4 Comments
Jul 30, 2022Liked by Anandamide

It has been also happening over in the geosciences for some time. I looked at a paper by someone I used to know -- really boring Quarternary cores samples from Siberia. And when the data veered to looking like it might contradict some aspect of 'climate emergency' or CO2 narrative, the authors suddenly fell all over themselves trying to explain and reasserting their loyalty to 'climate change'. And then there's the hydrology paper that has the apologetic mandatory preamble about the west being in a severe drought with increasing temps, but the paper is about a area in the west that is on trend this century for falling temps and increased precipitation.

Expand full comment

Nasty. But I bet that the second part was what got the paper published and not retracted.

You see that last minute "but all is well" all too often now.

It"s the price thee authors pay while having the foot in their mouth.

Expand full comment

I just don't have the heart. My older sister, a true believer in the gene therapy injections, was diagnosed 3 months ago with an aggressive GI cancer, for which she's in chemo (so-called "best care," at Sloan Kettering). Our family has zero history of GI cancers. She's been mostly very healthy for over 70 years.

Expand full comment
Jul 24, 2022Liked by Anandamide

I have to look in my archive, but i vaguely remember something similar said about whooping cough vaccine.

Expand full comment