The Jibby Jabs are a threat to human health. No contaminated/adulterated product should be injected into the body, and their continued use is a crime! They should be removed from the market immediately.
This patent says in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION" as follows:
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of delivering pharmaceutical compositions in order to achieve effective protein expression both for therapeutics and bioprocessing applications. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
The problematic patent US10077439B2 this time is the Removal of DNA fragments in mRNA production process as you already know. The inventor of this patent is Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, and he teaches us that the residual DNAs are to be carcinogenic and the qPCR underestimates the residual DNAs.
I would like to highlight the "mRNA Architecture" section as another item to note in this patent. The "mRNA Architecture" section says as follows:
-----
mRNA Architecture
・・・Modified RNA, e.g., RNA transcripts, e.g., mRNA, are disclosed in the following which is incorporated by reference for all purposes: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/791,922, “Modified Polynucleotides for the Production of Biologics and Proteins Associated with Human Disease”, filed Mar. 9, 2013.
-----
The US13/791922 is incorporated into the problematic patent US10077439B2 by reference for all purposes. The patent publication number of the US13/791922 is US2013259924A1.
What does he say in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION"?
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of effecting protein expression. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
Now you can understand that the US2013259924A1 teaches us the same things as those of the above US10898574B2. That is, Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, has known that the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell could be inherited by offspring.
US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2 are both protected as property rights. Stephane Bancel teachs us a lot through the combinatoin of the US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2.
The "experts" knew. They all knew - And health agencies and regulators were too stupid and too corrupt to do their jobs. A laboratory experiment was foisted upon the world's population, and that's criminal.
Great intereview, thank you. Two issues I'd love to hear you comment on are 1) the studies which claim the vaccines saved millions of lives, and have thus done much more good than harm, and 2) the prediction of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche that we will almost inevitably see a variant which people who received at least two shots, and were not previously infected, will be more or less defenseless against and thus should be prepared with antiviral agents like ivermectin, if not prophylactically taking them. Moreover, the CIDRAP website is continually reporting on studies which purport to confirm the vaccines are safe and effective, even for six-month olds and pregnant women. And Dr. Osterholm sounds so intelligent and kind, in his podcasts, that it's hard to reconcile his continued recommending of the vaccines with the point of view being expressed by you and your colleagues, which I'm sure he's aware of. I find the whole situation really confusing, I just don't know what to make of it.
Jon, remember the wisdom of a past generation: "Everyone has to get up "Fool's Hill". Along the journey are many distractions, such as those you mentioned. Beware of "experts" whose work/life experience is limited to academia and government. There are many sources of information these days. Choose carefully. Choose wisely. Furry hugs.
Thank you, but I'm still having trouble trusting any sources of information right now. I'm almost happy that I have no children or grandchildren as I'd be completely tormented with regard to which doctors to trust in regard to their healthcare. Yes, Dr. Osterholm is only an epidemiologist, but an extremely smart one who has been warning of the inevitability and danger of pandemics for decades, and one who consults regularly with specialists in all the fields of medicine which are relevant to the pandemic response. He's a very humble man, who admits there are a lot of things he and his colleagues don't understand, calling his second interview with Joe Rogan (a few weeks after Rogan's late 2022 interviews with Drs. McCullough and Malone, with all the controversy those caused, which may be why Rogan only asked him softball questions, imo) "the 'I don't know' interview," as he answered many if not most of Rogan's questions that way. Nevertheless he continues to recommend the vaccines and generally refers to doctors who recommend otherwise as misinformation spreaders, while refusing to face them in any kind of public discussion of the science, which is my problem with him and other "mainstream" doctors and scientists.
I like Kevin for being not only obviously super smart but also less evasive, and was very impressed by his video responding to Dr. Wilson, recently, and also the above interview. But I'm not so impressed by the cartoon of Dr. Wilson he posted on X (with Dr. Wilson's head coming out of the ground like a toilet), which kind of argumentation I don't think is appropriate for the current situation. With all things being connected I have to wonder if there's a relationship between the frustration people feel about the healthcare choices they need to make and the wars which have broken out or worsened over the past few years. And meanwhile the "medical freedom" movement almost unanimously (from what I have seen to date) supports authoritarian legislation like Texas Senate Bill 7, which tramples on reasonable freedom of commerce, with some in the movement basing their objection to vaccines, in general, on somewhat dubious religious grounds. I find the whole situation so depressing I have to spend a lot of my time just trying to deal with my negative emotions about it, not to mention the wider practical and philosophical issues we all have to deal with.
What about the links between Moderna and the Dept of Defense? And didn’t Fauci also have a direct interest in Moderna and it’s shares? So not only did the head of Moderna move to a Government position, Moderna was heavily funded with DoD monies and the actual head of the NIH/CDC was monetarily involved with Moderna. In addition, they tried to force the CDC to publish how much money went into the bank accounts of those making decisions in the CDC/NIH, it was then discovered that this information is legally protected -by a previous administration that appeased Fauci’s wishes to keep this information private. So millions could have flowed from Moderna and Pfizer into decision making CDC /NIH bank accounts and we will never know with whom or for how much. That is one piece of legislation that needs to be changed.
The Jibby Jabs are a threat to human health. No contaminated/adulterated product should be injected into the body, and their continued use is a crime! They should be removed from the market immediately.
What a coincidence! Nov 16, 2023 Moderna halts Epstein-Barr mRNA vaccine trial - myocarditis.
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/exclusive-moderna-has-halted-a-trial?r=23cd92&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
If Bancel and cohorts can show their faces in public without shame, then they surely are psychopaths.
I provide more interesting information here.
US10898574B2 does not include Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, as the inventor.
US10898574B2
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10898574B2/en
This patent says in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION" as follows:
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of delivering pharmaceutical compositions in order to achieve effective protein expression both for therapeutics and bioprocessing applications. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
The problematic patent US10077439B2 this time is the Removal of DNA fragments in mRNA production process as you already know. The inventor of this patent is Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, and he teaches us that the residual DNAs are to be carcinogenic and the qPCR underestimates the residual DNAs.
US10077439B2
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10077439B2/en
I would like to highlight the "mRNA Architecture" section as another item to note in this patent. The "mRNA Architecture" section says as follows:
-----
mRNA Architecture
・・・Modified RNA, e.g., RNA transcripts, e.g., mRNA, are disclosed in the following which is incorporated by reference for all purposes: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/791,922, “Modified Polynucleotides for the Production of Biologics and Proteins Associated with Human Disease”, filed Mar. 9, 2013.
-----
The US13/791922 is incorporated into the problematic patent US10077439B2 by reference for all purposes. The patent publication number of the US13/791922 is US2013259924A1.
Let’s take a look at the US2013259924A1.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130259924A1/en?oq=US2013259924A1
Who is the inventor of this patent?
It is Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna.
What does he say in the "BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION"?
-----
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0006] There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of effecting protein expression. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not the heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.・・・
-----
Now you can understand that the US2013259924A1 teaches us the same things as those of the above US10898574B2. That is, Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, has known that the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell could be inherited by offspring.
US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2 are both protected as property rights. Stephane Bancel teachs us a lot through the combinatoin of the US10077439B2 and the US10898574B2.
The "experts" knew. They all knew - And health agencies and regulators were too stupid and too corrupt to do their jobs. A laboratory experiment was foisted upon the world's population, and that's criminal.
Great intereview, thank you. Two issues I'd love to hear you comment on are 1) the studies which claim the vaccines saved millions of lives, and have thus done much more good than harm, and 2) the prediction of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche that we will almost inevitably see a variant which people who received at least two shots, and were not previously infected, will be more or less defenseless against and thus should be prepared with antiviral agents like ivermectin, if not prophylactically taking them. Moreover, the CIDRAP website is continually reporting on studies which purport to confirm the vaccines are safe and effective, even for six-month olds and pregnant women. And Dr. Osterholm sounds so intelligent and kind, in his podcasts, that it's hard to reconcile his continued recommending of the vaccines with the point of view being expressed by you and your colleagues, which I'm sure he's aware of. I find the whole situation really confusing, I just don't know what to make of it.
Jon, remember the wisdom of a past generation: "Everyone has to get up "Fool's Hill". Along the journey are many distractions, such as those you mentioned. Beware of "experts" whose work/life experience is limited to academia and government. There are many sources of information these days. Choose carefully. Choose wisely. Furry hugs.
Thank you, but I'm still having trouble trusting any sources of information right now. I'm almost happy that I have no children or grandchildren as I'd be completely tormented with regard to which doctors to trust in regard to their healthcare. Yes, Dr. Osterholm is only an epidemiologist, but an extremely smart one who has been warning of the inevitability and danger of pandemics for decades, and one who consults regularly with specialists in all the fields of medicine which are relevant to the pandemic response. He's a very humble man, who admits there are a lot of things he and his colleagues don't understand, calling his second interview with Joe Rogan (a few weeks after Rogan's late 2022 interviews with Drs. McCullough and Malone, with all the controversy those caused, which may be why Rogan only asked him softball questions, imo) "the 'I don't know' interview," as he answered many if not most of Rogan's questions that way. Nevertheless he continues to recommend the vaccines and generally refers to doctors who recommend otherwise as misinformation spreaders, while refusing to face them in any kind of public discussion of the science, which is my problem with him and other "mainstream" doctors and scientists.
I like Kevin for being not only obviously super smart but also less evasive, and was very impressed by his video responding to Dr. Wilson, recently, and also the above interview. But I'm not so impressed by the cartoon of Dr. Wilson he posted on X (with Dr. Wilson's head coming out of the ground like a toilet), which kind of argumentation I don't think is appropriate for the current situation. With all things being connected I have to wonder if there's a relationship between the frustration people feel about the healthcare choices they need to make and the wars which have broken out or worsened over the past few years. And meanwhile the "medical freedom" movement almost unanimously (from what I have seen to date) supports authoritarian legislation like Texas Senate Bill 7, which tramples on reasonable freedom of commerce, with some in the movement basing their objection to vaccines, in general, on somewhat dubious religious grounds. I find the whole situation so depressing I have to spend a lot of my time just trying to deal with my negative emotions about it, not to mention the wider practical and philosophical issues we all have to deal with.
Thank you, again, for your response.
What about the links between Moderna and the Dept of Defense? And didn’t Fauci also have a direct interest in Moderna and it’s shares? So not only did the head of Moderna move to a Government position, Moderna was heavily funded with DoD monies and the actual head of the NIH/CDC was monetarily involved with Moderna. In addition, they tried to force the CDC to publish how much money went into the bank accounts of those making decisions in the CDC/NIH, it was then discovered that this information is legally protected -by a previous administration that appeased Fauci’s wishes to keep this information private. So millions could have flowed from Moderna and Pfizer into decision making CDC /NIH bank accounts and we will never know with whom or for how much. That is one piece of legislation that needs to be changed.
NIH Scientists not required to disclose certain monies paid to them- this was covered by Rand Paul with his questioning of Fauci
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/07/qa-on-financial-disclosures-by-government-scientists/