Our freezers are full. In attempt to clean house I have noticed a few other vax related material sent to us that the team needs to dispose of. Before they are disposed of, I threw them through their final qPCR. FL0007 was fully consumed making an Oxford Nanopore library. That sequencing has already been
The Jibby Jabs are a threat to human health. No contaminated/adulterated product should be injected into the body, and their continued use is a crime! They should be removed from the market immediately.
This patent says in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION" as follows:
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of delivering pharmaceutical compositions in order to achieve effective protein expression both for therapeutics and bioprocessing applications. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
The problematic patent US10077439B2 this time is the Removal of DNA fragments in mRNA production process as you already know. The inventor of this patent is Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, and he teaches us that the residual DNAs are to be carcinogenic and the qPCR underestimates the residual DNAs.
I would like to highlight the "mRNA Architecture" section as another item to note in this patent. The "mRNA Architecture" section says as follows:
-----
mRNA Architecture
・・・Modified RNA, e.g., RNA transcripts, e.g., mRNA, are disclosed in the following which is incorporated by reference for all purposes: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/791,922, “Modified Polynucleotides for the Production of Biologics and Proteins Associated with Human Disease”, filed Mar. 9, 2013.
-----
The US13/791922 is incorporated into the problematic patent US10077439B2 by reference for all purposes. The patent publication number of the US13/791922 is US2013259924A1.
What does he say in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION"?
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of effecting protein expression. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
Now you can understand that the US2013259924A1 teaches us the same things as those of the above US10898574B2. That is, Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, has known that the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell could be inherited by offspring.
US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2 are both protected as property rights. Stephane Bancel teachs us a lot through the combinatoin of the US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2.
Great intereview, thank you. Two issues I'd love to hear you comment on are 1) the studies which claim the vaccines saved millions of lives, and have thus done much more good than harm, and 2) the prediction of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche that we will almost inevitably see a variant which people who received at least two shots, and were not previously infected, will be more or less defenseless against and thus should be prepared with antiviral agents like ivermectin, if not prophylactically taking them. Moreover, the CIDRAP website is continually reporting on studies which purport to confirm the vaccines are safe and effective, even for six-month olds and pregnant women. And Dr. Osterholm sounds so intelligent and kind, in his podcasts, that it's hard to reconcile his continued recommending of the vaccines with the point of view being expressed by you and your colleagues, which I'm sure he's aware of. I find the whole situation really confusing, I just don't know what to make of it.
What about the links between Moderna and the Dept of Defense? And didn’t Fauci also have a direct interest in Moderna and it’s shares? So not only did the head of Moderna move to a Government position, Moderna was heavily funded with DoD monies and the actual head of the NIH/CDC was monetarily involved with Moderna. In addition, they tried to force the CDC to publish how much money went into the bank accounts of those making decisions in the CDC/NIH, it was then discovered that this information is legally protected -by a previous administration that appeased Fauci’s wishes to keep this information private. So millions could have flowed from Moderna and Pfizer into decision making CDC /NIH bank accounts and we will never know with whom or for how much. That is one piece of legislation that needs to be changed.
The Jibby Jabs are a threat to human health. No contaminated/adulterated product should be injected into the body, and their continued use is a crime! They should be removed from the market immediately.
If Bancel and cohorts can show their faces in public without shame, then they surely are psychopaths.
I provide more interesting information here.
US10898574B2 does not include Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, as the inventor.
US10898574B2
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10898574B2/en
This patent says in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION" as follows:
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of delivering pharmaceutical compositions in order to achieve effective protein expression both for therapeutics and bioprocessing applications. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
The problematic patent US10077439B2 this time is the Removal of DNA fragments in mRNA production process as you already know. The inventor of this patent is Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, and he teaches us that the residual DNAs are to be carcinogenic and the qPCR underestimates the residual DNAs.
US10077439B2
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10077439B2/en
I would like to highlight the "mRNA Architecture" section as another item to note in this patent. The "mRNA Architecture" section says as follows:
-----
mRNA Architecture
・・・Modified RNA, e.g., RNA transcripts, e.g., mRNA, are disclosed in the following which is incorporated by reference for all purposes: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/791,922, “Modified Polynucleotides for the Production of Biologics and Proteins Associated with Human Disease”, filed Mar. 9, 2013.
-----
The US13/791922 is incorporated into the problematic patent US10077439B2 by reference for all purposes. The patent publication number of the US13/791922 is US2013259924A1.
Let’s take a look at the US2013259924A1.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130259924A1/en?oq=US2013259924A1
Who is the inventor of this patent?
It is Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna.
What does he say in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION"?
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of effecting protein expression. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
Now you can understand that the US2013259924A1 teaches us the same things as those of the above US10898574B2. That is, Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, has known that the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell could be inherited by offspring.
US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2 are both protected as property rights. Stephane Bancel teachs us a lot through the combinatoin of the US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2.
Great intereview, thank you. Two issues I'd love to hear you comment on are 1) the studies which claim the vaccines saved millions of lives, and have thus done much more good than harm, and 2) the prediction of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche that we will almost inevitably see a variant which people who received at least two shots, and were not previously infected, will be more or less defenseless against and thus should be prepared with antiviral agents like ivermectin, if not prophylactically taking them. Moreover, the CIDRAP website is continually reporting on studies which purport to confirm the vaccines are safe and effective, even for six-month olds and pregnant women. And Dr. Osterholm sounds so intelligent and kind, in his podcasts, that it's hard to reconcile his continued recommending of the vaccines with the point of view being expressed by you and your colleagues, which I'm sure he's aware of. I find the whole situation really confusing, I just don't know what to make of it.
What about the links between Moderna and the Dept of Defense? And didn’t Fauci also have a direct interest in Moderna and it’s shares? So not only did the head of Moderna move to a Government position, Moderna was heavily funded with DoD monies and the actual head of the NIH/CDC was monetarily involved with Moderna. In addition, they tried to force the CDC to publish how much money went into the bank accounts of those making decisions in the CDC/NIH, it was then discovered that this information is legally protected -by a previous administration that appeased Fauci’s wishes to keep this information private. So millions could have flowed from Moderna and Pfizer into decision making CDC /NIH bank accounts and we will never know with whom or for how much. That is one piece of legislation that needs to be changed.