Preamble
Filippo Brunelleschi won the contract to build the Dome on the Duomo without showing any blueprints or plans. It is rumored he burned his blueprints to prevent competitors from emulating his work. His design stood the test of time and only 1 carpenter died in the construction of the Dome. Modern vaccine manufacturers have also tried to hide their blueprints less successfully than Brunelleschi. In fact, they packaged them accidentally in every vial produced. The death toll for their products remains as one of the highest on record for any vaccine
.
Abstract
We utilized previously described boil preps and qPCR to assess the contamination levels in Pfizer’s monovalent vaccines. Contamination levels are as significant as the bivalent vaccines and have reached many more people.
Introduction
Bivalent vaccine uptake is significantly reduced compared to the monovalent vaccines. This leads one to question if the previously described dsDNA contamination in the bivalent vaccines also exists in the monovalent vaccines.
Methods
Vials were unopened and dated from 3/4/2022. The instructions call for dilution prior to use based on the age of the patient. The orange cap tubes are specific for 5-12 year olds. The label claims, after dilution with 1.3ml of saline there should be ten 200ul doses so ~700ul of vaccine exist in the vial prior to dilution. qPCR boil preps were performed without dilution. The minor dilution would only move the qPCR results 1-2 CTs. The PCR methods used for this study are described previously. The boil method used in this study is described previously.
Results
qPCR only amplifies DNA and shows equal CTs (22) for the spike and vector sequences.
RT-qPCR amplifies both DNA and RNA shows a shifted CT for the vector (CT 22→19). This implies there is some vector RNA or the 10 minute RT step used to turn DNA into RNA is enhancing the RT-qPCR signal for all targets. Given the Plasmid DNA is isolated from E.coli with methods that likely eliminate RNA with RNases, it is more likely the CT offset is a result of the RT step in RT-qPCR.
Replicated from our previous study on the bivalent vaccines. These results in Figure 3 (on the left DNase I ) chart were generated using a different DNA prep and dilution than the boil prep used in this study. They were also from vials that did not have any dilution instructions so the CTs are delayed compared to the monovalent vaccines as expected. The CT offset on the DNase I chart (on the left ) with the Pfizer untreated Spike (blue) and Origin (green) appears to be about 5-7 CTs.
Conclusions
Our first survey of Pfizer monovalent vaccines implies the contamination is also present in these widely distributed vaccines and even the vaccines targeting 5-12 year olds. Preliminary assessments of the CT offset between the Spike RT-qPCR and the Vector RT-qPCR demonstrates a 7 CT offset which equates to a 128 fold difference (2^7) between the spike nucleic acids and the vector nucleic acids. The vector should be predominantly DNA as the techniques used to isolate the plasmid out of E.coli prior to the T7 IVT reaction should eliminate vector RNA.
These CTs will be further refined with DNase and RNase studies to assess if there is any vector RNA contributing to the 19 CT signal (Red figure 2). This will be followed up with genome sequencing to assess vector purity. For vaccines to be below the 330ng/mg EMA specification, we should expect to see a 11-12 CT (2^11 - 2^12) offset between the DNA and the RNA.
qPCR and RT-qPCR in this study provide relative ratios of nucleic acids. Absolute quantitation will require multiple methods such as the use of Agilent gel electrophoresis, Qubit fluorometry or more standard curves used in qPCR.
More vials need to be surveyed. These vials were unopened, however, they are 1 year old and we know very little of their storage conditions. It is possible poor storage would adversely impact RNA more readily than DNA and narrow the CT offset between the two measurements, however these CT offsets (5-7CTs) are similar to what is seen with the bivalent vaccines which have been exposed to less shelf life.
Brilliant work, thank you for everything you are doing to expose this... It is scary to contemplate, what the implications may be for all who have had this treatment in good faith not realising just what they received...
Dr Ah Kahn Syed made an interesting observation regarding plasmid contamination on Clownbaskets substack (I'll link at bottom of this comment)
"One thing many people are missing here is (1) the quantity of CDNA/EV/plasmid is very high. It should max out at 3 per 1000 RNA (by weight) according to EMA and international standards, but this is looking to be about 1:2 so about 300 per 1000. Having that much plasmid DNA injected into you is really bad - but it gets worse.
The body can normally eradicate plasmid DNA because it's foreign and the DNAases get to work. But this is wrapped in a fluffy LNP transfectant medium, so will get to every cell that the LNP touches. It will transfect the nucleus of those cells, no problem.
So now you have active EV/plasmid DNA in a LNP available to either produce huge quantities of RNA (because that's what they are there for) or else integrate into the genome - which will happen during cell division even in the absence of a specific integrase enzyme.
The quantity available is the deal breaker because it is now present in the same magnitude of amount as the RNA. They might as well have injected the self-amplifying RNA version that they wanted to from the beginning."
My take (I only have rudimentary memory from studying biology, poorly, at uni in the 90s).... The LNP... bypasses normal bodily processes of recognition and destruction, and deliver straight into cytoplasm...(and then nucleus) cellular mitosis either doubling amount due to cytoplasmic capture (and replication ability of circular plasmids), or contained within nucleus, in which case mitosis transcription error then cancer or autoimmune problems, not to mention systemic interference in normal cellular processes... I hope I read this right?? (or maybe I hope I haven't read this right, I'm praying that I have it wrong here, as this could be a bigger disaster than we've already seen worldwide).
Thank you once again for all your hard work and dedication, a million thank you's is not enough...
Links to mentioned article and comments
https://clownbasket.substack.com/p/explainer-expression-vector-contamination
https://clownbasket.substack.com/p/explainer-expression-vector-contamination/comment/13629457?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android
Good work - should set off the fire alarms - well done. Hope you can re-run this with some fresher samples, too.