Janssen were the only company to refuse release of their sequence under an FOI request I had made to the UK regulator, MHRA, who stated:
“Janssen had outlined a clear routes to commercial harm that would be encountered if the document in question was to be released, and they also did not waive our duty of confidence”
I have updated my FOI, and linked to this Substack, to get this on official public record.
Interesting to see the inclusion of factor Xa in this non-replicating virus! Why was it put there? For Ad5, factor X was thought to promote infection of epithelial cells, by bridging Ad5 hexon hyper variable region to heparan-sulfate moieties at the cell surface, but this region is not conserved in Ad26! Factor Xa is the active form of factor X, and is a key enzyme in promoting coagulation. It seems so irresponsible to include factor Xa in this vector, and we know thrombosis is involved in a number of vaccine-induced adverse events. Madness!
Lol, I got excited and started tweeting about it, and then I went to look for the exact sequence and did not find factor Xa in there! Not sure why there is that Factor Xa label on the map, but I guess Kevin will explain later when the sun rises in the US
"Figure 2. BLAST of the 33kb contig against NCBI returns a 23,322bp perfect match to Human adenovirus 26."
Well that sounds good in regards to reproducibility and quality, even though I would not use this product on myself by any chance. I do not believe genetic technologies should be used by healthy people and they are the wrong design for a vaccine. Their unpredictability and risk is considerably higher than normal vaccines, you just cannot use them in healthy individuals and you absolutely cannot use them for a mild disease.
Great work helping humanity, thanks! Been seeing lots of discussion on mRNA vaccines in food. Maybe via vaccinated livestock. Dr. Bridle mentioned this being a very bad idea as it might push tolerance through the GI tract. Any thoughts there? The Health Ranger has an interesting business model testing food.
For months I have been looking for a mechanism/construction in the vaccines that clearly proves that the vaccine is contagious/self-spreading. I researched the structure of the “self-spreading rabies vaccine for wild animals” and “self-spreading vaccines for humans” (that was the original plan to achieve “herd immunity”. It is said for self-spreading there is a human CMV -virus (HCMV) absolutely necessary.
The German patents say: “In some versions, a cmv -promoter, sv40-promoter, Epstein-bar-virus-promoter etc. “My guess is that the ingredients vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.
EU PATENT (2016) — FOR ALL VERSIONS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINE VACCINES AGAINST RESPIRATORY VIRUS
can the covid vaccine be modified into a self-spreading vaccine through the properties/function of the cmv-promoter/enhancer???
thousands of people would be happy to receive an answer from you. We are desperately searching for the truth. This is not possible in Germany at the moment. Everyone is corrupt. You can't trust anyone. You are the only one who has proven that cmv-promoters are present in some vaccines. I've been saying this for a long time, but no one believed me. At least i have proof through your sequence-data.
Hey Kevin, do you know is it true that the lipid nanoparticles used in the mRNA shots are cytotoxic that will cause cell deaths with the dosage injected by each shot?
What in the heck would anybody want with the DNA Sequence? Not as though anybody's going to rush out and make a new Ai Nanotechweapon when we can't even get the first one right for MASS MURDER ON A REGULAR SCHEDULE.
OH, know how it can be used...THAT'S THE POINT. Anybody having any real knowledge of the evil within the hearts of humans would NEVER allow such information out into the general public for any reason. Did you grasp the SNIDE statement about the Ai Nanotechweapon and Mass Murder on a Regular Schedule?
Without being adversarial, it’s worth noting that not all uses are nefarious. Bioinformatics isn’t evil, by nature. Many sequences are already known to the people who worked on the development. What do you think the general public is going to do with this?
What did Einstein claim about creating the 'Theory of Relativity'? Oh..."I was aware of the dreadful nature of these...Should the experiments succeed and I could find no way out."
Much discovered by humans has no inherent evil...UNTIL HUMANS MESS WITH IT.
I don’t disagree in the slightest that human hubris has crossed important boundaries repeatedly. A large pile of examples there, and on that you are absolutely correct, imo. This posting of the sequence found is *not* that, however.
The NCBI database already has data on half a million species, with nearly 2.5 billion sequences, all publicly accessible.
It’s important to understand what the sequence represents, and if you do truly understand it, to pause and then ask the reframed question again: what exactly do you think the public is capable of doing with this information?
It shows us exactly what is in the vial. With that type of knowledge, stronger arguments can be made about what may or may not happen when it is injected into you or your children. Also there is no "nanotech". That's why it's good to know the DNA sequence, it's called "verifying what is actually there, like a real scientist" rather than screaming about unproven thoughts
One vial. Other vials contain other ingredients and there's no doubt the Experiment continues concerning several disciplines concurrently...The greatest human experiment in the whole of history. This should never have happened...
All the Jansen vials will likely have this sequence in them. The only way they don't, would be if Jansen altered the vector at some point during production (changing your formula without informing people is also likely criminal). 1 vial is plenty, and with the data, other scientists can use PCRs to verify their vials also contain these sequences.
Probably useless to me or you, looks to me like something a monkey on a 4 key typewriter punched out. But I’m sure it’s very useful to someone that know what it means but doesn’t have access to equipment or skills to do it themselves. There’s probably someone out there saying, “great I wish I had that information sooner. It implies X, Y or Z”
The Malek probes for little cracks of disunity, let us be a smooth surface.
No "Divide et impera".
(We are post-pandorra's box. Have to live with it. Secrecy always harmed more. Only transparency delivers long lasting solutions. Transparency means protection from structural (and normal) corruption WHO/UN down and up. Bu the best possible cheap, available, safe, efficient and transparent interventions we can think of.)
Thank you, Kevin.
Janssen were the only company to refuse release of their sequence under an FOI request I had made to the UK regulator, MHRA, who stated:
“Janssen had outlined a clear routes to commercial harm that would be encountered if the document in question was to be released, and they also did not waive our duty of confidence”
I have updated my FOI, and linked to this Substack, to get this on official public record.
Link to FOI below:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/full_nucleotide_base_sequences_f_2#outgoing-1445151
Why is there a CMV promoter in there instead of the SV40?
It also has a Tet on/off promoter.
Wonder if patients on Doxy do worse on J&J?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3185730/
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/11/2923
The CMV promoter-enhancer is much more powerful than that of SV40 in all cell types I have looked at, by one to two orders of magnitude.
This vector has lots of Open reading frames and is known to localize to the nucleus.
https://www.cell.com/trends/molecular-medicine/fulltext/S1471-4914(22)00103-4
That magical moment when you remember a CMV promoter is repressed by p53 and activated by JNK pathway. Are you about to have an "ah ha" moment yet?
Cancer!
Interesting to see the inclusion of factor Xa in this non-replicating virus! Why was it put there? For Ad5, factor X was thought to promote infection of epithelial cells, by bridging Ad5 hexon hyper variable region to heparan-sulfate moieties at the cell surface, but this region is not conserved in Ad26! Factor Xa is the active form of factor X, and is a key enzyme in promoting coagulation. It seems so irresponsible to include factor Xa in this vector, and we know thrombosis is involved in a number of vaccine-induced adverse events. Madness!
Lol, I got excited and started tweeting about it, and then I went to look for the exact sequence and did not find factor Xa in there! Not sure why there is that Factor Xa label on the map, but I guess Kevin will explain later when the sun rises in the US
SnapGene annotated that.
It looks alike a short peptide matcb.
I’ll dig up the alignment later today.
IEGR is the 4 amino acid cut site.
"Figure 2. BLAST of the 33kb contig against NCBI returns a 23,322bp perfect match to Human adenovirus 26."
Well that sounds good in regards to reproducibility and quality, even though I would not use this product on myself by any chance. I do not believe genetic technologies should be used by healthy people and they are the wrong design for a vaccine. Their unpredictability and risk is considerably higher than normal vaccines, you just cannot use them in healthy individuals and you absolutely cannot use them for a mild disease.
Many nasty details are hidden within these letter combinations . And some can read it to find right that .
Great work helping humanity, thanks! Been seeing lots of discussion on mRNA vaccines in food. Maybe via vaccinated livestock. Dr. Bridle mentioned this being a very bad idea as it might push tolerance through the GI tract. Any thoughts there? The Health Ranger has an interesting business model testing food.
I guess the AstraZeneca Chimp AdV vax is next on the list to be sequenced, right Kevin?
That has already been done.
https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-799338/v1/8c753894-27c0-4f7e-90da-a560b879b378.pdf?c=1631887875
Thank you Kevin for your great work.
I have an important question :
For months I have been looking for a mechanism/construction in the vaccines that clearly proves that the vaccine is contagious/self-spreading. I researched the structure of the “self-spreading rabies vaccine for wild animals” and “self-spreading vaccines for humans” (that was the original plan to achieve “herd immunity”. It is said for self-spreading there is a human CMV -virus (HCMV) absolutely necessary.
CORONAVIRUS VACCINE - DE112021000012T5 (https://patents.google.com/patent/DE112021000012B4/en)
CUREVAC SE
Published: November 18th, 2021
The German patents say: “In some versions, a cmv -promoter, sv40-promoter, Epstein-bar-virus-promoter etc. “My guess is that the ingredients vary from manufacturer to manufacturer.
EU PATENT (2016) — FOR ALL VERSIONS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINE VACCINES AGAINST RESPIRATORY VIRUS
EU PATENT: EP3718565B1 (https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3718565B1/en)
ModernaTx Inc
submitted: October 21, 2016
published: April 27, 2022
my question:
can the covid vaccine be modified into a self-spreading vaccine through the properties/function of the cmv-promoter/enhancer???
thousands of people would be happy to receive an answer from you. We are desperately searching for the truth. This is not possible in Germany at the moment. Everyone is corrupt. You can't trust anyone. You are the only one who has proven that cmv-promoters are present in some vaccines. I've been saying this for a long time, but no one believed me. At least i have proof through your sequence-data.
THANK YOU
God protect you & stay healthy
Best regards
David from Germany
Hey Kevin, do you know is it true that the lipid nanoparticles used in the mRNA shots are cytotoxic that will cause cell deaths with the dosage injected by each shot?
What in the heck would anybody want with the DNA Sequence? Not as though anybody's going to rush out and make a new Ai Nanotechweapon when we can't even get the first one right for MASS MURDER ON A REGULAR SCHEDULE.
Look up Bioinformatics. It might make more sense to you if you understand how this kind of information can be used.
OH, know how it can be used...THAT'S THE POINT. Anybody having any real knowledge of the evil within the hearts of humans would NEVER allow such information out into the general public for any reason. Did you grasp the SNIDE statement about the Ai Nanotechweapon and Mass Murder on a Regular Schedule?
The evil ones have the infornation already. Don't play stupid.
Without being adversarial, it’s worth noting that not all uses are nefarious. Bioinformatics isn’t evil, by nature. Many sequences are already known to the people who worked on the development. What do you think the general public is going to do with this?
What did Einstein claim about creating the 'Theory of Relativity'? Oh..."I was aware of the dreadful nature of these...Should the experiments succeed and I could find no way out."
Much discovered by humans has no inherent evil...UNTIL HUMANS MESS WITH IT.
I don’t disagree in the slightest that human hubris has crossed important boundaries repeatedly. A large pile of examples there, and on that you are absolutely correct, imo. This posting of the sequence found is *not* that, however.
The NCBI database already has data on half a million species, with nearly 2.5 billion sequences, all publicly accessible.
It’s important to understand what the sequence represents, and if you do truly understand it, to pause and then ask the reframed question again: what exactly do you think the public is capable of doing with this information?
Various scientists can input the sequence into their software programs for further analysis, hopefully for ethical research.
Hope is an unmeasurable; thus worthless when applied to humans applying ethics to ANYTHING.
It shows us exactly what is in the vial. With that type of knowledge, stronger arguments can be made about what may or may not happen when it is injected into you or your children. Also there is no "nanotech". That's why it's good to know the DNA sequence, it's called "verifying what is actually there, like a real scientist" rather than screaming about unproven thoughts
One vial. Other vials contain other ingredients and there's no doubt the Experiment continues concerning several disciplines concurrently...The greatest human experiment in the whole of history. This should never have happened...
All the Jansen vials will likely have this sequence in them. The only way they don't, would be if Jansen altered the vector at some point during production (changing your formula without informing people is also likely criminal). 1 vial is plenty, and with the data, other scientists can use PCRs to verify their vials also contain these sequences.
Probably useless to me or you, looks to me like something a monkey on a 4 key typewriter punched out. But I’m sure it’s very useful to someone that know what it means but doesn’t have access to equipment or skills to do it themselves. There’s probably someone out there saying, “great I wish I had that information sooner. It implies X, Y or Z”
Have no doubts about anything you've wrote here. Bet there's many ETHICAL HACKERS out and about trying to design ETHICAL TREATMENTS FOR ILLNESSES.
See above. Jessica Rose is already on the case. Asking questions. I’m sure she appreciates the work that went into this.
The Malek probes for little cracks of disunity, let us be a smooth surface.
No "Divide et impera".
(We are post-pandorra's box. Have to live with it. Secrecy always harmed more. Only transparency delivers long lasting solutions. Transparency means protection from structural (and normal) corruption WHO/UN down and up. Bu the best possible cheap, available, safe, efficient and transparent interventions we can think of.)