These qPCR primer sets have been screened against Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen vaccines. The Spike assay is positive on all 3 vaccines. The Vector Origin primers amplify Pfizer and Moderna equally but have a ~10CT delay with Janssen (Different adenovirus vector).
Thank you for sharing Ana. Since you have done testing on the actual Pfizer/Moderna vials for the DNA contamination, did you also find graphene oxidie or any self-assembly circuits inside the vials?
This is out of my field and I have no direct application for the information, but I am familiar with the basics of qPCR and primers and this fills in a good many more details about processes and answers a number of my questions. Thank you!
Thank you for this extensive info! Didn't do any lab work in this field for decades, so bare with this question... Why don't you probe that section of Spike which was modified for the production of the injections? That would be the section further down at the:
961 tlvkqlssnf gaissvlndi lsrld->kv<-eae in which kv was replaced with the FOURTH PP=Pro-Pro, very hard to digest..... And the connecting question, would you be able this way to distinguish who carries the injections Spikes and who the 'natural' version only?...
And for how many circles are you running the qPCR?
Thank you for this work, Kevin, you're a legend, and as I've said previously, this is probably the most important research carried out since the pandemic began. I have two comments:
1) As a matter of urgency, you’re results need independent verification from labs around the World. You have provided the tools, so let’s hope other researchers can bravely step up and carry the torch. I believe corroboration from a few labs would have profound and far-reaching consequence for the manufacturers, the Regulators, Government and ultimately the global population.
2) You have performed this work, almost singlehandedly, using your own time and funds, and in a relatively short period of time. This begs the question, why on Earth did the manufacturers, with unlimited resources and funding, not do the same? The only hypothesis I can come up with, is the manufacturers did this work, but realising their products were garbage, they chose instead to develop a bunch of second-rate proxy tests for their products, and then convinced Regulatory authorities these tests were the “gold standard”. The rest, as they say, is history..
Thank you for sharing Ana. Since you have done testing on the actual Pfizer/Moderna vials for the DNA contamination, did you also find graphene oxidie or any self-assembly circuits inside the vials?
This is out of my field and I have no direct application for the information, but I am familiar with the basics of qPCR and primers and this fills in a good many more details about processes and answers a number of my questions. Thank you!
Thank you for this extensive info! Didn't do any lab work in this field for decades, so bare with this question... Why don't you probe that section of Spike which was modified for the production of the injections? That would be the section further down at the:
961 tlvkqlssnf gaissvlndi lsrld->kv<-eae in which kv was replaced with the FOURTH PP=Pro-Pro, very hard to digest..... And the connecting question, would you be able this way to distinguish who carries the injections Spikes and who the 'natural' version only?...
And for how many circles are you running the qPCR?
THANK YOU in advance for any response.
Great job on this! I can't wait to see other labs repeating the work.
Thank you for this work, Kevin, you're a legend, and as I've said previously, this is probably the most important research carried out since the pandemic began. I have two comments:
1) As a matter of urgency, you’re results need independent verification from labs around the World. You have provided the tools, so let’s hope other researchers can bravely step up and carry the torch. I believe corroboration from a few labs would have profound and far-reaching consequence for the manufacturers, the Regulators, Government and ultimately the global population.
2) You have performed this work, almost singlehandedly, using your own time and funds, and in a relatively short period of time. This begs the question, why on Earth did the manufacturers, with unlimited resources and funding, not do the same? The only hypothesis I can come up with, is the manufacturers did this work, but realising their products were garbage, they chose instead to develop a bunch of second-rate proxy tests for their products, and then convinced Regulatory authorities these tests were the “gold standard”. The rest, as they say, is history..
Thank you
I've seen the videos.
I've also seen microscopy with similar appearance that upon chemical analysis with mass spec did not reveal the presence of graphene.
Are these PCR good for all the covid mRNA vaccines?