All I'll say is my GP Surgery staff got uniformly sick starting the second week of March 2020 and it clearly was not a regular flu (neurological symptoms like losing the perception of breathing whilst actually breathing causing panic). I myself had very mild symptoms but they were also weird (nothing until the evening, then the feeling that my lungs were filled with trash).
Three got long Covid (never-vaxxed). Two younger women in their 30s have clearly developed auto-immune conditions that pre-date 2020 and go back to respiratory viral infections in December 2019. A friend nearly died with something similar in 2019, and a relative developed recurrent viral disease (including Covid) again since 2019.
So I'm convinced that Sars-Cov-2 exists, was a bio-weapon; was around before 2020 (the lack of illness in 2020 in some geographic regions suggests an Omicron predecessor providing protection to people in those regions); and that the scum that engineered it for profit, control and humanity-destroying motives must themselves be destroyed via a judicial crimes-against-humanity proceeding.
Great article. I have been a big fan of Nick's / Panda's work but I like your explanation more. There was something moving through the world in 2020. I saw it affect my family and myself to varying degrees (minor) but also lost a few friends and some had close calls (no early treatment/ wrong early treatment). And I'd like to think I'm reasonably smart and open minded. Your essay fits my thinking on this perfectly. There was a thing. Mostly not too bad of a thing but for some it was devastating and I have sympathy with that as they were my friends. I am angry that they didn't get better information or treatment (one was blue before his wife called an ambulance). I am also very angry that governments provably caused more deaths due to over inflating numbers, paying for gain of function work, lying about origins, lying about vaccines.....lying about everything really. There wasn't a real pandemic on paper, Nick is right there. But there was most certainly 'something' and government and the masses "living the pandemic" made it all so much worse. We need to acknowledge this. No amount of actuarial proof takes away everyone's lived experience of it. It's only part of the overall puzzle and I'm grateful you've managed to build up more of that puzzle with the work you guys are doing. Nick if you read this, intellectually I can agree with your points completely and I know how much work has gone into it but there's a piece missing....🙏
This is probably the best, most cogent, and most uplifting Covid article that I have read since this whole nightmare began. Thank you Kevin! I’ve been intently watching from the sidelines since the very beginning of the C19 mess(as I felt instinctively something was amiss), trying to understand the genesis and implications of all that has unfolded over the last several years. I’ve been an admirer of those courageous few that have emerged as thought leaders against the official narrative and their efforts to inform and educate. Those leaders (yourself included in the forefront, Kevin) that have acted as voices for us voiceless in the fight for truth and medical freedom — and against the tyranny that was foisted upon us — have my eternal gratitude.
Of late, it has been distressing for me to see so many of the incredibly intelligent,dedicated, and experienced individuals contributing to this fight begin to squabble about who was first to see this or that and who is the “most“ correct. You summed this up so eloquently and considerately in your article. It would’ve been easier for you to point your shotgun and pull the trigger, but you painted an incredibly cogent picture. Hopefully all of the wonderful and intelligent freedom fighters will take your message to heart and reconsider their unproductive participation in the Spiderman meme. There is so much more to be accomplished and you expressed many salient points that I hope will be seriously considered by those in this important community going forward.
I was tremendously moved by this article. You’ve given me great hope by 1) explaining the “smoking gun“ conclusion and 2) outlining a path forward to work together so that we can rally the "normies" & "side liners" like myself to snuff out any nefarious pandemic preparedness operations and be prepared to drive back any future tyrannical advances made in the name of global health or other Trojan horses. Many things to you for this fantastic Article!
Kevin McKernan, of the guys with the greatest understanding of this COVID debacle is hanging out here at SubStack, exhorting all those who are discovering and uncovering the truths and crimes to AVOID forming a circular firing squad. And he presents super strong evidence that SARS CoV2 has artificial (man made) genome elements.
Thank you for these thoughts. To grasp what is going on, it is necessary to juggle many topics at the same time; we need people digging as deep as they can regarding a singular topic and at the same time media ambiguity tolerance and decentralisation of focus that enables all relevant topics to unfold on a level playing field for NPCs like myself. People holding the view that one has to »put all wood behind one arrow« are still embedded in legacy media thinking that can only feature on one hot topic at the time.
The following quote captures this nicely: »So I support the people chipping away at the GOF recklessness as much as I support those trying to end the Pandemic Preparedness narrative as much as I support frontline physicians and vax contamination investigations as much as I support those chipping away at the free speech violations that enabled all of this hoodwinking.«
I did explain to Nick that attacking those on broadly the same page with the "no pandemic" line was likely counter productive. I also explained that our problem is not one of definitions / semantics but one of captured institutions and corrupt individuals.
So many confused people trying to outdo each other in cleverness. The proof of lab release seems irrefutable at this point.
S2 induces a significantly higher rate of myocarditis than any other flu and will probably cause turbo cancers, prions, and other issues over time. It was novel, as McCullough and the VAERS data said early on.
It was a pandemic according to the definition. Just because S2 has a low proximate IFR, doesn't mean it can't qualify.
I really don't know what the no virus/no pandemic crowd are trying to prove. That the vaxxes and NPIs caused all the problems? Why leave out the virus and the fabricated-but-real pandemic?
They were all the work of the same evil people who are trying to take over the world.
Great article Kevin. I am of the opinion that an all hands on deck approach to expose the entire covid catastrophe is appropriate. IMO the web of lies will be exposed in it's entirely over this year to the general public. I think the biggest horrifying scandal is this; they (*allegedly)let people die. I cannot express my gratitude for your work and more importantly your voice. Thank you Kevin.
I know many good people that truly believe the lockdowns, mandates and unscientific mitigation measures were justified, I lost many family and personal relationships trying to show them their hypocrisy and illogical rationale to no avail. They don't see the big picture and they likely never will. I certainly don't understand how they can be so blind and have lost some respect for them but I don't think their bad judgment makes them bad people.
Thoughtful post. I hope folks can agree to disagree and stop the splintering. One thing I will say, though, is that there’s money for some of the big names in the early treatment/vitamin detox group, so there is an element of protecting their rice bowl and I think that’s why this schism is getting particularly nasty. Blessed are the peacemakers.
I find it most irritating when astroturfers comment “Covid doesn’t exist” or “there was no pandemic” under posts that of themselves are unrelated. Eg: demonstrating that the government was caught in a cover up, or revealing the extent of foul play over blocking medications (whether or not you think they were necessary), or lockdown and masking policies etc.
In most cases, it undermines the important point being made, and simply creates chaos and division - even if the commenter believes they’re right, even if they ARE right.
I think we need to get better, as a community, at focusing on what we agree on and picking and choosing time and place for voicing disagreements - which are good and welcome, but unhelpful when aggressively sprayed in comments under posts to which there is no relevant link. Not talking about Nick Hudson, like you I respect him and he is not who I’m thinking of with the astroturfing behaviour.
Thanks for pointing out the RE paper. I remember seeing a couple years back a study that did something like a power analysis that considered all REs, showing that it was engineered. Do you know of this paper? (or maybe it was not allowed into a journal at the time, but I cannot find it).
Tell the 96% of this year's Argentinian elephant seal pups, who just died of H5N1, that pandemics aren't a real threat. Virologist Robert Webster warned in 2005 that with some adaptation mutations it could potentially kill half the human race (https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/AvianFlu/story?id=1724801). And don't forget to keep ignorning Geert Vanden Bossche and the people who take him seriously (https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/potential-clinical-implications-of), no discussion of his analysis is needed.
Tremendous write-up - Bravo!
All I'll say is my GP Surgery staff got uniformly sick starting the second week of March 2020 and it clearly was not a regular flu (neurological symptoms like losing the perception of breathing whilst actually breathing causing panic). I myself had very mild symptoms but they were also weird (nothing until the evening, then the feeling that my lungs were filled with trash).
Three got long Covid (never-vaxxed). Two younger women in their 30s have clearly developed auto-immune conditions that pre-date 2020 and go back to respiratory viral infections in December 2019. A friend nearly died with something similar in 2019, and a relative developed recurrent viral disease (including Covid) again since 2019.
So I'm convinced that Sars-Cov-2 exists, was a bio-weapon; was around before 2020 (the lack of illness in 2020 in some geographic regions suggests an Omicron predecessor providing protection to people in those regions); and that the scum that engineered it for profit, control and humanity-destroying motives must themselves be destroyed via a judicial crimes-against-humanity proceeding.
Great article. I have been a big fan of Nick's / Panda's work but I like your explanation more. There was something moving through the world in 2020. I saw it affect my family and myself to varying degrees (minor) but also lost a few friends and some had close calls (no early treatment/ wrong early treatment). And I'd like to think I'm reasonably smart and open minded. Your essay fits my thinking on this perfectly. There was a thing. Mostly not too bad of a thing but for some it was devastating and I have sympathy with that as they were my friends. I am angry that they didn't get better information or treatment (one was blue before his wife called an ambulance). I am also very angry that governments provably caused more deaths due to over inflating numbers, paying for gain of function work, lying about origins, lying about vaccines.....lying about everything really. There wasn't a real pandemic on paper, Nick is right there. But there was most certainly 'something' and government and the masses "living the pandemic" made it all so much worse. We need to acknowledge this. No amount of actuarial proof takes away everyone's lived experience of it. It's only part of the overall puzzle and I'm grateful you've managed to build up more of that puzzle with the work you guys are doing. Nick if you read this, intellectually I can agree with your points completely and I know how much work has gone into it but there's a piece missing....🙏
This is probably the best, most cogent, and most uplifting Covid article that I have read since this whole nightmare began. Thank you Kevin! I’ve been intently watching from the sidelines since the very beginning of the C19 mess(as I felt instinctively something was amiss), trying to understand the genesis and implications of all that has unfolded over the last several years. I’ve been an admirer of those courageous few that have emerged as thought leaders against the official narrative and their efforts to inform and educate. Those leaders (yourself included in the forefront, Kevin) that have acted as voices for us voiceless in the fight for truth and medical freedom — and against the tyranny that was foisted upon us — have my eternal gratitude.
Of late, it has been distressing for me to see so many of the incredibly intelligent,dedicated, and experienced individuals contributing to this fight begin to squabble about who was first to see this or that and who is the “most“ correct. You summed this up so eloquently and considerately in your article. It would’ve been easier for you to point your shotgun and pull the trigger, but you painted an incredibly cogent picture. Hopefully all of the wonderful and intelligent freedom fighters will take your message to heart and reconsider their unproductive participation in the Spiderman meme. There is so much more to be accomplished and you expressed many salient points that I hope will be seriously considered by those in this important community going forward.
I was tremendously moved by this article. You’ve given me great hope by 1) explaining the “smoking gun“ conclusion and 2) outlining a path forward to work together so that we can rally the "normies" & "side liners" like myself to snuff out any nefarious pandemic preparedness operations and be prepared to drive back any future tyrannical advances made in the name of global health or other Trojan horses. Many things to you for this fantastic Article!
Kevin McKernan, of the guys with the greatest understanding of this COVID debacle is hanging out here at SubStack, exhorting all those who are discovering and uncovering the truths and crimes to AVOID forming a circular firing squad. And he presents super strong evidence that SARS CoV2 has artificial (man made) genome elements.
Thank you for these thoughts. To grasp what is going on, it is necessary to juggle many topics at the same time; we need people digging as deep as they can regarding a singular topic and at the same time media ambiguity tolerance and decentralisation of focus that enables all relevant topics to unfold on a level playing field for NPCs like myself. People holding the view that one has to »put all wood behind one arrow« are still embedded in legacy media thinking that can only feature on one hot topic at the time.
The following quote captures this nicely: »So I support the people chipping away at the GOF recklessness as much as I support those trying to end the Pandemic Preparedness narrative as much as I support frontline physicians and vax contamination investigations as much as I support those chipping away at the free speech violations that enabled all of this hoodwinking.«
Only one thing seems to be certain almost 100% of the time:
Divide and Conquer.
A huge dose of humility and kindness and attempts to listen and heal seem badly needed. Thank you for your clarity
Bang on the money Kevin as usual.
I did explain to Nick that attacking those on broadly the same page with the "no pandemic" line was likely counter productive. I also explained that our problem is not one of definitions / semantics but one of captured institutions and corrupt individuals.
So many confused people trying to outdo each other in cleverness. The proof of lab release seems irrefutable at this point.
S2 induces a significantly higher rate of myocarditis than any other flu and will probably cause turbo cancers, prions, and other issues over time. It was novel, as McCullough and the VAERS data said early on.
It was a pandemic according to the definition. Just because S2 has a low proximate IFR, doesn't mean it can't qualify.
I really don't know what the no virus/no pandemic crowd are trying to prove. That the vaxxes and NPIs caused all the problems? Why leave out the virus and the fabricated-but-real pandemic?
They were all the work of the same evil people who are trying to take over the world.
Thank you for this stance. I have been increasingly distressed by the fragmentation and name-calling of late. It does not move the ball forward.
Great article Kevin. I am of the opinion that an all hands on deck approach to expose the entire covid catastrophe is appropriate. IMO the web of lies will be exposed in it's entirely over this year to the general public. I think the biggest horrifying scandal is this; they (*allegedly)let people die. I cannot express my gratitude for your work and more importantly your voice. Thank you Kevin.
I know many good people that truly believe the lockdowns, mandates and unscientific mitigation measures were justified, I lost many family and personal relationships trying to show them their hypocrisy and illogical rationale to no avail. They don't see the big picture and they likely never will. I certainly don't understand how they can be so blind and have lost some respect for them but I don't think their bad judgment makes them bad people.
Thoughtful post. I hope folks can agree to disagree and stop the splintering. One thing I will say, though, is that there’s money for some of the big names in the early treatment/vitamin detox group, so there is an element of protecting their rice bowl and I think that’s why this schism is getting particularly nasty. Blessed are the peacemakers.
I find it most irritating when astroturfers comment “Covid doesn’t exist” or “there was no pandemic” under posts that of themselves are unrelated. Eg: demonstrating that the government was caught in a cover up, or revealing the extent of foul play over blocking medications (whether or not you think they were necessary), or lockdown and masking policies etc.
In most cases, it undermines the important point being made, and simply creates chaos and division - even if the commenter believes they’re right, even if they ARE right.
I think we need to get better, as a community, at focusing on what we agree on and picking and choosing time and place for voicing disagreements - which are good and welcome, but unhelpful when aggressively sprayed in comments under posts to which there is no relevant link. Not talking about Nick Hudson, like you I respect him and he is not who I’m thinking of with the astroturfing behaviour.
Dr. McKernan, are you referring to this article by Emily Kopp (U.S. Right to Know)?
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/
Thanks for pointing out the RE paper. I remember seeing a couple years back a study that did something like a power analysis that considered all REs, showing that it was engineered. Do you know of this paper? (or maybe it was not allowed into a journal at the time, but I cannot find it).
Tell the 96% of this year's Argentinian elephant seal pups, who just died of H5N1, that pandemics aren't a real threat. Virologist Robert Webster warned in 2005 that with some adaptation mutations it could potentially kill half the human race (https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/AvianFlu/story?id=1724801). And don't forget to keep ignorning Geert Vanden Bossche and the people who take him seriously (https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/p/potential-clinical-implications-of), no discussion of his analysis is needed.