33 Comments
Jul 7, 2023Liked by Anandamide

HOLY CRAP you're AMAZING for this and all your due diligence!!! At least SOMEONE is helping to hold these ass-hats accountable in some way!!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

A very helpful article that makes some things likely more easily understood by those not familiar with the material.

Expand full comment
Jul 7, 2023Liked by Anandamide

Thank you Lord for servants of the underdogs that can’t or won’t be bought off or silenced with grants.

Expand full comment

Thank you for working so diligently to understand what's in the vials.

Expand full comment
Jul 7, 2023Liked by Anandamide

Excellent and important work. Bravo!

Expand full comment

Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn.

"This DNA contamination is important as it is a result of a manufacturing change Pfizer performed after the clinical trial." -- FDA **CANNOT** ignore this. This is about as big of an F'n deal as it gets for pharmaceuticals. Say what you will about Emergency Medical Authorizations and all of that jazz -- if FDA wants to have ANY semblance of authority or credibility to salvage, it is going to NEED to take this seriously.

Expand full comment

So in a nutshell, on top of all the other chemical, biological, and biotech weapons, they went ahead and said;

"We might as well inject them with feces while we're at it. There's GOT to be some way to murder most of them."

It's a miracle we have as many survivors as we do. But then, this is soft-kill, slow-acting in its ideal form. Maybe it will be 5 years before 50% (or more) of the vaxxed are dead.

Expand full comment

This blog post uncovers potentially significant differences in the manufacturing processes of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting the presence of plasmid-derived double-stranded DNA in the vaccines used for mass public distribution, which was not found in the version used for the initial clinical trials.

This highlights the potential discrepancy between the safety and efficacy data gathered from the clinical trials and the actual public distribution.

The findings underscore the need for transparency, stringent process adherence, and continual reassessment in vaccine manufacturing to ensure public health and maintain trust in medical science.

The Two Faces of Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Production: A Comparative Analysis

Exploring the nuances of large-scale vaccine manufacturing processes and their implications on vaccine safety and efficacy

Click for Non-Medium Friend Link - https://richwriter8.medium.com/the-two-faces-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-production-a-comparative-analysis-6aa9c5b19d2a?sk=a3bb98b5548ed47f09ec3c35aa114c26

Medium Member Story Link - https://richwriter8.medium.com/the-two-faces-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-production-a-comparative-analysis-6aa9c5b19d2a

Medium Link - https://medium.com/ai-ink/the-two-faces-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-production-a-comparative-analysis-6aa9c5b19d2a

Expand full comment

Are there any similarly dicey components in the Moderna expression vector plasmid , even if not SV40 - related ?

Is it possible to design much safer plasmids for the manufacturing phase ? I suspect money drives the choice of vector , i.e. higher yield trumps all , safety be damned.

Expand full comment

So with the increasing number of vaccine vials being analyzed worldwide, none were found inert placebos? The recent Danish study seems to suggest almost a third should be.

Expand full comment

One possibility is that all vials contain the mRNA , but only subsets have low, medium, or high levels of dsDNA that leads to higher rates of AEs.

The regulators should be all over this , but I'm not holding my breath.

Expand full comment
Sep 29, 2023·edited Sep 29, 2023

Nobody is legally obligated to do anything at all until IG Hotline reports are filed. It’s fraud, and concealment. The vaccines have to be stopped until further composition testing is done, but reports have to be filed. Has there been a single person file? Probably not, thus, the FDA is only subservient to themselves.

Take 5min and fill out the forms online.

Expand full comment
author

Do you have a link for such forms?

Expand full comment

FDA is under the HHS:

-it can also be done anonymously if desired

https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/

Expand full comment

Kevin, thank you for your work on this.

Please don’t assume this dsDNA is unintentional contamination as opposed to a deliberately included ingredient.

Given overwhelming evidence Covid is a bioweapon operation, this assumption is unhelpful as well as lacking sufficient foundation.

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/in-a-covid-bioweapon-operation-strange

Expand full comment
author

Your list of horrendous things that happened during COVID doesn’t prove intent of a bioweapon. A host of other conflicts and corruption could just as easily explain them. I remain open to this concept but I don’t mix hunches with hard data.

I’ve written about SEB and bioweapon potential before but the easiest way to discredit current work, is to be making unsubstantiated hyperbolic statements about things you can’t know (peoples intentions). So I will not mix my message of hard scientific measurements with hyperbole.

I don’t appreciate you telling me how to explain my work. You’re free to interpret how you wish and I respect your freedom of speech on that topic. You have your own Substack and can explore that there.

Cheers,

https://osf.io/bcsa6/

Expand full comment

True. Hard data needed.

There's this:

Pfizer: Product is a "prototype" developed under an OTA for the DoD.

https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2022/10/2022.04.22-pfizer-motion-to-dismiss.pdf

An OTA is a financing mechanism to shorttrack the development of all kinds of new weapons (incl. bioweapons). https://www.defenseacq.com/ota-contract-vs-far-based-contract/

Excellent work by Katherine Watt

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/transcript-brook-jackson-vs-pfizer

Expand full comment

Not telling you how to explain your work or asking you to use hyperbole or conclude anything about intent, which no scientist would do in technical papers.

Simply pointing out that implying no intent can be misleading.

Expand full comment

What is the current consensus on the approximate amount of dsDNA contamination per jab in picograms in the adult Pfizer jab?

Expand full comment
author

See figure 13 in the preprint.

12ng in a 300ul dose (pediatric).

500ul adult dose is 20ng/dose.

EMA numbers are ratio metric and off by much more (18-70 fold)

Some vials have tested at a qPCR of CT not 15.5 which would 8X the number.

Expand full comment

Thanks very much Kevin.

Expand full comment

DOD knows. Austin knows. The fraud and kill continues. This was a world experiment brought to you by WEF were they ALL go to make plans against humanity. They want us transhuman and will not stop unless humanity stands and says NO MORE! DO NOT COMPLY. Stand with Dr King! Peaceful noncompliance. Save those around you. Sound the alarm to everyone. The WEF, UN, CDC, FDA, etc. plotting against humanity. God is still in control of our world. Not one of us ceded our God DNA to an alien DNA.

Expand full comment

Where do we go from here? What can be done? The trials are invalidated, but the FDA has already signed off them.

Expand full comment