59 Comments

Kevin McKernan is mission oriented, and introducing others to the targeted sequencing tools needed to detect low frequency genetic integration events. This is how we will find out what the contaminated mRNA jabs are doing in the bodies of the recipients. (Kevin is what researchers ought to be.)

Sharing is caring.

Expand full comment

Thanks again for sharing you hard work.

Expand full comment

Humanity is holding it's breath finding out if we are now extinct. Are we all transhumans now? Do we all now carry the mark of the beast?

Expand full comment

I'm one of those people who is sensitive to the vaxxed. While I was hopeful and actually even believing that after 2 years, those who got the original round of shots would have cleared this stuff of out fheir bodies by now, I'm sad to say that this is not in fact the case. There appears to be an uptake into the body in a more long-lasting fashion. I'm not a scientist, but I WAS a professional healer, until exposure to the freshly vaxxed put me out of a career (and nearly cost me my life). Of course some people might have received less effective injections than others, or have been more efficient clearers of the mRNA, but by and large, it appears to be sticking and staying, making the human population at large now manufacturers of a deadly blood toxin. Brings a dark new aspect of meaning to the term 'cottage manufacturing.'

Expand full comment

I’m down to know how many people have now been integrated. I’m also interested to see if this has been shed to others who never took the vaccine or any transfusion. Will this be something everyone can do who wants to know? Something they can continue to spot check?

Expand full comment

It must be seen as impossible for viable mRNA to pass between people, sans intimate physical contact. The lipid shells are highly unstable, and naked mRNA would be immediately destroyed by the body.

Expand full comment

I’m speaking more of a viral type shedding from production of spike protein in high amounts through the body. Especially closer to any vaccination.

Expand full comment

Yes, think exosomes.

My wife is quite sensitive to newly or heavily-vaxxed people, without physical contact. Handshakes or hugs are even more noticeable.

Expand full comment

Yes the shedding is still going on, even at over 2 years for those who only got the original shots. I am also a sensitive to the vaxxed. there may be a weirder dimension to this, as I have seen unexplained objects in my blood. So, the spike proteins are real and somewhat understood at this point, but there also might be a dimension of nanobiotech that I'm not yet certain about in terms of what is real. Actually taking a live blood analysis course right now in order to rule out ordinary explanations....

Expand full comment

Our bodies are really really good at neutralising foreign proteins. Have to be, given the untold numbers of different types we've been exposed to during evolution.

It is a numbers game, anyone with a deficient (innate) immune system may get problems. Also, getting a vast amount of spike from multiple (newly) jabbed.

I do not worry, as have been able to avoid prolonged contact with them.

Expand full comment

🤔🤔Hmm. I'm a wind down glass of wine in but curious. 😉

Wasnt part of the awesome, super speccy mRNA technology- to partially help stabilise the LNP with the added "perfectly natural" but magically we made it indestructible pseudouridine, otherwise secret agent style- known as U? Thus making the "highly unstable lipid shells", kinda alot more stable?

Expand full comment

That is only when the mRNA is intracellular. Any mRNA found outside of cells will not last long at all, hence the lnps are necessary to get it into the cells.

Expand full comment

The spike proteins that are being manufactured by the bodies of the vaxxed are 'stabilized'; they don't break down outside of the body the way that spike proteins normally do. They WILL break down eventually, but under duress. This is why enzymes such as Natto kinase Lumbrokinase have become so popular is to help break down the stabilized spike proteins. So the mRNA yes had LNP encapsulation, but then also this mRNA once it got into the cells is making a 2Proline with psuedouridine spike protein that is 'stabilized' and resists breaking down and it appears is getting passed from person to person even like a global game of 'hot potato.' Bodies recognized they are toxic so they shed them out through the skin or breath and then off they go via exosomes into the bodies of someone else via breath or skin. and then again, recogized as toxic and cleared and again on to a new body until finally someone or something breaks it down.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure the prolines will prevent the proteins from being digested by protease etc. They are ubiquitous, and so we'll have had a lot of experience with them. The psuedouridine's main function, to the best of my knowledge, is to stabilise the modified mRNA.

What we can't (easily) break down are misfolded proteins, which are suspected to cause a variety of prion diseases. The proteins made by the mod mRNA have glycine residues (zippers), which make the misfolding much more likely.

Even so, I reckon a *healthy* (innate) immune system will denature them, else keep them at bay until we die of other stuff.

It's likely a numbers game; keep the immune system as healthy as possible, whilst keeping away from the, especially newly, jabbed.

Expand full comment

As you say, this approach looks like a great way to detect plasmid integration events, and your thorough explanation and experience makes you an expert with this tool. However I don’t understand your rationale for testing tumor samples, unless you’re implying that integration of vaccine plasmid DNA might be somehow responsible for tumorigenesis in vaccine recipients. This sentence at the end of the post suggests that meaning “they may offer a much cheaper means to screen tumor samples for vaccine induced integration events.”

You might be aware that if causation of cancer were a goal of the globally mandated inoculations, the right tool would be gene editing with CRISPR-Cas9 to target cancer driver genes without leaving a single trace behind. As many good investigators have attempted to recapitulate the tumorigenic process in animal models, gain-of-function mutation in proto-oncogenes (say, K-ras) accompanied by loss-of-function mutations in tumor suppressor genes (say, p53) would be the most efficient way to achieve that goal. This paper is a good example https://www.cell.com/fulltext/S0092-8674(14)01163-5

Another link to the same article DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.014

Although cancer can be caused by random genome integration (say, retroviral oncogenes), it can be easily detected (say, fishing for LTR elements in vaccine vials).

I wonder if you’ve considered looking for Cas9 (mRNA) sequences in vaccine vials. Thanks

Expand full comment
Apr 7·edited Apr 7

Have you followed Kevin's substack from the start? Yes, the Pfizer vaccine has in it, the plasmid, which has four SV40 sequences in it, known to promote oncogenesis, which could = "vaccine induced integration events". From the start of his testing Pfizer vials those SV40 sequences are one of his concerns because the SV40 sequences in the vaccine, are the perfect integrators. The question that has to be answered is whether it gets into the DNA and starts to orchestrate tumorigenesis. I presume this is one tool which may answer that question.

Expand full comment

That's not what he said. You might want to rereview that material. In fact he has clearly stated something quite a bit more nuanced. foreign DNA is oncogenic; the SV40 promoter is not necessarily the root cause of the cancer risks

Expand full comment

I've read every substack Kevin has written on the mRNA gene sequencing, and he has expressed concern re SV40 sequences, not just in his substacks, but also in interviews, - - - and I've watched all those as well. He also pointed out that there was an AmpR promotor in front of Kan, therefore there was no need to use SV40 at all. So maybe I have missed something?

To help me out, can you summarise your reasoning for saying that Kevin didn't say that the SV40 sequences could be part of vaccine induced oncogenesis please?

Expand full comment

The concern, from my understanding, is that an SV-40 promoter was used at all, considering the terrible pedigree of SV-40 derived from SIV which seemingly evolved into HIV. So SV-40 comes other concerns, not cancer. there's a dark history with SV-40...Mikovits has documented it in her trilogy. McKearnan has said repeatedly in interviews that the DNA contamination itself does not guarantee cancer; it just can increase the risk. Personally, I see a much bigger risk with foreign DNA contamination, as Luc Montagnier warned about before he passed away. I'm sure everyone is aware of it and treading carefully.

Expand full comment

Hi Segfish,

I don't know what Judy Mikovits knows about SV40. What I do know is that I worked with and knew both Dr Bernice Eddy and Dr Anthony J Morris, who worked with SV40. I also knew - and have, Dr Robert Hulls monograph on all the different types of simian viruses found in culture medium up to 1968 ( over 100 ).

None of them ever mentioned that SV40 came from SIV. However, Dr Herbert Ratner gave some Salk polio vaccine to a scientist called Dr Bohanon, who apparently found SIV in it.

I know that both Bernice and Anthony were way more concerned about the SV40/adenovirus stealth virus that developed when the military adenovirus vaccines were made on SV 40 contaminated culture medium, The manufacture of measles vaccines was also initially done on that culture but they stopped that really quickly once stealth viruses were obvious.

They both also mentioned the Mason Pfizer Monkey Virus in terms of it's impact on human immune systems, and Anthony did a study showing that the majority of polio vaccine recipients had antibody evidence of response to MPMV. But MPMV seemed to disappear off the radar in terms of possible issues.

Obviously back then with so liitle known and the crude tools they had, it wouldn't be easy to speculate.

All of them felt that there would be other stealth viruses that would eventuate. But all of them felt that SV40 had much worse potential in terms of gene modification - and worse meant better for the GMO industry so SV40 became their mainstay.

So that is a potted history as I know it.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the reply. Nevertheless, I don't see how SV40 sequences acting in cis could trigger a tumorigenesis process, even if they bind p53 or go to the nucleus. Mechanistically it doesn't make sense.

Expand full comment

Self described “cancer genome jock” Dr Philip Buckhaults , who is himself injected with the C19 mRNA solution and has a PhD in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, appeared before the South Carolina Senate to explain why he is concerned about integration. His explanation is thorough and concise; this is what he does for a living. He has already said in an interview that he can basically “ guarantee” that integration has / is occurring given there are billions of DNA particles in each shot which have gone into billions of arms anywhere from once to now, six times.

Hope his explanation helps.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C7Qs166xR28

Expand full comment

Thanks for the explanation and link, I hadn't watched it. I agree that genome integration is a threat but I disagree that integration of "crap" is an efficient way to cause cancer or any high mortality/morbidity disease. I believe that focusing on sequencing of the largest DNA and mRNA fragments might yield more important information as they might carry relevant genes that can cause disease.

Expand full comment

Have you looked at the research on how and why those SV40 sequences can promote cancer?

Kevin would not be concerned if it doesn't make sense. The reality is well described by Ed Dowd.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OYMczJC7fs&t=901s

Expand full comment

Those SV40 sequences are simply strong cis regulatory modules that if integrated might or not affect downstream genes. Cancer would be the rarest outcome and that's why this narrative for increased cancer rates would not be favored. Thanks for the link, I'm familiar with the studies done in Portugal. Kevin should be concerned as he might be following a red herring.

Expand full comment
Apr 7·edited Apr 7

I'm not Kevin, so he can answer to whether or not he's following a red herring. Kevin is a very smart man, way ahead of anyone else when it comes to this sort of work, so it would be unusual for someone with his breadth of knowledge to made an unfounded hypothesis.

Perhaps you would like to tell readers your background and why you think cancer is accelerating in the injected, the way it is. I would be really interesting in hearing what you think is in the vaccine that is combining to become a timebomb.

We all know that cancer is a multi-hit process and no one thing usually leads to tumorigenesis.

We don't know what the non-spike open reading frame is, or the consequences of slipping and proteins being read wrongly or backwards either.

I used to work with an NIH scientist who found in his laboratory that the alum absorbed whole cell pertussis vaccine given to mice in tiny doses mimicking human neonatal doses resulted in a 10.2% increase in mouse cancers, whereas alum alone (the control) did not.

We have always known that e.coli and other endotoxins are bad news. A good historical example that he was involved in was the use of L-asparaginase in the treatment of leukemia. He shouted blue murder at the authorities saying that the serious morbidity and toxicity of L-asparaginase was due to it being derived from E.coli. It took a few years for them to listen to him, but when they substituted erwinia carotovora in e.coli's place, there were no more deaths or toxic effects from the L-asparaginase.

There is a huge amount of early literature on just how you don't want anything to do with high levels of E.coli endotoxaemia proliferating in the gut, let alone presented as part of the milieu of an injection.

Given that the plasmid is grown on E.coli and the vaccine itself, has significant enough endotoxin levels it could be SV40 + endotoxin, BUT then when you look at the genetics of the "spike" itself, which the body then makes, as well as random protein that is misread, that adds to the multi-hit issue, and you also have the effect of parts of the actual spike, "dialing down" the immune system, which could mean that fewer hits are needed because the immune system loses the ability to control cumulative downstream effects of multiple injections. That is my weird hypothesis.....but I too could be pissing into the wind.

I think with this, we are, literally, going where no man has gone before, so it would be very interesting to hear your take.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the explanation. It's true that cancer requires multiple hits and for this reason cancer researchers have tried to recapitulate the key mutations in cancer DRIVER genes (please read my first comment supported with one good reference, if you need more, please let me know, there are hundreds). Take a look at this older one https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821689/ -- My background doesn't make my statements true or false. Likewise, Kevin is certainly smart and for sure he will figure out whether vaccine ingredients can integrate into the human genome. But integration of garbage doesn't explain carcinogenesis. If a bioweapon were to be built it would make use of accumulated knowledge as described in the papers mentioned. I think there's a better yield at sequencing cDNA from purified RNA from vaccine vials (looking for Cas9, contraceptive vaccine, LINE-1 sequences, etc).

Expand full comment

There is more to my weird hypothesis but that is enough of it for now...

Expand full comment

If I had a dime for every time someone said that....😉

Seriously though, the body is an adaptive organisim, even from its own "mechanistic" rules. Consider, what if...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1084952123002288

Expand full comment

Food for thought but poor design of a bioweapon.

Expand full comment

What say this "bioweapon" is designed to work in several directions at once, each step triggering a new mini bonfire? {part of my own weird hypothesis.

After all, there are specific, suspicious, strategically placed sequences on the spike that have to have been put there for a purpose, and we know what some of them might be.

I think the designer know the end point and are just sitting playing tiddly winks, while they amusedly watch the rest of us trying to play catch-up.

Expand full comment

I appreciate your thoughts on this. I think you make a good point regarding the improbability of random mutagenic integration of plasmid sequences being the culprit behind turbo cancers. (The "turbo" nature of the cancers seems to suggest a common mechanism [immune system-based?], but mutagenic integration doesn't fit the bill.) In trying to determine what the planners have done, I get stuck on timing. It seems clear that decades ago, the narrative — "pandemic that only vaccination can solve" — was written (e.g. Hollywood's "Outbreak" (1995) and several other movies/TV shows). Do you think the planners were waiting around for a relatively new method like CRISPR-Cas9 before they could proceed? Perhaps they were. I wrestle with this idea. Obviously I don't know. But to me it seems like an uncharacteristically risky bet for the planners, a group of people who I imagine strive to leave nothing to chance. And this was a big, BIG operation. And they were only going to get one shot to do this (no pun intended). So, for example, was there enough time between the establishment of a relatively new method like CRISPR-Cas9 and the testing on humans that confirmed their poison could predictably and reliably cause a desired level of delayed morbidity? That seems like a very tight window to me. So anyway, the time variable causes me to speculate about something simpler that was developed much earlier (70s? 80s?) at which point they THEN begin to write and sell the narrative to their targets and start making preparations for their crime. But perhaps they were confident.

The heart/blood disease associated with the shot would seem to be caused by a different poison than that which causes the turbo cancers. So I lean towards the idea that a small variety of poisons were used. Perhaps different contractors were responsible for different poisons. But I think that all of the poisons were tested on humans well-before 2020 — that is, we're not seeing an experiment unfold, but rather an attack with known weapons.

Expand full comment

Hi Tom, thanks for sharing your interesting ideas. I agree that this is a huge operation of biblical proportions. In fact, the earliest narrative is biblical. So this story has been developing for some time. It’s the story of Noah’s Ark in the Genesis or the Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh, about a form of massive genocide (flood) to solve the sin of overpopulation in a finite planet committed by resource intensive growing populations (Cain’s descendants) in contrast to Abel’s descendants (aboriginal nomadic people) whose growth is ecologically friendly. Please read Daniel Quinn’s book ISHMAEL for the meaning of these otherwise misunderstood biblical stories. Many elite Judeo-Christian groups are aware that the growth of human populations in the planet eventually would reach a point of resource depletion and mutual wars, thus prompting the need to execute a global genocide (of the 99%, Main street), to save ecological systems in the planet (Agenda 21) and saving a few human groups (wealthy, powerful, the 1%, Wall Street) who would own most of the resources. The Georgia Guidestones commandments outline these goals. So elite globalist groups have been preparing for centuries (like Masons) to concentrate power (bankers) and devise ways for population reduction and control. I agree with you that they were waiting for powerful technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 to reach a level of maturity to be able to carry out this form of genocide. A good reference time point for intentionality is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (1986). The federal government took upon itself the liability for injuries caused by manufacturer’s vaccine products with the purpose to protect and defend vaccine’s reputation at all costs. Why? Because vaccines can serve as vehicles for biological weapons while providing a plausible deniable cover to strive for everybody’s health and well-being. If vaccines can carry bioweapons, there’s a need to justify their global deployment so I agree that movies like Outbreak help implant fear in people’s minds to accept massive immunization campaigns. I agree that the time window is larger than the last 3 decades. Another reference time point is the NSSM 200 or Kissinger Report on Population Control (1974) that proposes rather old tools to control fertility. The first contraceptive vaccine was developed in 1994 (hCG, Talwar) while the first cases of vaccine-induced ovarian failure occurred in 2014 when Gardasil was deployed around the world. I concur that different contractors were responsible for different poisons and different injuries which is consistent with the DoD’s OTA mechanism (Other Transaction Authority), as described by Katherine/Sasha. I tend to believe the planners have had the chance of multiple shots (Gardasil was one, C-19 mRNA LNPs was the next one, and we expect another for disease X). I believe that the first shots are being used as learning points for the 3rd one. Most of the testing has been in animals. For example it’s possible to cause cancer in animals with genetic tools (Cell paper in my first comment) so jumping into humans it’s not that difficult. Other lesions can be produced also based on knowledge of mechanisms of disease for the main mortality causes. Have a good day.

Expand full comment

Thank you very much Pompilio, again, for taking the time to write yet another thoughtful comment. I was really just curious to get your take on possible mechanisms of the turbo cancers. I just yesterday heard Sasha speak in a video about how mRNA trials (from the early 2000s?) showed they caused cancer — I need to find out where that information is and read it, if it's even available. Perhaps they're also described as "turbo cancers" in those trials? Perhaps Sasha has a Substack post on this — I'm a new subscriber and haven't searched her archive yet. So thanks again and all the best to you as you navigate through these crazy times.

Expand full comment

Hi Tom. For a long time, cancer researchers have been trying to understand how cancers arise. They have come to the conclusion that mutations need to occur in CANCER DRIVER GENES in the following fashion: gain-of-function mutations in proto-oncogenes associated with cell growth (say, K-ras); accompanied by loss-of-function mutations in tumor suppressor genes associated with genome repair (say, p53). - To recapitulate this hypothesis, they have used traditional approaches like transgenic animals and have demonstrated beyond doubt that it's correct. When the most advanced tool (CRISPR-Cas9) was mastered, they were able to use it to cause cancer in animal models by engineering such mutations. Please take a look at this article (there are many more, this is just the second I've read). https://www.cell.com/fulltext/S0092-8674(14)01163-5 or this other link to the same article DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.014

All ingredients necessary to achieve these mutations can be packaged in lipid nanoparticles being the most challenging for the manufacturer Cas9 mRNA because of its large size (>4.1 kilo base pairs, kbp of CDS). Kevin or colleagues have analyzed the sizes of mRNA fragments in vaccine vials and have found that the largest ones are extremely scarce. This could be because mRNA is highly unstable even at freezing temperatures and so degradation might have occurred in vials analyzed. The large mRNA size means that the molar abundance is low as well but might be sufficient upon cell entry to be translated into protein and loaded with small guide RNAs contained also in vaccine vials (harder to detect because of their small size). This way, a fully functional CRISPR-Cas9 system might be deployed in human cells to initiate cancer in somatic tissues as well as the germ line. The only other ingredient necessary to cause reliable gain-of-function mutations is a fragment of DNA homologous to the targeted genes to make sure that repair of Cas9 double stranded break doesn't cause an indel (insertion-deletion) but rather a homologous repair or HDR (homology directed repair). The article describes all of this. So theoretically, everything can be packaged in mRNA LNPs. The difficulty to detect such cargo is to get good chain of custody of unopened /unreconstituted vials from Pfizer or Moderna. Intensive purification of mRNAs of both small and large sizes needs to be done (and reverse transcription) to be able to identify gRNAs, HDR DNA fragments and Cas9 coding sequences via Next Generation Sequencing to be certain those cancer genes targeted in corresponding lots. Not an easy feat. I hope this helps. Cheers.

Expand full comment

Thank you very much, Pompilio.

So in your mind, you have little doubt that a predictable and effective CRISPR-Cas9-based cancer-inducing poison could be produced at worldwide scale prior to 2019/2020. Is this essentially your working hypothesis for the turbo cancers? Definitely plausible and worth investigating. My initial instinct was that this method was too recent to have been employed in 2020/2021. I just couldn't wrap my head around the idea that they were waiting around for the development of a method like CRISPR-Cas9 before proceeding with their 2020/2030/2050 agendas. Seemed too risky to make a precondition out of an uncontrollable event (CRISPR-Cas9 development). What if the advent of CRISPR-Cas9 hadn't occurred until 2024? Would "Covid" have been pushed to 2030 instead of 2020? Maybe so?

I think back to the cessation of the general -80C freezing requirement for vials that was announced early on in 2021. It was obviously infeasible to provide deep-freezing worldwide, in various, often strange (and warm) contexts where shots were administered. The fact that this requirement quickly became optional made me think that the mRNA aspect of the shots was baloney, since presumably, this measure (keeping vials frozen) would be critical for ensuring the preservation of RNAs and the inhibition of RNases. In other words, I concluded the recommended freezing measure (and "mRNA technology" generally) was just more theater. Why would the planners rely on something they couldn't deliver. What'd you think of this turn of events? Were the planners aware that non-freezing wasn't ideal, but they were confident they would hit their goals anyway and proceeded regardless? If I were doing an experiment, I would make certain everything was ideal so as to ensure success.

Also curious to know your informed opinion:

Do you think a CRISPR-Cas9 mechansim is behind the heart symptoms as well?

Do you think the advertised spike-based mechanism is responsible for any of the reported non-cancerous effects ("covid" flu symptoms, blood clotting, myocarditis, etc.) or even responsible for anything at all? That is, do you believe the spike angle to be a distraction? Obviously it has been the focus of most investigations to date.

Have you considered or seen any evidence of simple chemical poisons such as high doses of aluminum being used? Do you find the possibility of a concerted reliance on such chemicals to be improbable?

Thanks in advance for any response to this barrage of questions. There is so much chatter on the internet, it is hard for me to discern the signal from the noise. (Are the long white fibrous clots found in cadavers a real, common thing as reported by a few morticians? Could we not derive helpful information from studying the clots themselves — e.g. their composition?)

Expand full comment

Hi Tom, thanks for your thoughtful comment. I believe CRISPR/Cas9 is such a powerful technology that I don’t see why it would go to waste. The CELL article I shared before was published in 2014 so by 2019 it's not far fetched to believe planners adopted it early. A summary here: PMID: 30079312. The genetic pathogenesis of cancer was proven in animal models before CRISPR-Cas9 came (PMID: 20399958). Other techniques like RNAi (RNA interference) have a good chance of having been deployed, which is essentially a way to downregulate gene(s) using miRNA under an appropriate promoter; it can be packaged in LNPs and would be hard to detect because of their small size. Still integration into the genome would be needed to guarantee constitutive expression. The mRNA LNPs is a very versatile platform to planners because theoretically any gene can be targeted at will. - So from a hypothetical point of view, these and other gene therapy platforms are feasible to be deployed in LNPs. - Before jumping into conclusions, we have to wait for people with the capability to carry out these experiments to tell us whether carcinogenic CRISPR/Cas9, downregulating RNAi, contraceptive vaccine ingredients, etc are present in vaccine vials. Let’s remember that besides health care there are other fronts where this war is being fought such as banking, finance, food sovereignty, education, politics, energy, security, journalism, communications, etc. There’s a net transfer of wealth from the 99% to the 1%. The agenda is making progress everyday. As explained before, the goal is a massive downsizing of human activities and transition to a tightly controlled world.

Although it might be possible to cause cancer by random genomic damage as Dr. Buckhaults explained in the SC Senate hearing, it’s way more effective to go directly to cancer driver genes as described in the papers mentioned before. That would be the most efficient way to increase mortality, increase profits (through oncology care) and still have plausible deniability (was the 2nd cause of mortality in pre-Covid times). So far, there’s no evidence that CRISPR/Cas9 was used with such a purpose in humans. Maybe nobody has looked into it. - Regarding whether the agenda was waiting for gene editing technology to mature, I believe the agenda was making progress without it. Please take a look at the deployment of contraceptive vaccines (inferred from cases of premature ovarian failure) in the context of Gardasil that targeted adolescent girls around the world. The technology used was virus-like particles and still made progress.

I wasn’t aware of the cessation of freezing temperatures for vials. Thanks for bringing that up. I need to find an explanation that makes sense. The only one that comes to mind is that a more stable platform was deployed to make non-freezing temperatures the norm. - It’s important to keep in mind that there might be hundreds of different products for a single brand, even if for the sake of simplicity we just say “Pfizer vaccine” leaving the impression that there’s only one such embodiment.

I don’t have an explanation for myocarditis or white fibrous clots. Many studies have looked at the toxicity of the Spike protein, although I see it more as a side effect than the true intended target. Aluminum adjuvants can be toxic as shown by French researchers (Macrophagic Myofasciitis/myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) and Israeli Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld (ASIA syndrome). Soluble aluminum is toxic for people with reduced renal function. Certainly it’s a poor man’s way to cause massive genocide of a biblical scale. There’s still the chance that the mRNA LNP platform by itself (without any deleterious cargo) might be toxic and explain thrombosis as the most salient severe manifestation besides death.

Expand full comment

Special K - "There is a hilarious tweet from Debunk the funk" MDM (Mis, Dis & Mal) information Tweets from that pharma shill, twit & git are legion. As useless as tits on a bull.

Expand full comment

Not just useless but very harmful. The public seeks to understand. The malinformation mob has made this impossible as they have led people in a hundred different nonsense directions.

Expand full comment

Indeed. All these useless idiots and their talking points are intended to muddy the waters, and discredit the legitimate anti narrative malvax movement. They get incentivized to muddy the waters by our government and their big pharma sponsors. They all have blood on their hands, and a special place awaits them.

Expand full comment

I've grown my own Cannabis since 2009. Mendelian hybridization is fine. Meddling with the DNA in the Cannabis genome directly is dangerous. Meddling with the DNA in our bodies is sheer insanity and above the pay grade of all humans. Be careful what you allow or wish for.

In my version of the Garden of Eden one should always be encouraged to eat from the tree of knowledge but should never meddle with the tree of life as that is above the pay grade of ANY human: past, present or future. Think of the sorcerers apprentice and all the unanticipated problems his meddling created. Those of us that understand the complexity of the global ecosystem tend to abide by the precautionary principle. The globalists have the audacity to think they can meddle with the Tree of Life with no consequence. They they seem to abide by the "Let's just do shit and see what happens" principle. I can't seem to find an antonym for the Precautionary Principle.

Our globalist corporations have obviously ignored this warning as GMO farming began/expanded in the early 1990's. Using CRISPR and other cutting edge technologies they have meddled with the tree of life: terminator seeds, plants that produce insecticides (which we eat), spraying plants with Glyphosate etc. Already it is clear these technologies are causing harm to human health. Then we have fluoride in the water supply, endocrine disruptors, PFAS chemicals etc., in or food and water. None of this makes sense and represents a willful refusal to consider what our collective knowledge (e.g., the tree of knowledge) should be telling us about the harm these substances unleash on the human population. But is goes on unabated because global corporations can profit in the short run.

Then came the Plandemic and the mRNA vaccines the did not prevent infection/transmission but did cause considerable harm and death. Worse yet there is growing evidence that these mRNA injections may actually be modifying our DNA and the consequences are just beginning to be understood. Of course this has all been ignored by globalist corporate media. And over the past year I have read numerous papers about self assembly nanobots within the vaccines and much more. I've yet to write about this subject as, at first, I was a skeptic. But perhaps it is time to cover the subject because there is plenty of evidence/papers etc. which suggest the globalists want to use mRNA concoctions in conjunction with 5G EMF radiation to control our moods and literally allow the government to get inside our heads. And thanks to the author for detailing the programs that are already underway.

It is now obvious that the WEF, UN, WHO etc. want full control of humanity. They aren't even shy about their plans: a Great Reset where you will own nothing (and really won't be happy at all). And it is all spelled out in Agenda21, Agenda2030, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's). They have very complex plans to exert control of every human on planet Earth. Their goal is a fully controlled global population -- which will relegate every human to the status of a slave on a globalist plantation.

WE THE PEOPLE, of planet Earth, need to immediately unite behind our own complex agenda in order to stop this globalist coup. To that end I've put together what I call the "Put People First" agenda, which has developed over the past 5 years. I'm encouraging everyone to endorse this agenda and cite your support at City Council, School Board meetings as well as during protests. As Benjamin Franklin once said at the signing of the Declaration of Independence: "We must all hang together, or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately." Here is the PPF agenda as it currently exists:

* No Lockdowns EVER again

* No forced masking ANYWHERE

* No forced vaccinations under ANY circumstance whether that be from injection, food or chemtrails

* Absolutely no vaccine passports or digital currency

* Reinstate all of those that lost jobs for refusing to get the mRNA injection, including all of our Healthcare workers

* Universal non-coercive choice: Wearing a mask or getting a mRNA injection will be up to each individual and there will be ABSOLUTELY no penalty for not complying in or out of the workplace.

* No more censorship of ANYONE whether that be on social media, corporate media or at the workplace. No one should ever be censored or punished for exercising their First Amendment Right to Free Speech.

* Impeach Biden/Harris and reinstate Trump as our president.

* Stop the LGBTQ and CRT indoctrination in our schools and corporations

* Stop the Climate Agenda and make Energy Independence Priority Number One.

* Send every Illegal Alien, that Biden has brought in through Open Borders, back home.

* Stop the illegal mass imigration invasion worldwide

* Legalize the personal cultivation of Cannabis, Psilocybin.

* Legalize the right to take Ivermectin, Hydrochloriquine and other anti-viral herbs and drugs

* Legalize the right to choose when it comes to vaccines, abortion, drugs etc.

* Eliminate Genetically modified vaccines, plants, animals (fish, cattle etc.) and the use of Glyphosate.

* Eliminate the use of Geoengineering: Chemtrails, HAARP etc.* Eliminate the fluoridation of our water supply.

* Stop allowing Blackrock, and other financial institutions from buying up residential properties which will make it impossible for future families to own a home and build up equity.

* Demand your government defund and exit the UN, WHO and WEF

https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/immediately-implement-put-people-first-agenda-ppfa

https://brucecain.substack.com/

Expand full comment

Don't buy from companies that won't accept cash!!! That is the road to digital currency. Just say No and walk away.

Expand full comment

That is great advice. But consider the most likely scenario. First the backend to a digital currency is already in process through FEDNOW and similar programs throughout the planet. So one fine day Biden announces that you have a month to convert all you cash to a digital currency . . . after which date your paper money becomes worthless. What are you going to do then: burn your cash to heat your home? No as much as I support the use of cash the only real solution is to stop the implementation of a digital currency. Please sign the Put People First Agenda so our elected officials understand we are on to them.

https://www.petition2congress.com/ctas/immediately-implement-put-people-first-agenda-ppfa

I would also encourage you to subscribe to my free newsletter to understand these issues in more depth. All of us is all we need to stop a globalist slave state internationally.

https://brucecain.substack.com/

Expand full comment

Agree🤝 there ultimate aim is to position themselves as god's in this new realm they seek to create.

They have no natural dominion over the living "natural" (the blood flows and the flesh lives) wo/man.

The digital realm with hybridised humans is what they seek and full ownership of all livestock onboard there ship.

5G is vital to the plan, hence the rush to role it out🚀🏁

Expand full comment

Without a doubt I find Thomas Paine's Common Sense essential reading. And of course Thomas Paine kinda rhymes with Bruce William Cain. So there's that. LOL

Sadly through decades of public school indoctrination our younger generations have been indoctrinated toward acceptance of a globalist agenda. Same can be said of Globalist Corporate Media (CNN, MSNBC, FOX, AP, etc.).

Oh I just found out yesterday the Biden could well sign the WHO Pandemic Treaty without the consent of Congress. Hopefully that leads to the inevitable: a 2nd American Revolution.

Expand full comment

Fantastic strategy, share with the world, let's see if they have enough fingers to plug all the holes in the dam. I can hear the water coming.

Expand full comment

It's 20 years since I produced at a lab bench. It is astounding how the technology has advanced.

Expand full comment

THIS ➡️has become a joke , a candle in the wind ➡️. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7923912/

Expand full comment
Apr 7·edited Apr 7

I thought the orthodox intelligentsia in med schools had captured and redefined "ethics" as rebranding for the normalization of malthusian eugenics in the modern era?

As GK Chesterton observed and published in 1922: there's a terrible problem emerging with the practice of scientific officialism and strict social organization. Is this not the very essence of institutional malignancy?

Creeps crept in were only devils dared to tread. Reminds me of Grandad's old joke about how to conjugate the verb "crept" - crept in, crapped and crept out. That about sums it.

But it doesn't speak to the fetish of overly large populations of the emerging postmodern condescentii in today's academy. The fetish: they gotta sh*t where WE eat. Scatalogical promiscuity has become a thing.

Expand full comment

Ethos , it’s mutated .

Expand full comment

Real life stuff that is so sci-fi. Truly amazing. Thank you.

Expand full comment

Concerning unrelated side note I stumbled across pertaining to previous topics:

LINE 1 is also heavily expressed in developing neurons, and is dysregulated in some neurological diseases

https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155822

Expand full comment
Apr 7·edited Apr 7

Phenomenal work. I am in awe.

But then there is yet another wild card. Should the following go badly in unexpected ways, the much feared Black Swan Event may instead morph into a billion sporulating Cicadas:

https://x.com/CBSNews/status/1776932936090005797

Human engineered fungus amongus. Is Jeffery Epstein's BFF involved in this one too?

Expand full comment

interesting research; where do the cannabidiol receptors (cb1 and cb2) come into play based on this theory of Gene Sequencing?

Expand full comment