Thank you for sharing Ana. Since you have done testing on the actual Pfizer/Moderna vials for the DNA contamination, did you also find graphene oxidie or any self-assembly circuits inside the vials?
I'm not a microbiologist or anything, but this business with the self-assembling nanotechnology, bluetooth MACs and even the graphene oxide sound like "poisoning the well" to me. It's probably a given that there are technologies which TPTB conceal from us which are advanced beyond the current known state of the art, but self-assembling nanotechnology is not likely to be one of them. Setting aside the problem of how these tiny machines would harvest and manipulate the raw materials they'd need to replicate, there is the issue of the power source. While semiconductor feature size continues to make remarkable strides, batteries continue to be the limiting factor in most portable technologies. From all the photos I've seen of these proclaimed circuits, they are indistinguishable from ordinary salt crystals and debris to my eye.
Good point, there is a distinction I failed to make between "self-assembling" and circuitry or machinery. Cholesterols are fascinating, their crystalline structures are the basis of one class of color changing thermochromic materials.
Yes, there is all that. and others have said that it is poisoning the well, and controlling the opposition, throwing up smoke and mirrors, though it's not something the "system" would have done I would have thought.
There is this website... http://lifeoftheblood.com/videos/ which has more than that salt crystals. The lab involved did a lot of controls first, before they looked at anything, and when the Ministry of Health was confronted with more than is on their page, their reply was that these images were made using art and video programs to make fake film.
In terms of practicalities, the core mission has always been to work out what is in the vaccines which will directly affect cellular metabolism and immune function. So Anandamine's work is the most important clinically.
I think the base issue is simply contamination with graphene that is used for filtration I believe . I know in other nano tech it is used and it may likely be used in the development of these vaccines and simply be contaminated with graphene particles . The question is what effects can this have on the body ?
As far as I know, she can just look into the vials under microscope or darkfield microscope. Which are basic equipments they definitely have access to.
"She" is a he. Given that his field is genomics, why would he? That's not relevant to what he does.
And when it comes to microscopy, there are plenty of other people who have extensively reported what they think they have seen. What is being done here, is totally different requirements and study.
So you are saying their lab doesn't care if those videos and reports about the nano circuits inside the jabs are true or not, and have no interest to tell people the truth despite they are fully capable of doing so? All they have to do is just take some drops from the vial then put it under the microscope for a look, as simple as that.
Many reports claimed that they observed those nano-objects to be "self-assembling" when they move intelligently under microscope, also the pictures like these http://lifeoftheblood.com/videos/ look nothing like simple crystals, they came in various different geometric shapes including chips, wires, rectangles, and were also "glowing" under darkfield when react to 5g and magnetic waves.
This is out of my field and I have no direct application for the information, but I am familiar with the basics of qPCR and primers and this fills in a good many more details about processes and answers a number of my questions. Thank you!
Thank you for this extensive info! Didn't do any lab work in this field for decades, so bare with this question... Why don't you probe that section of Spike which was modified for the production of the injections? That would be the section further down at the:
961 tlvkqlssnf gaissvlndi lsrld->kv<-eae in which kv was replaced with the FOURTH PP=Pro-Pro, very hard to digest..... And the connecting question, would you be able this way to distinguish who carries the injections Spikes and who the 'natural' version only?...
And for how many circles are you running the qPCR?
Thank you for this work, Kevin, you're a legend, and as I've said previously, this is probably the most important research carried out since the pandemic began. I have two comments:
1) As a matter of urgency, you’re results need independent verification from labs around the World. You have provided the tools, so let’s hope other researchers can bravely step up and carry the torch. I believe corroboration from a few labs would have profound and far-reaching consequence for the manufacturers, the Regulators, Government and ultimately the global population.
2) You have performed this work, almost singlehandedly, using your own time and funds, and in a relatively short period of time. This begs the question, why on Earth did the manufacturers, with unlimited resources and funding, not do the same? The only hypothesis I can come up with, is the manufacturers did this work, but realising their products were garbage, they chose instead to develop a bunch of second-rate proxy tests for their products, and then convinced Regulatory authorities these tests were the “gold standard”. The rest, as they say, is history..
Thank you for sharing Ana. Since you have done testing on the actual Pfizer/Moderna vials for the DNA contamination, did you also find graphene oxidie or any self-assembly circuits inside the vials?
I'm not a microbiologist or anything, but this business with the self-assembling nanotechnology, bluetooth MACs and even the graphene oxide sound like "poisoning the well" to me. It's probably a given that there are technologies which TPTB conceal from us which are advanced beyond the current known state of the art, but self-assembling nanotechnology is not likely to be one of them. Setting aside the problem of how these tiny machines would harvest and manipulate the raw materials they'd need to replicate, there is the issue of the power source. While semiconductor feature size continues to make remarkable strides, batteries continue to be the limiting factor in most portable technologies. From all the photos I've seen of these proclaimed circuits, they are indistinguishable from ordinary salt crystals and debris to my eye.
Or cholesterol crystals - which is more likely, given that there are LNPs.
An LNP expert (Heart of Grace) has indicated that in the presence of ethanol, LNPs can self-assemble.
There'd be a pretty high burden of proof to establish nanocircuitry - I remain unconvinced.
Good point, there is a distinction I failed to make between "self-assembling" and circuitry or machinery. Cholesterols are fascinating, their crystalline structures are the basis of one class of color changing thermochromic materials.
Yes, there is all that. and others have said that it is poisoning the well, and controlling the opposition, throwing up smoke and mirrors, though it's not something the "system" would have done I would have thought.
There is this website... http://lifeoftheblood.com/videos/ which has more than that salt crystals. The lab involved did a lot of controls first, before they looked at anything, and when the Ministry of Health was confronted with more than is on their page, their reply was that these images were made using art and video programs to make fake film.
In terms of practicalities, the core mission has always been to work out what is in the vaccines which will directly affect cellular metabolism and immune function. So Anandamine's work is the most important clinically.
I think the base issue is simply contamination with graphene that is used for filtration I believe . I know in other nano tech it is used and it may likely be used in the development of these vaccines and simply be contaminated with graphene particles . The question is what effects can this have on the body ?
How would anything like that be found using tests looking for SARS DNA or RNA?
As far as I know, she can just look into the vials under microscope or darkfield microscope. Which are basic equipments they definitely have access to.
"She" is a he. Given that his field is genomics, why would he? That's not relevant to what he does.
And when it comes to microscopy, there are plenty of other people who have extensively reported what they think they have seen. What is being done here, is totally different requirements and study.
So you are saying their lab doesn't care if those videos and reports about the nano circuits inside the jabs are true or not, and have no interest to tell people the truth despite they are fully capable of doing so? All they have to do is just take some drops from the vial then put it under the microscope for a look, as simple as that.
Nope. It isn't.
There are a number of things that can look like square crystals under a light microscope. You'd need to run mass spec to be certain of what you have.
Many reports claimed that they observed those nano-objects to be "self-assembling" when they move intelligently under microscope, also the pictures like these http://lifeoftheblood.com/videos/ look nothing like simple crystals, they came in various different geometric shapes including chips, wires, rectangles, and were also "glowing" under darkfield when react to 5g and magnetic waves.
I can propose you to read my revision of some papers about the presumed presence of GO inside the mRNA vaccines.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377411383_REVIEW_ON_ANALYTICAL_METHODS_FOR_THE_CHARACTERIZATION_OF_GRAPHENE_STRUCTURES_AND_TOXICITY_PROFILES
This is out of my field and I have no direct application for the information, but I am familiar with the basics of qPCR and primers and this fills in a good many more details about processes and answers a number of my questions. Thank you!
Thank you for this extensive info! Didn't do any lab work in this field for decades, so bare with this question... Why don't you probe that section of Spike which was modified for the production of the injections? That would be the section further down at the:
961 tlvkqlssnf gaissvlndi lsrld->kv<-eae in which kv was replaced with the FOURTH PP=Pro-Pro, very hard to digest..... And the connecting question, would you be able this way to distinguish who carries the injections Spikes and who the 'natural' version only?...
And for how many circles are you running the qPCR?
THANK YOU in advance for any response.
Great job on this! I can't wait to see other labs repeating the work.
Thank you for this work, Kevin, you're a legend, and as I've said previously, this is probably the most important research carried out since the pandemic began. I have two comments:
1) As a matter of urgency, you’re results need independent verification from labs around the World. You have provided the tools, so let’s hope other researchers can bravely step up and carry the torch. I believe corroboration from a few labs would have profound and far-reaching consequence for the manufacturers, the Regulators, Government and ultimately the global population.
2) You have performed this work, almost singlehandedly, using your own time and funds, and in a relatively short period of time. This begs the question, why on Earth did the manufacturers, with unlimited resources and funding, not do the same? The only hypothesis I can come up with, is the manufacturers did this work, but realising their products were garbage, they chose instead to develop a bunch of second-rate proxy tests for their products, and then convinced Regulatory authorities these tests were the “gold standard”. The rest, as they say, is history..
Thank you
I've seen the videos.
I've also seen microscopy with similar appearance that upon chemical analysis with mass spec did not reveal the presence of graphene.
Are these PCR good for all the covid mRNA vaccines?
The abstract states what they are good for.