I love Kary B Mullis, he called out BS wherever he saw it. Same with the HIV virus, where he said unless you can show me the proof that it exists, you better make it clear that you are speaking as a person of faith. Brilliant!
In UK every PCR lab used 40+ cycles - no wonder 90%+ were false positives. Travesty!
"Those who claim SARS-C0V2 has not been proven to exist"
Are idiots
If you say, "SARS CoV 2 has not been proven to exist"
Then you are also saying
"PCRs do not find viable viral genetic material." Which is a lie.
End of story
2nd silly comment
So sorry you find reality to be "silly"
Your ignorance is not my problem. Spout drivel to someone who cares enough to educate you
Okay, what's the link between PCR and DNA in vaccines? I'm just arriving at this topic & out of my depth. Thanks
PCR is an incredibly effective technology for finding a strand of DNA or RNA in an impure sample. If the ratio is properly quantified, it can even be used to determine how much of the original sample consisted of the material in question. The flaws in PCR for diagnostics, pertain more to the black box nature of improper primer production, and the fact that the presence of RNA in mucus does not indicate that individual was "sick", as mucosal membranes are designed to capture and serve as your first barrier against said particles. I'm assuming (haven't read this paper well yet) that once Kevin knew to look for the plasmids after the first tests, he then likely developed or used a PCR to find the exact sequence easier in subsequent vials. So, people who deny the viability of PCR for finding genetic material in a sample, are wrong, and will not be able to use this accurate research to tell their listeners the truth, as they likely won't want to flip flop, or still do not understand the tech in question. Here is the original patent, if you would like to learn how the original design worked (I'm sure it's much different now, but the concept is the same to my knowledge)
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/ec/14/bf/0a414f77b2d203/US4683195.pdf
Incredibly helpful for me - thank you. Still have questions but will read more and see how far I get. Appreciate your input!
No-one denies the viability of PCR for finding genetic material in a sample.
Good to know you speak for everyone on the planet
Pfizer uses E coli Bacteria to manufacture DNA which codes their mRNA which turns Humans into synthetic Spike factories and is transferred by breastfeeding.
Every vile vial is contaminated above regulatory limits.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/production-of-the-pfizer-biontech
This is fascinating thank you. Here in Ireland we had an inquest ( post covid vaccine) where CJD 'mad cow disease' was used as a reason not to conduct a full autopsy. What other substances are used to create DNA besides e coli?
https://louiseroseingrave.substack.com/p/family-left-with-questions-after
Synthetic versus natural DNA explained
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_synthesis
Full list of jab ingredients here.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/relative-lethality-of-covid-19-vaccines
you might like
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/infective-prions-deliberately-made
Of course you know there is no Graphene in the jabs
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Thank you. I'm getting really tired of that. And other chants. Flat eartherism has returned with a vengence.
What are you getting tired of EDA?
But it's safe and effective, right?
As safe as being on an intravenous of glyphosate for a full month.
Kevin, do you have funds to get a trustworthy actual number Endotoxin assay on this lot # FL8095 ?
You have to admire the consistency. 8 for 8.
I shudder to even imagine that any of the adverse reactions you have so diligently reported will ever be treated by medicinal products made by the same old people who made the original patented garbage..