The Offit quotes are insane. Is he unaware it standard procedure to transfect mammalian cells by basically exposing them to DNA (in my day using electroporation to cross the cell wall but obviously we have LNPs to do that better now).
Just outright lying.
Do you have a source for those quotes by the way? Seems like a receipt worth keeping..
Goes to show how Offit actually represented planted dissent. He appeared to have a dissenting opinion, only to be enabling even greater corruption at deeper administrative levels.
Makes you wonder about people like Vinay Prasad, even.
When there's one guy in a situation of vast consensus that isn't immediately purged in a situation of lockstep conformity, such as within the FDA, CDC, and many other branches of government, you can probably assume he's up to something. Manufactured consent, manufactured dissent.
This is a good point. I’ve wondered about Offit’s dissent with boosters… Alternative explanation could be that once you are a part of the crime, there is no way out, alive…
The Church of Science is absolutely a thing and its true believers borrow a lot from the more militant parts of traditional religions.
People say "I believe in Science" and "I trust the Science" without irony and without understanding that the only thing you should believe in is "the scientific method" of testing hypotheses.
Kevin, you work tirelessly trying to expose the corruption we are suffocating under. I thank you. Norm Fenton a statistician on substack wrote how the NHS in the U.K fudged up stats as well counted people unvaccinated if they got an adverse effect from the vaccine within 20 days. Everything is so corrupt. On Paul Thacker’s lastest substack on the origins was an excellent read. Pamela Drew from the comments posted a link written in 2005 entitled “Bird Flu: A corporate bonanza for the biotech industry.” The depth of capture and corruption is dangerous and stomach turning. I wonder about these obsequious fact checkers. Who are they? If they were vaccinated wouldn’t they be concerned about the emerging evidence? The hierarchy is top heavy with those who only see making more money. They don’t realize they have a sick obsession which is addictive. It’s all so life threatening to us.
and this doesn't even cover the fact that Fauci 'just' signed off on 1000's of grants without even reading them...
That GFP+Spike construct can definitely clarify to which portion of it the p53 binds... Plus control study of having just GFP and p53 could clarify the situation even better.
Great exposure, just wouldn't combine religion with fraud, like your title implicates..
I asked at an early resistance meeting three years ago if the churches weren't resisting the mandates and nonsense. The leader said "No- even the Mormons are fully behind the government."
At a recent Ascension Day service at Christ Church Cathedral in Victoria, the Vice-Admiral ( oops- Archdeacon) reminded us of the Climate Crisis(TM) in his sermon, and the communion servers were decked out in their black masks of subjugation. The music of the service was very good.
Your American experience is perhaps a bit more fundamentalist than common here, which may account for some of the difference.
Harnessing organized religion was a primary Jab marketing strategy used in Australia for the Covid19 frenzy. It is currently a key to mass marketing of Contagion Kits and GMO siRNA LNP intravenous delivery worldwide.
The marketing strategy was here in US as well. Collins went around to the 'leaders', pressing the flesh and singing songs. It was disgusting to watch. Literally, trying to influence the religious exemptions. Wicked people.
Here in California, most 'independent' large churches did not fall for it. FBI was writing down license plates of those who attended in a large field, "drive-in" style and also the beach singing services. I was one of the few white-haired folks...the young people were so inspiring! Can't sing with a mask on!
CatManDu - A cogent and sweeping indictment. The journal editors Freed & Schildgen supervised the peer review which accepted Jiang & Mei's paper. Hello!!! Freed is from NIH @ Fort Detrick. Schildgen is tethered to multiple gov research and health agencies in EU. Two months later, the vax nazi sez no soup for you? Nothing to see here.
I appreciate this article! And the PS. As a follower of Christ, I had not taken offense. I would only add that it may be more appropriately “The Cult of Peter Review” (meaning top-down control and abuse of authority to elicit otherwise irrational thought and behavior)
Not completely off-topic, but could you comment on this?
"Numerous papers published on "Spikeopathy" have to be discounted because Commercial Spike used is made in mammalian cell banks more often than not contaminated with Endotoxin that is the key driver of p53 Cancer Suppression that featured in the retracted paper. Pay attention to ZMAT3 and WIG-1.
Scientific censorship by conflicted Universities could be reduced by eliminating Big Pharma funding.
Cost to taxpayers will be more than compensated through improved Public Health.
Dr. Pain restacked Rebekah Barnett, and this was the intro paragraph. I'd give you a link, but it just directs to Barnett's piece without the intro.
I get that endotoxin contamination is a problem; however, there are several components of the shots that interact with p53. Hard to see how the presence of endotoxin removes the other risks.
Thanks for the post-script, as a woman of faith in a Creator, comparisons to some spiritual institutions is far from offensive. And, in this case, quite appropriate.....there are some pretty sketchy private-jet, palatial estate owning "inspirational leaders" out there hawking their good news. These folks aren't dealing with the physical body/illness/death, these are toying around with souls. These are predators, not the normal nonsense that goes on within human institutions.
This isn't mere hypocrisy which is off-the-charts.
It's the intentional, callous harm that they do.
Thank you for all your amazing work, Kevin. I just found your substack (yeah!).
“This same agency worked tirelessly to ensure the most toxic part of that virus became the vaccine as they had patents on the solution to the mess they created”.
There must be an alternative explanation for this. Moderna had made several amendments to their patent applications many months prior to the alleged lab leak in 2019.
Just as an aside, gain of function is not really possible. Recombination of genetic sequences doesn’t guarantee gain of function; i.e. improved fitness or making the virus more lethal, more infections or more transmissible. For example, very fast dividing and mutating bacteria may gain some advantage, or fitness, over other bacteria by accumulating deleterious mutations (breaking genes) but that is not really a gain of function. It is the opposite, the loss of function that at times may provide some advantage.
My explanation would be that NIH worked tirelessly to make sure that whatever was causing concerns in Wuhan, China, was blamed on the coronavirus with the specific sequence that had been patented years ago but last amended in early 2019 - many months prior to the alleged outbreak…
Good take Kevin. PhDarded is right. Love it.
The Offit quotes are insane. Is he unaware it standard procedure to transfect mammalian cells by basically exposing them to DNA (in my day using electroporation to cross the cell wall but obviously we have LNPs to do that better now).
Just outright lying.
Do you have a source for those quotes by the way? Seems like a receipt worth keeping..
Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/no-covid-mrna-vaccines-wont-damage-your-dna1/
Goes to show how Offit actually represented planted dissent. He appeared to have a dissenting opinion, only to be enabling even greater corruption at deeper administrative levels.
Makes you wonder about people like Vinay Prasad, even.
When there's one guy in a situation of vast consensus that isn't immediately purged in a situation of lockstep conformity, such as within the FDA, CDC, and many other branches of government, you can probably assume he's up to something. Manufactured consent, manufactured dissent.
This is a good point. I’ve wondered about Offit’s dissent with boosters… Alternative explanation could be that once you are a part of the crime, there is no way out, alive…
The Church of Science is absolutely a thing and its true believers borrow a lot from the more militant parts of traditional religions.
People say "I believe in Science" and "I trust the Science" without irony and without understanding that the only thing you should believe in is "the scientific method" of testing hypotheses.
Kevin, you work tirelessly trying to expose the corruption we are suffocating under. I thank you. Norm Fenton a statistician on substack wrote how the NHS in the U.K fudged up stats as well counted people unvaccinated if they got an adverse effect from the vaccine within 20 days. Everything is so corrupt. On Paul Thacker’s lastest substack on the origins was an excellent read. Pamela Drew from the comments posted a link written in 2005 entitled “Bird Flu: A corporate bonanza for the biotech industry.” The depth of capture and corruption is dangerous and stomach turning. I wonder about these obsequious fact checkers. Who are they? If they were vaccinated wouldn’t they be concerned about the emerging evidence? The hierarchy is top heavy with those who only see making more money. They don’t realize they have a sick obsession which is addictive. It’s all so life threatening to us.
Pam's piece is next on my reading tonight! Thanks Vivien.
and this doesn't even cover the fact that Fauci 'just' signed off on 1000's of grants without even reading them...
That GFP+Spike construct can definitely clarify to which portion of it the p53 binds... Plus control study of having just GFP and p53 could clarify the situation even better.
Great exposure, just wouldn't combine religion with fraud, like your title implicates..
This is a really important point.
Religious folks at least celebrate their beliefs being an act of faith.
Where scientists demand you believe their believes as facts through coercion.
And the number of Christian’s that are on the right side of this fight is testament to how more centered they are.
In some cases...
I asked at an early resistance meeting three years ago if the churches weren't resisting the mandates and nonsense. The leader said "No- even the Mormons are fully behind the government."
At a recent Ascension Day service at Christ Church Cathedral in Victoria, the Vice-Admiral ( oops- Archdeacon) reminded us of the Climate Crisis(TM) in his sermon, and the communion servers were decked out in their black masks of subjugation. The music of the service was very good.
Your American experience is perhaps a bit more fundamentalist than common here, which may account for some of the difference.
You’re on fire, CatMan!🔥😺
Harnessing organized religion was a primary Jab marketing strategy used in Australia for the Covid19 frenzy. It is currently a key to mass marketing of Contagion Kits and GMO siRNA LNP intravenous delivery worldwide.
The marketing strategy was here in US as well. Collins went around to the 'leaders', pressing the flesh and singing songs. It was disgusting to watch. Literally, trying to influence the religious exemptions. Wicked people.
https://apnews.com/article/baptist-health-abortion-coronavirus-pandemic-coronavirus-vaccine-8deb3edf4fa590a784e4bfd56a80e8da
Here in California, most 'independent' large churches did not fall for it. FBI was writing down license plates of those who attended in a large field, "drive-in" style and also the beach singing services. I was one of the few white-haired folks...the young people were so inspiring! Can't sing with a mask on!
The marketing strategy is real.
CatManDu - A cogent and sweeping indictment. The journal editors Freed & Schildgen supervised the peer review which accepted Jiang & Mei's paper. Hello!!! Freed is from NIH @ Fort Detrick. Schildgen is tethered to multiple gov research and health agencies in EU. Two months later, the vax nazi sez no soup for you? Nothing to see here.
I appreciate this article! And the PS. As a follower of Christ, I had not taken offense. I would only add that it may be more appropriately “The Cult of Peter Review” (meaning top-down control and abuse of authority to elicit otherwise irrational thought and behavior)
Not completely off-topic, but could you comment on this?
"Numerous papers published on "Spikeopathy" have to be discounted because Commercial Spike used is made in mammalian cell banks more often than not contaminated with Endotoxin that is the key driver of p53 Cancer Suppression that featured in the retracted paper. Pay attention to ZMAT3 and WIG-1.
Scientific censorship by conflicted Universities could be reduced by eliminating Big Pharma funding.
Cost to taxpayers will be more than compensated through improved Public Health.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/p53-tumor-inhibition-is-hit-by-endotoxin"
Dr. Pain restacked Rebekah Barnett, and this was the intro paragraph. I'd give you a link, but it just directs to Barnett's piece without the intro.
I get that endotoxin contamination is a problem; however, there are several components of the shots that interact with p53. Hard to see how the presence of endotoxin removes the other risks.
Peer review is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
Thanks for the post-script, as a woman of faith in a Creator, comparisons to some spiritual institutions is far from offensive. And, in this case, quite appropriate.....there are some pretty sketchy private-jet, palatial estate owning "inspirational leaders" out there hawking their good news. These folks aren't dealing with the physical body/illness/death, these are toying around with souls. These are predators, not the normal nonsense that goes on within human institutions.
This isn't mere hypocrisy which is off-the-charts.
It's the intentional, callous harm that they do.
Thank you for all your amazing work, Kevin. I just found your substack (yeah!).
Important post script. Thanks for making it.
Great post, Kevin!
“This same agency worked tirelessly to ensure the most toxic part of that virus became the vaccine as they had patents on the solution to the mess they created”.
There must be an alternative explanation for this. Moderna had made several amendments to their patent applications many months prior to the alleged lab leak in 2019.
Just as an aside, gain of function is not really possible. Recombination of genetic sequences doesn’t guarantee gain of function; i.e. improved fitness or making the virus more lethal, more infections or more transmissible. For example, very fast dividing and mutating bacteria may gain some advantage, or fitness, over other bacteria by accumulating deleterious mutations (breaking genes) but that is not really a gain of function. It is the opposite, the loss of function that at times may provide some advantage.
My explanation would be that NIH worked tirelessly to make sure that whatever was causing concerns in Wuhan, China, was blamed on the coronavirus with the specific sequence that had been patented years ago but last amended in early 2019 - many months prior to the alleged outbreak…