The irony is that truth censoring has always existed. Some of that came out in Nicolas Wade's "science" articles relating to corruption in the DBS, Thalidomide, the use of DES in animals etc, but from your point of view one of the most applicable one, was what the DBS (Division of Biological Standards) which used to be part of the NIH, did (or didn't do) and their capture by the vaccine companies way back in the 50's. Nothing has changed.
Being a geriatric, my institutional knowledge goes back to then because after Dr J.A.Morris (Tony to me) was fired twice, once from DBS and again from FDA after accurately stating the dangerous outcomes for ordinary influenza, measles and the 1976 Swine flu vaccine, I worked with him from 1984 when he had established an organisation called "The Bell of Atri" (after the famour Wadsworth poem) at Maryland University.
Which lead me to Bernice Eddy who was still alive, but who gradually succumbed to Parkinsons.
Tony gave her obituary at her funeral in 1989, and described her work from the mid 50s in trying to figure out why the polio vaccine cultures in the absence of poliovirus, degenerated spontaneously, no matter how carefully they were looked after, and as we know, what she found was SV40 .
Tony read this from his obituary paper, " So there was a time in 1959, 1960 and 1961, when government health officials were frantically seeking means of removal from a tumor-inducing factor from polio vaccines and at the same time the same government health officials were vigorously conducting a campaign to inject contaminated polio vaccines in large numbers of people and concurrently sitting on information concerning a vaccine contaminant which had already been injected into millions.
"Can this event be assigned to the category of an interesting historical footnote? The answer is no."
There is much more that could be said, but this smidgen from a mountain of information, just confirms that the modus operandi of the regulatory agencies is on a rinse repeat continuous cycle.
Thanks for this insightful article Kevin. Evil and greed have a strong grip on humanity these days and only brave, intelligent people like yourself can keep it at bay!
In a world that is increasingly irradiating itself with cell phones, and men become infertile and more estrogen-dominant with gmo, soy,etc, introducing cannabis (has feminine quality) will make men superwomen, and not in a good way (in my humble opinion)
And what I learned from my humble teacher Vithoulkas in classical homeopathy, not only the far most remedy in delusions, but also a strong predisposition to uro-genital infections, cystitis, vaginitis, urethritis, gonorrhoea, Candida Albicans, Chlamydia, and other creepy things.
Hoffer treated schizophrenia with very high dose niacin. The industry did not seem pleased. Niacin got (mostly) Ivermectined. "Anecdotes!" they whined. Interesting about schizophrenics being attracted to THC.
According to Peter Götzsche ex Cochrane collaboration and his not bought science, schizophrenia is a milk cow, not a chemical imbalance in the brain nor genetic, at the most very down and frustrating life experiences, which gives a wild card to open the gates to hell, and all schizo psychotics are as good as idiopathic, meaning they cause hell.
Tying the two together i was on a clubhouse discussion in the summer of 2020 with some growers where one phd guy was saying that it blocks ace2 receptors. And google scholared and found some credible studies in the direction of using cannabis for covid. But i guess it got ivermectined. Having quality ethanol extracted on hand i vouche to say, when i started having cytokine storm symptoms i went cancer dose , and within 12 hrs was a noticeable difference
Ivermectin was already FDA approved and cheap, so governments couldn't grab big tax money from it. Cannabis is such a direct and ginormous tax collection possibility for governments.
This leads me to believe that the cannabis approach will be different than with ivermectin.
Cannabis is a complicated issue because of the variable ingredients, and the fact that it affects performance, and so many bodily systems. And it's a weed!
That being said, it is a safer option for people with intractable pain, and I can't argue against that kind of usage.
The hyperemesis patients in the ED are in a world of hurt though.
While I really appreciate your posts, this one exposes you are not a clinician.
If you were, I’d likely know that America is addicted to drugs. Don’t follow Trump’s idea that if you eliminate the source, whatever it is, the intake will go into detox. You are not a stupid man, if there were not intakes in America, would phenomenal, or any other drug, have a market?
There are people with very specific genetic mutations that should make them susceptible to very specific diseases or disorders. Why don’t they ever develop them? What makes them so ‘unique’?
Do you think male pattern baldness is a genetic disorder? If so, would you agree that genetically “identical” twins should either develop pattern baldness, or not?
Clinicians were falling over themselves to abrogate their Physicians' Oath to make us take a vaccine. I recently had an argument with a clinician who was adamant that ondansetron wasn't a serotonin inhibitor. I think clinicians are done here, and they should lay down in the muck until they re-educate themselves instead of relying on outdated textbooks and The Vibe.
The irony is that truth censoring has always existed. Some of that came out in Nicolas Wade's "science" articles relating to corruption in the DBS, Thalidomide, the use of DES in animals etc, but from your point of view one of the most applicable one, was what the DBS (Division of Biological Standards) which used to be part of the NIH, did (or didn't do) and their capture by the vaccine companies way back in the 50's. Nothing has changed.
Being a geriatric, my institutional knowledge goes back to then because after Dr J.A.Morris (Tony to me) was fired twice, once from DBS and again from FDA after accurately stating the dangerous outcomes for ordinary influenza, measles and the 1976 Swine flu vaccine, I worked with him from 1984 when he had established an organisation called "The Bell of Atri" (after the famour Wadsworth poem) at Maryland University.
Which lead me to Bernice Eddy who was still alive, but who gradually succumbed to Parkinsons.
Tony gave her obituary at her funeral in 1989, and described her work from the mid 50s in trying to figure out why the polio vaccine cultures in the absence of poliovirus, degenerated spontaneously, no matter how carefully they were looked after, and as we know, what she found was SV40 .
Tony read this from his obituary paper, " So there was a time in 1959, 1960 and 1961, when government health officials were frantically seeking means of removal from a tumor-inducing factor from polio vaccines and at the same time the same government health officials were vigorously conducting a campaign to inject contaminated polio vaccines in large numbers of people and concurrently sitting on information concerning a vaccine contaminant which had already been injected into millions.
"Can this event be assigned to the category of an interesting historical footnote? The answer is no."
There is much more that could be said, but this smidgen from a mountain of information, just confirms that the modus operandi of the regulatory agencies is on a rinse repeat continuous cycle.
Thanks for this insightful article Kevin. Evil and greed have a strong grip on humanity these days and only brave, intelligent people like yourself can keep it at bay!
In a world that is increasingly irradiating itself with cell phones, and men become infertile and more estrogen-dominant with gmo, soy,etc, introducing cannabis (has feminine quality) will make men superwomen, and not in a good way (in my humble opinion)
Very wise comment.
And what I learned from my humble teacher Vithoulkas in classical homeopathy, not only the far most remedy in delusions, but also a strong predisposition to uro-genital infections, cystitis, vaginitis, urethritis, gonorrhoea, Candida Albicans, Chlamydia, and other creepy things.
Check out the next Fentanyl, biosynthetic freeze dried Cone Snail Venom.
Can I take it with my sashimi'd blue ring octopus?
Yikes! Might be more like the puffer fish!
Hoffer treated schizophrenia with very high dose niacin. The industry did not seem pleased. Niacin got (mostly) Ivermectined. "Anecdotes!" they whined. Interesting about schizophrenics being attracted to THC.
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/drugs-health-history-you-asked/niacin-possible-successful-treatment-schizophrenia
According to Peter Götzsche ex Cochrane collaboration and his not bought science, schizophrenia is a milk cow, not a chemical imbalance in the brain nor genetic, at the most very down and frustrating life experiences, which gives a wild card to open the gates to hell, and all schizo psychotics are as good as idiopathic, meaning they cause hell.
Wow…..and it had already begun.
Thankfully here in Canada we can buy weed or it’s derivatives (capsules, edibles, drinks) with regulated THC and CBD content.
Personally I find a 10:10 capsule to be about right (10mg THC 10mg CBD)….I actually can’t stand the smell of weed especially the chronic.
https://open.substack.com/pub/sensiblemed/p/recent-news-headlines-infer-that?r=3eag9y&utm_medium=ios
Tying the two together i was on a clubhouse discussion in the summer of 2020 with some growers where one phd guy was saying that it blocks ace2 receptors. And google scholared and found some credible studies in the direction of using cannabis for covid. But i guess it got ivermectined. Having quality ethanol extracted on hand i vouche to say, when i started having cytokine storm symptoms i went cancer dose , and within 12 hrs was a noticeable difference
Ivermectin was already FDA approved and cheap, so governments couldn't grab big tax money from it. Cannabis is such a direct and ginormous tax collection possibility for governments.
This leads me to believe that the cannabis approach will be different than with ivermectin.
Cannabis is a complicated issue because of the variable ingredients, and the fact that it affects performance, and so many bodily systems. And it's a weed!
That being said, it is a safer option for people with intractable pain, and I can't argue against that kind of usage.
The hyperemesis patients in the ED are in a world of hurt though.
Kevin,
While I really appreciate your posts, this one exposes you are not a clinician.
If you were, I’d likely know that America is addicted to drugs. Don’t follow Trump’s idea that if you eliminate the source, whatever it is, the intake will go into detox. You are not a stupid man, if there were not intakes in America, would phenomenal, or any other drug, have a market?
I’m not certain I follow your reasoning.
There are people with mutations in their Cannabinoid receptors.
I think any puritanical definition of drug use is outdated.
I’ve seen people completely turn around on these and until you walk 1000 miles in their genetic shoes, you can’t claim what is best for them.
MD or no MD.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187926
You are not unlikely following my reasoning…
There are people with very specific genetic mutations that should make them susceptible to very specific diseases or disorders. Why don’t they ever develop them? What makes them so ‘unique’?
Do you think male pattern baldness is a genetic disorder? If so, would you agree that genetically “identical” twins should either develop pattern baldness, or not?
This is just a clue…
Clinicians were falling over themselves to abrogate their Physicians' Oath to make us take a vaccine. I recently had an argument with a clinician who was adamant that ondansetron wasn't a serotonin inhibitor. I think clinicians are done here, and they should lay down in the muck until they re-educate themselves instead of relying on outdated textbooks and The Vibe.
What? Are you responding to my comment or Kevin’s?
Clearly, the way things are organised on the site, I am responding directly to you.