Kevin, as I noted in the article I just posted https://wrestlingwithtruth.substack.com/p/flccc-conference-april-28 Ryan Cole commented on your work and said that he was seeking to replicate your findings. Of course "THEY" will dismiss his work as well, but each additional 'sequence drop' validates what you have done.
I went to your substack and can't find links to Ryan Cole. I commented. I looked through Rumble and Odysee FLCCC Alliance lists and can't find them there either.
I have now linked the Education on Demand page on the FLCCC website that can take you to their conferences, and from there to the various presentations. Thanks for reading & mentioning this. PLEASE share both my summaries and the primary material. The FLCCC is doing GREAT WORK & needs all the support. I am honored to be able to help introduce others to the work of the organization as well as the individual docs who have been down in the trenches.
Any vials straight from Pfizer would be the least trusted of all. Pfizer is quite capable of "cherry picked" vials just for you. Vials from a vaccine station would be the ones that would reflect what is actually going into a recipients arm. The problem with that, is that no vaccination centre would agree, or certify chain of custody.
It has been tried before, and refusal is always the result. You would wonder why they would refuse, given the "faith" they have in them.
Regarding "mitotic" division, it was told to us, that once spike from the ribosome was presented on the cell wall, all cells which make spike would then be destroyed by the immune system. IF... that is true, mitosis would be moot.... and if that isn't true, then it's relevant. So that raises the question as to whether or not cells which make the spike are destroyed by killer T cells.
Interestingly the hcctv link refuses to work. Hopefully they put it up on several platforms.
Genotoxicity refers to the ability of harmful substances to damage genetic information in cells. Being exposed to chemical and biological agents can result in genomic instabilities and/or epigenetic alterations, which translate into a variety of diseases, cancer included.
Cytotoxicity is the degree to which a substance can cause damage to a cell. A substance or process that causes cell damage or death is referred to as cytotoxic, "cyto" meaning cell and "toxic" meaning poison.
Thank you for the courage/integrity of your public stance… just became a paid subscriber. I am terrified for my 2/3 children who took the shots against my advice! My spouse a geneticist/clinical cardiologist took the first 2 shots! So far so good. One must be prepared to see family members suffer the consequences of trusting our corrupted medical institutions & coerced without knowledge of side effects to take theses life altering shots
Anadamide, I'm trying to get my head around this paper, but something feels very off with the assertion that NSl nuclear translocation of S protein spike mRNA only happens in infected airway epithelium. How does this paper sit with you?
I'm concerned about mRNA shot contaminants in donated blood. Re the dsDNA. Upon administration of a shot, is all the dsDNA, which I assume is primarily from the Ecoli, all covered by the LNP? Does it circulate in the blood? For how long? Is the only time the dsDNA exposed is when the LNP binds to a cell membrane? When the cell divides, does any part of the dsDNA then get into the blood stream? Whenever the dsDNA is in the blood stream, is that functional? Is it toxic? Can it break into pieces? What is the lifetime of the pieces? Are the pieces toxic?
Anandamide, you said on crpodcasts that there are lawsuits about this. Are you able to amplify on that? If that is too sensitive even though you said it, please delete.
The WHO has guidance on 10ng per dose. The problem is the c19 vaccines require multiple shots to get to a fully vaccinated dose. Another way to back calculate this is the Pfizer shots have 30ug of RNA so you can have 1/3030 DNA/RNA (330ng/mg = a ratio of 1/3030). So divide 30ug by 3030.. This = 9.9ng. Pretty close to the WHO number. The dsDNA is derived from Plasmid DNA but its unclear if any of this fragmented plasmid DNA is full length and circular DNA. The FDA and the EMA dont care about DNA topology. Their regulations are agnostic to DNA topology. They shouldnt be. Keep in mind these limits were set not anticipating the dsDNA to be packaged into a transfection reagent.
Hi. I know nothing but I believe he means LNP when he says, "transfection reagent". I do not think potent is the correct word. Here's his article showing dsDNA packaged in the LNP:
I believe the important point is more that dsDNA encapsulated in the LNP crosses into cells. The FDA & EMA set limits for contamination assuming the DNA contamination would not be in the LNP and therefore unlikely to cross into the cells.
The Pfizer DNA content per dose is only the same as the WHO guidance? But in your past posts you said they are 100 times higher than the WHO guidance per dose?
So, James, divulge who you are and put your reputation on the line as Kevin has... if you choose to stay anonymous, then you are revealed as a con, a pharma shill... a reprehensible POS.
The Chinese are obviously trying to deflect blame from their own involvement in the creation of the virus..... Baric et al were working WITH Chinese researchers on coronaviruses and it’s entirely possible/probable that the Chinese military was using the technology for their own purposes.
After all, the virus was either released or escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (controlled by the Chinese military).
I’m not saying that the Chinese intentionally released it.
I’m saying that they could have done so. They are NOT our friends.
We simply don’t know yet.
What seems clear to me is that the virus was not as bad as first feared and that the vaccine is much worse than the virus.
And believe it or not, the Chinese were involved with developing and manufacturing the mRNA vaccines.
Check out Fosun Pharma (based in Communist China) the third silent partner with BioNTech and Pfizer. It’s not widely known, but Fosun has been involved with BioNTech from the beginning.
I don’t disagree with you about Fauci and Friends. I just don’t see the Chinese as the victim or scapegoat here.
The Chinese were all too happy to be involved with this research. Not only did they get access to new technologies for peaceful use, but also their military has been trying to develop biological weapons for use against the West for decades.
When EcoHealth and the rest proposed this as a way to avoid Trump limits on GoF research, I’m sure that the Chinese couldn’t believe their luck.
It was under Obama that the GOF research was banned in the US /transferred secretly to Wuhan/funded directly by Fauci/and via cutouts like peter hotez/Barick/eco health.
Wuhan lab was built by French company headed by Bancel now CEO of moderna… all interrelated. Moreover all patents were already filed in US by moderna/Fauci & all their acolytes. This was definitely a US project not a Chinese one.
Kevin, as I noted in the article I just posted https://wrestlingwithtruth.substack.com/p/flccc-conference-april-28 Ryan Cole commented on your work and said that he was seeking to replicate your findings. Of course "THEY" will dismiss his work as well, but each additional 'sequence drop' validates what you have done.
I went to your substack and can't find links to Ryan Cole. I commented. I looked through Rumble and Odysee FLCCC Alliance lists and can't find them there either.
Do you know where they are?
I have now linked the Education on Demand page on the FLCCC website that can take you to their conferences, and from there to the various presentations. Thanks for reading & mentioning this. PLEASE share both my summaries and the primary material. The FLCCC is doing GREAT WORK & needs all the support. I am honored to be able to help introduce others to the work of the organization as well as the individual docs who have been down in the trenches.
Thank you so much.
Any vials straight from Pfizer would be the least trusted of all. Pfizer is quite capable of "cherry picked" vials just for you. Vials from a vaccine station would be the ones that would reflect what is actually going into a recipients arm. The problem with that, is that no vaccination centre would agree, or certify chain of custody.
It has been tried before, and refusal is always the result. You would wonder why they would refuse, given the "faith" they have in them.
Regarding "mitotic" division, it was told to us, that once spike from the ribosome was presented on the cell wall, all cells which make spike would then be destroyed by the immune system. IF... that is true, mitosis would be moot.... and if that isn't true, then it's relevant. So that raises the question as to whether or not cells which make the spike are destroyed by killer T cells.
Interestingly the hcctv link refuses to work. Hopefully they put it up on several platforms.
Genotoxicity refers to the ability of harmful substances to damage genetic information in cells. Being exposed to chemical and biological agents can result in genomic instabilities and/or epigenetic alterations, which translate into a variety of diseases, cancer included.
Cytotoxicity is the degree to which a substance can cause damage to a cell. A substance or process that causes cell damage or death is referred to as cytotoxic, "cyto" meaning cell and "toxic" meaning poison.
Thank you for your amazing work ♥️
Thank you for the courage/integrity of your public stance… just became a paid subscriber. I am terrified for my 2/3 children who took the shots against my advice! My spouse a geneticist/clinical cardiologist took the first 2 shots! So far so good. One must be prepared to see family members suffer the consequences of trusting our corrupted medical institutions & coerced without knowledge of side effects to take theses life altering shots
Anadamide, I'm trying to get my head around this paper, but something feels very off with the assertion that NSl nuclear translocation of S protein spike mRNA only happens in infected airway epithelium. How does this paper sit with you?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36778849/
Anadamide, have you read this?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35627104/
I'm concerned about mRNA shot contaminants in donated blood. Re the dsDNA. Upon administration of a shot, is all the dsDNA, which I assume is primarily from the Ecoli, all covered by the LNP? Does it circulate in the blood? For how long? Is the only time the dsDNA exposed is when the LNP binds to a cell membrane? When the cell divides, does any part of the dsDNA then get into the blood stream? Whenever the dsDNA is in the blood stream, is that functional? Is it toxic? Can it break into pieces? What is the lifetime of the pieces? Are the pieces toxic?
I like your use of the Ferguson as the gold standard unit for measuring large errors in prediction. I hope it catches on. 😀
Anandamide, you said on crpodcasts that there are lawsuits about this. Are you able to amplify on that? If that is too sensitive even though you said it, please delete.
Good Day, Kevin,
First, thanks for your work.
2 questions:
1. About the 1ng/mg to 815ng/mg of DNA/RNA: is that per dose or per vial?
2. I've heard about plasmid DNA. How does that relate to dsDNA?
Thanks.
The WHO has guidance on 10ng per dose. The problem is the c19 vaccines require multiple shots to get to a fully vaccinated dose. Another way to back calculate this is the Pfizer shots have 30ug of RNA so you can have 1/3030 DNA/RNA (330ng/mg = a ratio of 1/3030). So divide 30ug by 3030.. This = 9.9ng. Pretty close to the WHO number. The dsDNA is derived from Plasmid DNA but its unclear if any of this fragmented plasmid DNA is full length and circular DNA. The FDA and the EMA dont care about DNA topology. Their regulations are agnostic to DNA topology. They shouldnt be. Keep in mind these limits were set not anticipating the dsDNA to be packaged into a transfection reagent.
"Keep in mind these limits were set not anticipating the dsDNA to be packaged into a transfection reagent."
By "transfection reagent," you mean the LNP, which increase the potency?
Hi. I know nothing but I believe he means LNP when he says, "transfection reagent". I do not think potent is the correct word. Here's his article showing dsDNA packaged in the LNP:
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/lnp-packaging-of-dsdna
I believe the important point is more that dsDNA encapsulated in the LNP crosses into cells. The FDA & EMA set limits for contamination assuming the DNA contamination would not be in the LNP and therefore unlikely to cross into the cells.
Thanks!
The Pfizer DNA content per dose is only the same as the WHO guidance? But in your past posts you said they are 100 times higher than the WHO guidance per dose?
So, James, divulge who you are and put your reputation on the line as Kevin has... if you choose to stay anonymous, then you are revealed as a con, a pharma shill... a reprehensible POS.
Thanks for the link.
The Chinese are obviously trying to deflect blame from their own involvement in the creation of the virus..... Baric et al were working WITH Chinese researchers on coronaviruses and it’s entirely possible/probable that the Chinese military was using the technology for their own purposes.
After all, the virus was either released or escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (controlled by the Chinese military).
I’m not saying that the Chinese intentionally released it.
I’m saying that they could have done so. They are NOT our friends.
We simply don’t know yet.
What seems clear to me is that the virus was not as bad as first feared and that the vaccine is much worse than the virus.
And believe it or not, the Chinese were involved with developing and manufacturing the mRNA vaccines.
Check out Fosun Pharma (based in Communist China) the third silent partner with BioNTech and Pfizer. It’s not widely known, but Fosun has been involved with BioNTech from the beginning.
I don’t disagree with you about Fauci and Friends. I just don’t see the Chinese as the victim or scapegoat here.
The Chinese were all too happy to be involved with this research. Not only did they get access to new technologies for peaceful use, but also their military has been trying to develop biological weapons for use against the West for decades.
When EcoHealth and the rest proposed this as a way to avoid Trump limits on GoF research, I’m sure that the Chinese couldn’t believe their luck.
It was under Obama that the GOF research was banned in the US /transferred secretly to Wuhan/funded directly by Fauci/and via cutouts like peter hotez/Barick/eco health.
Wuhan lab was built by French company headed by Bancel now CEO of moderna… all interrelated. Moreover all patents were already filed in US by moderna/Fauci & all their acolytes. This was definitely a US project not a Chinese one.
Fabulous link- thanks.